England and Wales have rules on managing multiple similar claims (the Group Litigation Order) and particular representative procedures for consumer protection cases and for competition cases. The competition procedure permits representative damages claims and reforms may introduce damages more widely. But the most interesting feature is the development of oversight of collective compensation by public regulatory authorities and alternative dispute resolution or voluntary mechanisms.
Bartle, I., and P. Vass.2005. Self-regulation and the regulatory state-A survey of policy and practice. Bath, UK: Centre for the Study of Regulated Industries, University of Bath School of Management.
2.
Blankenburg, E.1999. Lawyers' lobby and the welfare state: The political economy of legal aid. In The transformation of legal aid, ed. F. Regan, A. Patterson , T. Goriely, and D. Fleming.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
3.
---. 2003. Judicial systems in Western Europe: Comparative indicators of legal professionals, courts, litigation, and budgets in the 1990s. In Beyond common knowledge. Empirical approaches to the rule of law , ed. E. Jensen and T. Heller.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
4.
Fichardt, L., and P. Freund.2007. The UK Tax Group litigation orders-The current status. E. C. Tax J.9 (2): 2.
5.
Hodges, C.2001. Multi party actions. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
6.
---. 2007. Encouraging enterprise and rebalancing risk: Implications of economic policy for regulation, enforcement and compensation. European Business Law Review18:1231-66.
7.
---. 2008. The Reform of Class and Representative Actions in European Legal Systems: A New Framework for Collective Redress in Europe. Oxford, UK: Hart.
8.
Macrory, R.2006. Regulatory justice: Making sanctions effective. London: Her Majesty's Treasury.
9.
Mulheron, R.P.2008. Reform of collective redress in England and Wales: A perspective of need. London: Civil Justice Council .
10.
Slapper, G., and D. Kelly.2006. English law. 2nd ed. London: Routledge Cavendish .
11.
Society of Advanced Legal Studies.2001. The ethics of conditional fee arrangements. London: Society of Advanced Legal Studies.
12.
Whitehead, S.2006. Group litigation and the European Court of Justice. E. C. Tax J.8 (3): 13.
13.
Yarrow, S., and P. Abrams.1999. Conditional fees: The challenge to ethics. Leg. Ethics2:192.
