Personal Influence is not only a landmark study within the sociological literature on networks, influence, and decision making. It is also an allegory of Jewish-ethnic identity in mid-twentieth-century America and a side-ways commentary on modern Jewish involvement in communications. The book participates in a utopian imagination of society in which Jews and Gentiles alike would be centrally involved in the flow of communications. It turns from Gentile-style status toward Jewish-style connectivity as the basis of social power; defends socially grounded conceptions of mental life against Gentile individualism; insists in its notion of the two-step flow on the rabbinic principle that a text without a commentary is meaningless; and performs some amazing intellectual-moral-historical footwork with the most inconspicuous of all its central terms, “people.” In all these things, it can be read as a “Jewish” text in some sense.
Agamben, Giorgio. 2000. Le temps qui reste: Un commentaire de l'Epitre aux Romains. Translated by Judith Revel. Paris: Éditions Payot et Rivages.
2.
Badiou, Alain. 1997. Saint Paul: La fondation de l'universalisme. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
3.
Boyarin, Daniel. 1994. A radical Jew: Paul and the politics of identity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
4.
Boyarin, Daniel. 1997. Unheroic conduct: The rise of heterosexuality and the invention of the Jewish man. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5.
Bushman, Richard Lyman. 2004. The Book of Mormon and its critics. In Believing history: Latter-day Saint essays, 107-142. New York: Columbia University Press.
6.
Cooper, Eunice, and Marie Jahoda. 1947. The evasion of propaganda: How prejudiced people respond to anti-prejudice propaganda. Journal of Psychology23:15-25.
7.
Cuddihy, John Murray. 1974. The ordeal of civility: Freud, Marx, Lévi-Strauss and the Jewish struggle with modernity. New York: Basic.
8.
Davison, W. Phillips. 1983. The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly47:1-15.
9.
Durkheim, Emile. 1897/1951. Suicide: A study in sociology. Translated by John A.Spaulding and George Simpson. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
10.
Freud, Sigmund. 1905/1989. Jokes and their relation to the unconscious. New York: Norton.
11.
Gabler, Neal. 1988. An empire of their own: How the Jews invented Hollywood. New York: Crown.
12.
Gitlin, Todd. 1978. Media sociology: The dominant paradigm. Theory and Society5:205-253.
13.
Gunn, J. A. W.1983. Beyond liberty and property: The process of self-recognition in eighteenth-century political thought. Kingston, Canada: McGill-Queen's University Press.
14.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1962/1989. Structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
Hardt, Michael, and Antonio Negri. 2000. Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
Hegel, G. W. F.1821/1970. Philosophie des Rechts. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.
17.
Hollinger, David A.2004. Rich, powerful, and smart: Jewish overrepresentation should be explained instead of avoided or mystified. Jewish Quarterly Review94:595-602.
18.
Katz, Elihu. 1987. Communications research since Lazarsfeld. Public Opinion Quarterly51 (50th Anniversary Supplement): S25-S45.
19.
Katz, Elihu. 2006. Lazarsfeld's legacy: The power of limited effects. In Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications, 2nd ed., xv-xxv. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.
20.
Katz, Elihu, and Paul F. Lazarsfeld. 1955. Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
21.
Kendall, Patricia L., and Katherine M. Wolf. 1949. The analysis of deviant cases in communications research. In Communications research, 1948-1949, ed. Paul F.Lazarsfeld and Frank N.Stanton. New York: Harper and Brothers.
22.
Lynd, Robert S., and Helen Merrell Lynd. 1929. Middletown: A study in contemporary American culture. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
23.
Merton, Robert K.1938/1996. Science and the social order. In On social structure and science, ed. Piotr Sztompka. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
Merton, Robert K.1942. A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology1:115-126.
25.
Merton, Robert K. 1994. A life of learning. American Council of Learned Societies Occasional Paper no. 25. http://www.acls.org/op25.htm (accessed October 8, 2005).
26.
Mill, John Stuart. 1859/1975. On liberty. New York: Norton.
27.
Most, Andrea. 2004. Making Americans: Jews and the Broadway musical. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
Peters, John Durham. 1989. Democracy and American mass communication theory: Dewey, Lippmann, Lazarsfeld. Communication11:199-220.
29.
Peters, John Durham, and Peter Simonson. 2004. Mass communication and American social thought: Key texts, 1919-1968. Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield.
30.
Riesman, David. 1950. The lonely crowd: A study of the changing American character. With Reuel Denney and Nathan Glazer. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
31.
Rogin, Michael. 1996. Blackface, white noise. Berkeley: University of California Press.
32.
Simonson, Peter. 1996. Dreams of democratic togetherness: Communication hope from Cooley to Katz. Critical Studies in Mass Communication13:324-342.
33.
Simonson, Peter. 2006. Visions of mass communication: An unorthodox history from Paul of Tarsus to the county fair. Manuscript, University of Colorado.
34.
Slezkine, Yuri. 2004. The Jewish century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
Sombart, Werner. 1911. Die Juden und das Wirtschaftsleben. Leipzig, Germany: Duncker & Humblot.
36.
Speiser, E. A.1960. “People” and “nation” of Israel. Journal of Biblical Literature79:157-163.
37.
Veblen, Thorstein. 1919. The intellectual pre-eminence of the Jews in modern Europe. Political Science Quarterly34:33-42.
38.
Walzer, Michael. 1985. Exodus and revolution. New York: Basic Books.
39.
Weber, Max. 1904-1905/1958. Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Translated by Talcott Parsons. New York: Scribner's.
40.
Žižek, Slavoj. 1999. The ticklish subject. New York: Verso.
