Images of women, work, and family on television have changed enormously since the heyday of the network era. Early television confined women to the home and family setting. The increase in working women in the 1960s and 1970s was reflected in television’s images of women working and living nontraditional family lives. These images gave way, in the postnetwork era, to a form of postfeminist television in the 1990s when television undercut the ideals of liberal feminism with a series of ambiguous images challenging its gains. Women’s roles in the workplace, increasingly shown, were undercut by a sense of nostalgic yearning for the love and family life that they were seen to have displaced. Current television presents a third-wave-influenced feminism that picks up where postfeminism left off, introducing important representations more varied in race, sexuality, and the choices women are seen to make between work and family.
Akass, Kim, and Janet McCabe , ed. 2004. Reading Sex and the City. London: I. B. Tauris.
2.
Barnouw, Erik.1990. Tube of plenty. New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
Brown, Mary Ellen.1994. Soap opera and women’s lives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
Byars, Jackie, and Eileen R. Meehan .1994. Once in a lifetime: Constructing the working woman through cable narrowcasting. Camera Obscura33-34:12-41.
5.
Coontz, Stephanie.1992. The way we never were: American families and the nostalgia trap. New York: Basic Books.
6.
---. 1997. The way we really are: Coming to terms with America’s changing families. New York: Basic Books.
7.
Dicker, Rory, and Alison Piepmeier, eds. 2003. Catching a wave: Reclaiming feminism for the 21st century. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
8.
Douglas, Susan, and Meredith Michaels .2004. The mommy myth. New York: Free Press.
9.
Gill, Ros.2003. From sexual objectification to sexual subjectification: The resexualization of women’s bodies in the media. Feminist Media Studies3 (1): 100-105.
10.
Haralovich, Mary Beth.1989. Sitcoms and suburbs: Positioning the 1950’s homemaker . Quarterly Review of Film and Video2:90-91.
11.
Heide, Margaret.1995. Television culture and women’s lives: Thirtysomething and the contradictions of gender. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
12.
Heywood, Leslie, and Jennifer Drake, eds. 1997. Third wave agenda: Being feminist, doing feminism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
13.
Internet Movie Database.The Donna Reed Show: User Comments. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0051267/
14.
Lichter, Robert, Linda Lichter, and Stanley Rothman .1986. The politics of the American dream-From Lucy to Lacey: TV’s dream girls. Public Opinion9 (3): 16-19.
15.
---. 1992. The meaning of memory: Family, class and ethnicity in early network television. In Private screenings, ed. Lynn Spigel and Denise Mann , 71-92. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press .
16.
Lotz, Amanda.2006. Redesigning women: Television after the network era. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
17.
Mellencamp, Patricia.1986. Situation comedy, feminism, and Freud: Discourses of Gracie and Lucy. In Studies in entertainment, ed. Tania Modleski, 80-98. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
18.
Orbach, Susie.1978. Fat is a Feminist Issue. New York: Berkeley.
19.
Oren, Tasha.2003. Domesticated dads and double-shift moms: Real life and ideal life in 1950’s domestic comedy. Cercles8:78-90.
20.
Press, Andrea L.1991. Women watching television: Gender, class and generation in the American television experience. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
21.
Press, Andrea L., and Terry Strathman .1993. Work, family and social class in television images of women: Prime-time television and the construction of postfeminism. Women and Language16 (2): 7-15.
22.
Sex and the City. Episode no. 59., first air broadcast, 5 August 2001 by HBO. Directed by David Frankel and written by Jenny Bicks.
23.
Spigel, Lynn.1992. Make room for TV. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
---. 1995. From the dark ages to the golden age: Women’s memories and television reruns. Screen36 (1): 16-33
25.
---. 2001. Welcome to the dreamhouse. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
26.
Spigel, Lynn, and Denise Mann, eds. 1992. Private screenings. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press .
27.
Taylor, Ella.1989. Prime-time families. Berkeley : University of California Press.
28.
Tukachinsky, Riva H.2008. Feminist and postfeminist readings of romantic narratives: Heterosexual romantic experiences versus Sex and the City. Feminist Media Studies8 (2): 181-96.
29.
Vidmar, Neil, and Milton Rokeach.1974. Archie Bunker’s bigotry: A study in selective perception and exposure. Journal of Communication24:36-47.
30.
Walters, Susannah.2001. All the rage: The story of gay visibility in America . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
