The Constitution of South Africa provides simply for claimants to represent anyone who cannot act, or a group, or the public interest. In the absence of more detailed procedural rules on how these rights are to operate, the courts have had to grapple with issues on standing within a difficult socioeconomic and political background.
Baxter.1984. Administrative law. Cape Town, South Africa: Juta and Co.
2.
Budlender.1993. The accessibility of administrative justice. Acta Juridica128.
3.
Cane.1995. Standing up for the public. PL 276.
4.
Corder and Davis.1988. Law and social practice: An introduction. In Essays on law and social practice in South Africa, ed. Corder, 1.Cape Town, South Africa: Juta and Co.
5.
Davenport and Saunders.2000. South Africa: A modern history. 5th ed. London: Macmillan.
6.
Davis and Cheadle.1997. The application of the 1996 Constitution in the private sphere. SAJHR13:44.
7.
Devenish.1998. A commentary on the South African Constitution. Durban , South Africa: Butterworths.
8.
Dugard.1978. Human rights and the South African legal order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
Hunter.1997. The draft legislation concerning public interest actions and class actions: The answer to all class ills?CILSA30:304.
10.
Klug.1996. Historical background. In Constitutional law of South Africa , ed. Chaskalson et al. Cape Town, South Africa: Juta and Co.
11.
Loots.1987. Keeping locus standi in chains. SAJHR3:66.
12.
---. 1994. Standing to enforce fundamental rights. SAJHR10:49-50.
13.
Plasket.2000. Standing, welfare rights and administrative justice. SALJ117:647.
14.
Trengove.1995. Procedure. Presented at Juta's seminar on Constitutional Litigation, Procedure and Practice, Cape Town, South Africa, March.
