Are political liberals generous? Are political conservatives conscientious? Are generous people personally agreeable? Research in behavioral genetics and elsewhere increasingly indicates a biological basis for the manner in which people behave in personal, interpersonal, and political situations, but this biological basis does not mean behavior in these three very different contexts is correlated. In this article, using an original data set obtained from nearly three hundred subjects, the authors are able to test for the degree to which personal, interpersonal, and political temperaments are related. As expected, the overall correlations are quite low. Standard personality traits do not predict political attitudes, and neither political attitudes nor personality predicts the extent to which subjects are generous in interpersonal situations. Human behavior is partially biological, but the systems involved in shaping political behavior seem to be largely but not completely distinct from those involved in shaping personal and interpersonal behavior.
Adorno, T., E. Frenkel-Brunswik, D. Levinson, and R. Sanford.1950. The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.
2.
Altemeyer, Bob.1981. Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg, Canada: University of Manitoba Press.
3.
———. 1996. The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
Anderson, Lisa R., Jennifer M. Mellor, and Jeffrey Milyo.2004. Do liberals play nice? The effects of party and political ideology in public goods and trust games. Unpublished Working Paper, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA.
5.
Bachner-Melman, Rachel, Christian Dina, Ada H. Zohar, Naama Constantini, Elad Lerer, Sarah Hoch, Sarah Sella, Lubov Nemanov, Inga Gritsenko, Pesach Lichtenberg, et al. 2005. AVPR1 and SLC6A4 gene polymorphisms are associated with creative dance performance. PLoSGenetics1:394-403.
6.
Block, Jack, and Jeanne H. Block .2005. Nursery school personality and political orientation two decades later. Journal of Research in Personality39:395-422.
7.
Boone, Christopher, Bert De Branbander, and Arjen van Witteloostuijn .1999. The impact of personality on behavior in five Prisoner's Dilemma games. Journal of Economic Psychology20:343-77.
8.
Bouchard, T.J., Jr. , and Matt McGue.2003. Genetic and environmental influences on human psychological differences. Journal of Neurobiology54:4-45.
9.
Brandstatter, Hermann, and Werner Guth.2002. Personality in dictator and ultimatum games. Central European Journal of Operations Research10:191-215.
10.
Caprara, G.V., C. Barbaranelli, and P.G. Zimbardo.1999. Personality profiles and political parties . Political Psychology20:175-97.
11.
Caprara, G.V., S. Schwartz, C. Capanna, M. Vecchione, and C. Barbaranelli .2006. Personality and politics: Values, traits, and political choice. Political Psychology27:1-28.
12.
Carmen, Ira.2007. Genetic configurations of political phenomena. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science614:34-55.
13.
Comings, D.E., R. Gade-Andavoluy, N. Gonzales, S. Wu, D. Muhleman, H. Blake, M.B. Mann, G. Dietz, G. Saucier, and J.P. MacMurray.2000. A multivariate analysis of 59 candidate genes in personality traits: The Temperament and Character Inventory. Clinical Genetics58:375-85.
14.
Comrey, A.L., and J.A. Newmeyer.1965. Measurement of radicalism-conservatism . Journal of Social Psychology67:357-69.
15.
De Waal, Frans B. M., 1982. Chimpanzee politics: Power and sex among apes. London: Jonathan Cape.
16.
———. 1996. Good natured: The origins and right and wrong in humans and other animals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
DeYoung, Colin G., Jordan B. Peterson, and Daniel M. Higgins .2005. Sources of openness/intellect: Cognitive and neuropsychological correlates of the fifth factor of personality . Journal of Personality73:825-58.
18.
Fehr, Ernst, Urs Fischbacher, Bernhard von Rosenbladt, Jurgen Schupp, and Gert G. Wagner.2002. A nation-wide laboratory—Examining trust and trustworthiness by integrating behavioral experiments into representative surveys. Schmollers Jahrbuch122 (4): 519-42.
19.
Frank, Thomas.2004. What's the matter with Kansas?New York: Metropolitan Books.
20.
Jost, John T.2006. The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist61:651-70.
21.
Jost, John T., Jack Glaser, Arie W. Kruglanski , and Frank J. Sulloway.2003. Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin129:339-75.
22.
Lakoff, George.2006. Thinking points: Communicating our American values and vision. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
23.
McClosky, Herbert.1958. Conservatism and personality. American Political Science Review52:27-45.
24.
McCrae, Robert R., and Paul T. Costa Jr .1999. A five-factor theory of personality . In Handbook of personality, 2nd ed., ed. Lawrence A. Pervin and Oliver P. John.New York: Guilford.
25.
Mehrabian, Albert.1996. Relations among political attitudes, personality, and psychopathology. Basic and Applied Social Psychology18:469-91.
26.
Mestelman, Stuart, and David Feeny.1988. Does ideology matter? Anecdotal experimental evidence on the voluntary provision of public goods. Public Choice57:287-94.
27.
Mondak, Jeffery J., and Karen D. Halperin .Forthcoming. A framework for the study of personality and political behavior. British Journal of Political Science .
28.
Pratto, F., J. Sidanius, L.M. Stallworth, and B.F. Malle.1994. Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology67:741-63.
29.
Ray, John J.1985. Defective validity in the Altemeyer Authoritarianism Scale . Journal of Social Psychology125:271-72.
30.
Shils, Edward A.1954. Authoritarianism: Right and left. In Studies in the scope and method of the authoritarian personality, ed. Richard Christie and Marie Jahoda.Glencoe, IL: Free Press .
31.
Swope, Kurtis J., John Cadigan, Pamela M. Schmitt , and Robert S. Shupp.2005. Personality preferences in laboratory economics experiments. Working Paper, Department of Economics, Ball State University, Muncie, IN.
32.
van Gestel, S., and C. van Broeckhoven .2003. Genetics of personality: Are we making progress? MolecularPsychiatry8:840-52.
33.
Whitaker, Eric.2006. Personality and political orientation: A reanalysis of an age-old question. Unpublished paper, Department of Political Science, University of Nebraska— Lincoln.
