Most of the provinces and the Federal Court have adopted class action procedures influenced by the U.S. model, with certification and opt out, but differing rules on costs apply. A significant number of cases are brought, most of which settle. There are unresolved transborder issues.
Baert, K.M., and A. Guindon.2008. Class proceedings in Ontario: The growing risk of adverse costs awards against representative plaintiffs. Paper presented at the 5th Annual Symposium on Class Actions, Toronto, Canada, April 10-11.
2.
Baert, K.M., and J. Ptak.2008. Aggregate damages under the Class Proceedings Act, 1992: Ensuring a wrong doesn't elude a remedy. Paper presented at the 5th Annual Symposium on Class Actions, Toronto, Canada, April 10-11.
3.
Bogart, W.A.1986-1987. Questioning litigation's role-courts and class actions in Canada. Ind. L.J.62:665.
4.
---. 1992. "Ambiquity". In Class actions in Ontario and Quebec: Proceedings of the First Yves Pratte Conference, ed. A. Prejiner and J. Roy.Montréal, Canada: Éditions Wilson & La Fleur Lteé.
5.
Cromwell, T.1983. An examination of the Ontario Law Reform Commission report on class actions. Ottawa L. Rev. 15:587.
6.
Gall, G.2004. The Canadian legal system. 5th ed. Scarborough, Canada: Thomson Canada Limited.
7.
Glenn, P.1986. The dilemma of class action reform. OxfordJ. Legal Stud. 6:262.
8.
Hilsee, T.2007. Canadian class action notice-A rising tide of effectiveness . Paper presented to the 4th Annual Symposium on Class Actions, Toronto, Canada, April 26-27.
9.
Howard, P.F.C., and S. Hosseini.2008. Determining carriage in Canadian multi-jurisidictional class actions. Paper presented at the 5th Annual Symposium on Class Actions, Toronto, Canada, April 10-11.
10.
Jones, C.2007. Disorderly and unfair: The weird present and uncertain future of "full faith and credit" in interjurisdictional class actions. Paper presented to the 4th Annual Symposium on Class Actions, Toronto, Canada, April 26-27.
11.
Kirbyson, G.2007. The big picture. Canadian Lawyer31 (8): 20.
12.
Lafond, P.-C.2006. La recours collectif, le rôle du juge et sa conception de la justice, impact et évolution. Cowansille, Canada: Les Éditions Yvon Blais Inc.
13.
Macdonald, W.A., QC , and J.W. Rowley, QC.1984. Ontario class action reform: Business and justice system impacts-A comment. Can. Bus. L.J.9:351.
14.
Millan, L.2007. Is Quebec losing its status as a class action haven?The Lawyers Weekly27 (12): 1.
15.
Poltak, C.2006. Ontario and her sisters: Should full faith and credit apply to the national class? The Canadian Class Action Review3:437.
16.
Scott, I.1990. Reforming the system: Consultation and collaboration. L. Soc'y Gaz. 24:42.
17.
Branch, W.K.2007. Class actions in Canada. Release no. 19, July. Aurora, Canada: Canada Law Book.
18.
Branch, W.K., and L. Brasil.2007. "If it ain't broke, don't fix it! If it is broke, fix it!" Costs regimes for class actions. Paper presented to the 4th Annual Symposium on Class Actions, Toronto, Canada, April 26-27. Branch McMaster, http://www.branmac.com/go/download/broke-fix.pdf.
19.
Branch, W.K., and D. Montrichard.2005. Exposing the "litigation blackmail" myth. Paper prepared for British Columbia CLE, February 25. Branch MacMaster, http://www.branmac.com/classactions/articles.htm.
20.
Winkler, W.K.2000. Advocacy in class proceedings litigation. Advocates' Soc. J.19 (1): 6-9.
