In this article, the authors explore how data on the use of time might be used to investigate the multilevel connections between family-related policies and fathers' child care time in a cross-national context. The authors present a case study analysis of “fathering strategies” in which empirical findings from time-use data are compared with detailed policy information from Norway, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. These analyses show that time-use data can not only shed light on the effects of specific policies in different national contexts but also point to the need to consider the complexity of multiple policies and their adoption in specific national contexts across time. The authors describe the development of a cross-national, cross-time database that combines time-use data with relevant social and family policy information, with the aim of providing a multilevel research tool to those interested in exploring further the relationships between policy and family work.
Ahlberg, Jenny, Christine Roman, and Simon Duncan.2008. Actualizing the democratic family? Swedish policy rhetoric versus family practices. Social Politics15 (1): 79-100.
2.
Bianchi, Suzanne M., John P. Robinson, and Melissa A. Milkie .2006. Changing rhythms of American family life. Rose Series in Sociology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
3.
Bjornberg, Ullna.2002. Ideology and choice between work and care: Swedish policy for working parents. Critical Social Policy22 (1): 33-52.
4.
Brandth, Berit, and Elin Kvande.1998. Masculinity and childcare-The reconstruction of fathering. Sociological Review46 (2): 293-314.
5.
---. 2001. Flexible work and flexible fathers. Work, Family and Society15 (2): 251-67.
6.
---. 2007. Norway. In International review of leave policies and related research, Employment Relations Research Series no. 80 , ed. P. Moss, and K. Wall, 213-30. London: Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform.
7.
---. 2009. Gendered or gender-neutral care politics for fathers?The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science624:177-189.
8.
Bygren, Magnus, and Ann-Zofie Duvander .2006. Parents' workplace situation and fathers' parental leave use. Journal of Marriage and Family68 (2): 363-72.
9.
Chronholm, Andres, Linda Haas, and Philip Hwang.2007. Sweden. In International review of leave policies and related research, Employment Relations Research Series no. 80, ed. P. Moss, and K. Wall, 260-71. London: Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform.
10.
Crompton, Rosemary.1999. Discussion and conclusions. In Restructuring gender relations and employment: The decline of the male breadwinner , ed. R. Crompton, 1-25. Oxford , UK: Oxford University Press.
11.
Deven, Fred, and Peter Moss.2002. Leave arrangements for parents: Overview and future outlook. Community, Work and Family5 (3): 237-55.
12.
Ellingsæter, A.-L.2006. The Norwegian childcare regime and its paradoxes . In Politicising parenthood in Scandinavia: Gender relations in welfare states, ed. Anne L. Ellingsæter and Arnlaug Leira.Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
13.
Esping-Andersen, Gosta.1990. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
14.
---. 1999. Social foundations of postindustrial economies. New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
Fagnani, Jeanne, and Marie-Thérèse Letablier .2004. Work and family life balance: The impact of the 35-hour laws in France. Work Employment and Society18 (3): 551-72.
16.
Ferri, Elsa, and Kate Smith.1996. Parenting in the 1990s. Family and Parenthood Series. London: Family Policy Studies Centre.
17.
Fisher, Kimberly, Muriel Egerton, Jonathan I. Gershuny, and John P. Robinson .2007. Gender convergence in the American Heritage Time Use Study (AHTUS). Social Indicators Research82 (1): 1-33.
18.
Flood, Lennart, and Urban Grâsjö.1997. Tid för barn, tid för arbete [Time for children, time for work]. In Familj, makt och jämställdhet [Family, power, and gender equality], ed. G. Ahrne, and I. Persson, 159-83. Stockholm , Sweden: Statens offentliga utredningar.
19.
Folbre, Nancy.2008. Valuing children: Rethinking the economics of the family . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20.
Fraser, Nancy.1994. After the family wage: Gender equality and the welfare state. Political Theory22 (4): 591-618.
21.
Fuwa, Makiko, and Philip N. Cohen .2007. Housework and social policy . Social Science Research36 (2): 512-30.
22.
Gauthier, Anne H.2003. Comparative family benefits database, version 2 . University Of Calgary. http://www.soci.ucalgary.ca/FYPP/images/DOCUMENTS/DOC_Fam_benefits_database_Feb_03.doc .
23.
Gershuny, Jonathan.2000. Changing times: Work and leisure in postindustrial society . New York: Oxford University Press .
24.
Gershuny, Jonathan, and Oriel Sullivan.2003. Time use, gender, and public policy regimes. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society10 (2): 205-28.
25.
Gornick, Janet C., and Marcia K. Meyers .2003. Families that work: Policies for reconciling parenthood and employment. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
26.
---. 2007. Institutions for gender egalitarianism: Creating the conditions for egalitarian dual-earner/ dual-caregiver families. Real Utopias Project, University of Wisconsin, Havens Center. http://www.havenscenter.org/realutopias/2006.
27.
Gregory, Abigail, and Susan Milner.2008. Fatherhood regimes and father involvement in France and the UK. Community, Work & Family11 (1): 61-84.
28.
Haas, Linda.1992. Equal parenthood and social policy: A study of parental leave in Sweden. Albany: State University of New York Press.
29.
---. 2005. The work-care balance: Is it possible to identify typologies for cross-national comparisons? Current Sociology53 (3): 487-508.
30.
---. 2000. Programs and policies promoting women's economic equality and men's childcare in Sweden. In Organizational change and gender equity: International perspectives on fathers and mothers at the workplace , ed. L. Haas, P. Hwang, and G. Russell, 133-61. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
---. 2008. The impact of taking parental leave on fathers' participation in childcare and relationships with children: Lessons from Sweden. Community, Work & Family11 (1): 85-104.
32.
Haintrais, Linda.2004. Family policy matters: Responding to family change in Europe. Bristol, UK: Policy Press .
33.
Heymann, Jody S., Alison Earle, and Jeffrey Hayes.2007. The work, family, and equity index: How does the United States measure up?Montreal, Canada: McGill University, The Institute for Health and Social Policy.
34.
Hobson, Barbara.1990. No exit, no voice: Women's economic dependency and the welfare state. Acta Sociologica33 (3): 235-50.
35.
---, ed. 2002. Making men into fathers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Hobson, Barbara, and Susanne Fahlén.2009. Competing scenarios for European fathers: Applying Sen's capabilities and agency framework to work-family balance. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science624: 214-233.
37.
Hobson, Barbara, and David Morgan.2002. Introduction. In Making men into fathers: Men, masculinities and the social politics of fatherhood , ed. B. Hobson, 1-24. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
38.
Hook, Jennifer.2006. Care in context: Men's unpaid work in 20 countries, 1965-2003 . American Sociological Review71 (4): 639-60.
39.
Kitterød, Ragni Hege, and Vatne Eilie Pettersen .2006. Making up for mothers' employed working hours? Housework and childcare among Norwegian fathers. Work, Employment and Society20 (3): 473-92.
40.
Knijn, Trudie, and Monique Kremer.1997. Gender and the caring dimension of welfare states: Toward inclusive citizenship. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society4 (3): 328-61.
41.
Lappegard, Trude.2008. Changing the gender balance in caring: Fatherhood and the division of parental leave in Norway. Population Research and Policy Review27 (2): 139-59.
42.
Leira, Arnlaug.1992. Welfare states and working mothers: The Scandinavian experience . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
---. 1998. Caring as social right: Cash for childcare and daddy leave . Social Politics5 (3): 362-78.
44.
Lewis, Jane.1992. Gender and the development of welfare regime. Journal of European Social Policy2 (3): 159-73.
45.
Moss, Peter, and Fred Deven , eds. 1999. Parental leave: Progress or pitfall? Research and policy issues in Europe. Brussels: NIDI/CBGS Publications.
46.
Moss, Peter, and Margaret O'Brien .2006. United Kingdom. In International review of leave policies and related research, Employment Relations Research Series no. 57, ed. P. Moss, and M. O'Brien, 217-24. London : Department of Trade and Industry.
47.
Nyberg, Anita.2006. The dual-earner/dual-carer model in Sweden: Public policies and parents' response. Stockholm, Sweden: National Institute for Working Life.
48.
O'Brien, Margaret.2009. Fathers, parental leave policies, and infant quality of life: International perspectives and policy impact. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science624: 190-213.
49.
O'Brien, Margaret, Berit Brandth, and Elin Kvande.2007. Fathers, work and family life: Global perspectives and new insights. Community, Work & Family10 (4): 375-86.
50.
O'Connor, Julia S., Ann S. Orloff, and Sheila Shaver.1999. States, markets, families: Gender, liberalism and social policy in Australia, Canada, Great Britain and the United States . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51.
Orloff, Ann S.1993. The politics of pensions: A comparative analysis of Britain, Canada, and the United States, 1880-1940. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
52.
---. 2006. From maternalism to "employment for all": State policies to promote women's employment across the affluent democracies. Institute for Policy Research, Working Paper 05-10, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL. http://www.northwestern.edu/ipr/publications/papers/2005/WP-05-10.pdf .
53.
Pfau-Effinger, Birgit.2004. Development of culture, welfare states and women's employment in Europe. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate .
54.
Robinson, John P., and Geoffrey Godbey .1999. Time for life: The surprising ways Americans use their time. 2nd ed. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press .
55.
Sainsbury, Diane, ed. 1994. Gendering welfare states. London: Sage.
56.
Sayer, Liana C., Anne H. Gauthier, and Frank F. Furstenberg Jr.2004. Educational differences in parents' time with children: Cross-national variations. Journal of Marriage and Family66 (5): 1152-69.
57.
Scott Coltrane.1996. Family Man: Fatherhood, Housework, and Gender Equity . New York: Oxford University Press .
58.
Scott Coltrane and Randall Collins .2001. Sociology of Marriage and the Family: Gender, Love, and Property (5th Edition). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
59.
Scott Coltrane (ed.). 2004. Families and Society. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
60.
Scott Coltrane and Michele Adams.2008. Gender and Families (Gender Lens Series , 2nd Edition). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
61.
Skocpol, Theda.1992. Protecting soldiers and mothers: Political origins of social policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
62.
Smith, Alison, and Donald R. Williams .2007. Father-friendly legislation and paternal time across Western Europe. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice9 (2): 175-92.
63.
Sundström, Marianne, and Ann-Zofie E. Duvander .2002. Gender division of childcare and the sharing of parental leave among new parents in Sweden. European Sociological Review18 (4): 433-47.
64.
Valdimarsdóttir, Friòa Ros.2006. Nordic experiences with parental leave and its impact on equality between women and men. Copenhagen, Denmark: Nordic Council of Ministers.
