Israel's civil litigation system, derived primarily from that of England and Wales, gradually evolved a series of American-influenced provisions into sector-specific Israeli law (from 1988 to 2005). The 2006 general Class Action Law introduced a comprehensive class action legal framework, containing detailed provisions on, inter alia, permissible causes of action, certification, representation, case management, settlements, funding, costs, and fees.
Haas, P.1992. Epistemic communities and international policy coordination . International Organization46:1.
2.
Goldstein, S.1990. Class actions in Israel. International Comp. Law13:45.
3.
---. 2007. Comments on the Representative Actions Act 2006. Alei Mishpat7:6, at 8 (in Hebrew).
4.
Goldstein, S., and Y. Efron.2000. The development of class actions in Israel. Alei Mishpat1:27 (in Hebrew).
5.
---. 2002. Class action mechanisms and derivative claims in the New Corporation Act. Mishpatim32:461 (in Hebrew).
6.
Hensler, D.R., N.M. Pace, B. Dombey-Moore, B. Giddens, J. Gross, and E.K. Moller.2000. Class actions dilemmas: Pursuing public goals for private gains. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Institute for Civil Justice.
7.
Kingdon, John W.1984. Agendas, alternatives and public policies. Boston: Little, Brown.
8.
Lord Woolf.1995. Access to justice: Interim report. London: Lord Chancellor's Department.
9.
---. 1996. Access to justice: Final report. London : Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
10.
Slaughter, A.M.2004. A new world order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
Telgam, Judge M.2005. The representative action-Considerations in deciding on counsel fees and awards to representative plaintiffs. Sha'arei Mishpat4 (1): 227 (in Hebrew).
