Empirical research on the decision to attend college is predicated largely on the assumption that students make conscious, utility-maximizing decisions about their educational careers. For many students this may not be the case; in fact, the authors find that a large share of students assume from a young age that they will attend college, exhibiting what might be called a college-going habitus. Consistent with critical arguments about how social class is reproduced, the authors find that white, native-born children of college-educated parents are more likely to take college for granted than their less advantaged peers. Students with a college-going habitus are more likely than others to apply to a four-year college by spring of their senior year in high school. Although social origin accounts for some of the association between habitus and college application, both advantaged and disadvantaged students appear to benefit from a college-going habitus.
Abrego, Leisy J.2006. "I can’t go to college because I don’t have papers": Incorporation patterns of Latino undocumented youth. Latino Studies4:212-31.
2.
Allison, Paul D.2002. Missing data. Vol. 136 of Quantitative applications in the social sciences, ed. Michael S. Lewis-Beck.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
Apple, Michael, and Lois Weis.1983. Ideology and practice in schooling: A political and conceptual introduction. In Ideology and practice in schooling, ed. Michael Apple and Lois Weis, 3-33. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
4.
Bound, John, Matt Lovenheim, and Sarah Turner.2007. Understanding changing college completion rates. In Population Studies Center research reports. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Institute for Social Research.
5.
Bourdieu, Pierre.1984. Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste . Translated by Richard Nice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
Bourdieu, Pierre, and Jean-Claude Passeron .1990. Reproduction in education, society and culture. Translated by Richard Nice. London : Sage.
7.
Bozick, Robert, and Stefanie DeLuca .2005. Better late than never? Delayed enrollment in the high school to college transition. Social Forces84 (1): 531-54.
8.
Bozick, Robert, and Erich Lauff.2007. Education longitudinal study of 2002 (Els: 2002): A first look at the initial postsecondary experiences of the high school sophomore class of 2002. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
9.
Breen, Richard, and John H. Goldthorpe .1997. Explaining educational differentials: Towards a formal rational action theory. Rationality and Society9 (3): 275-305.
10.
Buchmann, Claudia, and Thomas DiPrete.2006. The growing female advantage in college completion: The role of family background and academic achievement. American Sociological Review71 (4): 515-41.
11.
Conger, Dylan, and Mark C. Long .2009. Why are men falling behind? Gender gaps in college performance and persistence. The Annals of the American Academy of Social and Political Science (This Volume) .
12.
Cronbach, Lee J., and Paul E. Meehl .1955. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin52:281-302.
13.
Giroux, Henry A.1983. Theories of reproduction and resistance in the new sociology of education: A critical analysis. Harvard Educational Review53 (3): 257-93.
14.
Goyette, Kimberly A.2008. College for some to college for all: Social background, occupational expectations, and educational expectations over time. Social Science Research37 (2): 461-84.
15.
Grodsky, Eric.2007. Compensatory sponsorship in higher education. American Journal of Sociology112:1662-1712.
16.
Grodsky, Eric, and Erika Jackson.2009. Social stratification in higher education . Teachers College Record111 (10).
17.
Hearn, James C.1991. Academic and nonacademic influences on the college destinations of 1980 high school graduates. Sociology of Education64 (3): 158-71.
18.
Hearn, James C.1984. The relative roles of academic, ascribed, and socioeconomic characteristics in college destinations. Sociology of Education57 (1): 22-30.
19.
Horvat, Eric McNamara.2003. The interactive effects of race and class in educational research: Theoretical insights from the work of Pierre Bourdieu. Perspectives on Urban Education35 (2).
20.
Kane, Thomas J., and Cecilia Elena Rouse .1995. Labor-market returns to two and four year college. American Economic Review85 (3): 600-614.
21.
Karen, David.2002. Changes in access to higher education in the United States: 1980-1992. Sociology of Education75:191-210.
22.
Lareau, Annette.2003. Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life . Berkeley: University of California Press.
23.
McDonough, Patricia M.1997. Choosing colleges: How social class and schools structure opportunity. Albany: State University of New York Press.
24.
Morgan, Stephen L.2005. On the edge of commitment: Educational attainment and race in the United States. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
25.
Perna, Laura W.2006. Studying college access and choice: A proposed conceptual model. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research21:99-157.
26.
Reay, Diane.1998. "Always knowing" and "never being sure": Familial and institutional habituses and higher education choice. Journal of Education Policy13 (4): 519-29.
27.
Reay, Diane, Miriam E. David, and Stephen Ball.2005. Degrees of choice: Social class, race, gender and higher education. Sterling, VA: Trentham.
28.
Roksa, Josipa, Eric Grodsky, Richard Arum, and Adam Gamoran.2007. Changes in higher education and social stratification in the United States. In Stratification in higher education, ed. Y. Shavit, R. Arum, and A. Gamoran , 165-91. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press .
29.
Stevens, Mitchell L., Elizabeth A. Armstrong, and Richard Arum.2008. Sieve, incubator, temple, hub: Empirical and theoretical advances in the sociology of higher education. Annual Review of Sociology34:127-51.
