Convicted felons face both legal and informal barriers to becoming productive citizens at work, responsible citizens in family life, and active citizens in their communities. As criminal punishment has increased in the United States, collateral sanctions such as voting restrictions have taken on new meaning. The authors place such restrictions in comparative context and consider their effects on civil liberties, democratic institutions, and civic life more generally. Based on demographic life tables, the authors estimate that approximately 4 million former prisoners and 11.7 million former felons live and work among us every day. The authors describe historical changes in these groups; their effects on social institutions; and the extent to which they constitute a caste, class, or status group within American society. The authors conclude by discussing how reintegrative criminal justice practices might strengthen democracy while preserving, and perhaps enhancing, public safety.
Baltzell, E. Digby. 1964. The Protestant establishment. New York: Random House.
2.
Beteille, Andre. 1996. Caste, class, and power: Changing patterns of stratification in a Tanjore village. 2nd ed.New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
Bonczar, Thomas P.2003. Prevalence of imprisonment in the U.S. population, 1974-2001. Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
4.
Bonczar, Thomas P., and Allen J. Beck. 1997. Lifetime likelihood of going to state or federal prison. Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin, NCJ 160092. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
5.
Braithwaite, John. 1989. Crime, shame, and reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Buckler, Kevin G., and Lawrence F. Travis III.2003. Reanalyzing the prevalence and social context of collateral consequence statutes. Journal of Criminal Justice31:435-453.
7.
Bushway, Shawn D.2004. Labor market effects of permitting employer access to criminal history records. Journal of Contemporary Crime and Justice20:276-291.
8.
Chin, Gabriel J.2002. Race, the war on drugs, and the collateral consequences of criminal conviction. Journal of Gender, Race, and Justice6:253-275.
9.
Cose, Ellis. 2000. The prison paradox. Newsweek, November 13.
10.
Cox, Oliver C.1948. Caste, class, and race. New York: Doubleday.
11.
Dietrich, Sharon M.2002. Criminal records and employment: Ex-offenders’ thwarted attempts to earn a living for their families. In Every door closed: Barriers facing parents with criminal records, 13-26. Washington, DC/Philadelphia: Center for Law and Social Policy/Community Legal Services, Inc.http://www.soros.org/initiatives/justice/articles_publications/publications/every_door_closed_20020101/Every%2520Door%2520Closed.pdf.
12.
Dollard, John. 1937/1988. Caste and class in a Southern town. Madison: Unversity of Wisconsin Press.
13.
Domhoff, G. William. 2002. Who rules America? Power and politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
14.
Florida Department of Corrections. 2005. Inmate release information search. http://www.dc.state.fl.us/inmateinfo/inmateinfomenu.asp (accessed September 3, 2005).
15.
Fredrickson, George M.1981. White supremacy: A comparative study in American and South African history. New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
Freeman, Richard. 1992. Crime and the employment of disadvantaged youth. In Urban labor markets and job opportunity, ed. George Peterson and Wayne Vroman, 171-192. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
17.
Fuller, C. J.1996. Introduction: Caste today. In Caste today, ed. C. J. Fuller, 1-31. New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
Gans, Herbert. 1994. Positive functions of the undeserving poor: Uses of the underclass in America. Politics and Society22:269-283.
19.
Gilbert, Neil. 1999. The size and influence of the underclass: An exaggerated view. Society37:43-45.
20.
Grant, Walter Matthews, John LeCournu, John Andrews Pickens, Dean Hill Rivkin, and C. Roger Vinson. 1970. The collateral consequences of a criminal conviction. Vanderbilt Law Review23:929-1241.
21.
Hagan, John, and Alberto Palloni. 1990. The social reproduction of a criminal class in working-class London, circa 1950-1980. American Journal of Sociology96:265-299.
22.
Hoffman, Peter B., and Barbara Stone-Meierhoefer. 1980. Reporting recidivism rates: The criterion and follow-up issues. Journal of Criminal Justice8:53-60.
23.
Holzer, Harry J., Steven Raphael, and Michael A. Stoll. 2004. Will employers hire former offenders? Employer preferences, background checks, and their determinants. In Imprisoning America, the social effects of mass incarceration,ed. Mary Pattillo, David Weiman, and Bruce Western, 205-246. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
24.
Irwin, John. 1987. The felon. 2nd. ed.Berkeley: University of California Press.
25.
Jencks, Christopher. 1992. Rethinking social policy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
Kalt, Brian C.2003. The exclusion of felons from jury service. American University Law Review53:65-189.
27.
Klinkner, Philip, and Rogers Smith. 1999. The unsteady march. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28.
Langan, Patrick A., and David J. Levin. 2002. Recidivism of prisoners released in 1994. Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
29.
Laub, John H., Daniel S. Nagin, and Robert J. Sampson. 1998. Trajectories of change in criminal offending: Good marriages and the desistance process. American Sociological Review63:225-238.
30.
Laub, John H., and Robert J. Sampson. 2003. Shared beginnings, divergent lives: Delinquent boys to age 70. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
Lichter, Daniel T., Diane K. McLaughlin, George Kephart, and David J. Landry, 1992. Race and the retreat from marriage: A shortage of marriageable men. American Sociological Review57:781-799.
32.
Lueck, Thomas J.2000. Plan to seal some criminal records debated. New York Times, October 20.
33.
Manza, Jeff. 1992. Classes, status groups, and social closure: A critique of neo-Weberian social theory. Current Perspectives in Social Theory12:275-302.
34.
Manza, Jeff, and Christopher Uggen. 2006. Locked out: Felon disenfranchisement and American democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
35.
Marshall, T. H.1950. Citizenship and social class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Marx, Karl. 1963. The eighteenth brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. New York: International Publishers.
37.
Mauer, Marc, and Meda Chesney-Lind, eds. 2002. Invisible punishment: The collateral consequences of mass imprisonment. New York: New Press.
38.
May, Bruce E.1995. The character component of occupational licensing laws: A continuing barrier to the ex-felon’s employment opportunities. North Dakota Law Review71:187-210.
39.
Mele, Christopher, and Teresa A. Miller, eds. 2005. Civil penalties, social consequences. New York: Routledge.
40.
Myrdal, Gunnar. 1944. An American dilemma: The Negro problem and modern democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers.
41.
National Advisory Commission on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals. 1973. Report on corrections. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
42.
Office of the Pardon Attorney. 2000. Federal statutes imposing collateral consequences upon conviction. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
43.
Olivares, Kathleen M., Velmer S. Burton Jr., and Francis T. Cullen. 1997. The collateral consequences of a felony conviction: A national study of state legal codes ten years later. Federal Probation60:10-17.
44.
Pager, Devah. 2003. The mark of a criminal record. American Journal of Sociology108:937-975.
45.
Parkin, Frank. 1979. Marxism and class theory: A bourgeois critique. New York: Columbia University Press.
46.
Pettit, Becky, and Bruce Western. 2004. Mass imprisonment and the life course: Race and class inequality in U.S. incarceration. American Sociological Review69:151-169.
47.
Pettus, Katherine. 2005. Felony disenfranchisement in America: Historical origins, institutional racism, and modern consequences. New York: LFB Scholarly Publishing.
48.
Rowe, David C., and David P. Farrington. 1997. The familial transmission of criminal convictions. Criminology35:177-201.
49.
Samuels, Paul, and Debbie Mukamal. 2004. After prison: Roadblocks to reentry. A report on state legal barriers facing people with criminal records. New York: Legal Action Center.
50.
Steinacker, Andrea. 2003. The prisoner’s campaign: Felony disenfranchisement laws and the right to hold public office. Brigham Young University Law Review2003 (2): 801-828.
51.
Sutton, John R.2004. The political economy of imprisonment in affluent Western democracies, 1960-1990. American Sociological Review69:170-189.
52.
Travis, Jeremy. 2002. Invisible punishment: An instrument of social exclusion. In Invisible punishment: The collateral consequences of mass imprisonment, ed. Marc Mauer and Meda Chesney-Lind, 15-36. New York: New Press.
53.
Uggen, Christopher. 2000. Work as a turning point in the life course of criminals: A duration model of age, employment, and recidivism. American Sociological Review65:529-546.
54.
Uggen, Christopher. 2005. Editorial comment on collateral consequences of criminal sanctions. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice21:1.
55.
Uggen, Christopher, and Jeff Manza. 2002. Democratic contraction? Political consequences of felon disenfranchisement in the United States. American Sociological Review67:777-803.
56.
Uggen, Christopher, and Jeff Manza. 2004. Voting and subsequent crime and arrest: Evidence from a community sample. Columbia Human Rights Law Review36:193-215.
57.
Uggen, Christopher, Jeff Manza, and Angela Behrens. 2004. Less than the average citizen: Stigma, role transition, and the civic reintegration of convicted felons. In After crime and punishment: Pathways to offender reintegration, ed. Shadd Maruna and Russ Immarigeon, 258-290. Cullompton, Devon, UK: Willan.
58.
Uggen, Christopher, and Shelly Schaefer. 2005. Voting and the civic reintegration of former prisoners. Manuscript, Department of Sociology, University of Minnesota, Twin Cites.
59.
Uggen, Christopher, Sara Wakefield, and Bruce Western. 2005. Work and family perspectives on reentry. In Prisoner reentry and crime in America, ed. Jeremy Travis and Christy Visher, 209-243. New York: Cambridge University Press.
60.
U.S. Bureau of Prisons. 1948-1971. National prisoner statistics. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
61.
U.S. Census Bureau. 1998. Statistical abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
62.
U.S. Department of Justice. 1973-2004. Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
63.
U.S. Department of Justice. 1989. Recidivism of prisoners released in 1983. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
64.
U.S. Department of Justice. 1989-1997. Correctional populations in the United States. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
65.
U.S. Department of Justice. 1991. Race of prisoners admitted to state and federal institutions, 1926-1986. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
66.
U.S. Department of Justice. 1992. Recidivism of felons on probation, 1986-1989. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
67.
U.S. Department of Justice. 1994-2004. Prisoners in 2003. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
68.
U.S. Department of Justice. 1997. Characteristics of adults on probation, 1995. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
69.
U.S. Department of Justice. 1999. Compendium of state privacy and security legislation: 1999. Washington DC: Government Printing Office..
70.
U.S. Department of Justice. 2000a. Incarcerated parents and their children. Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
71.
U.S. Department of Justice. 2000b. Survey of inmates of state correctional facilities series, 1974-1997. [MRDF]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census/Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political Science Research [producer/distributor].
72.
U.S. Department of Justice. 2001a. Probation and parole in the United States, 2000. Press Release. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
73.
U.S. Department of Justice. 2001b. Trends in state parole 1990-2000. Washington, DC. Government Printing Office.
74.
U.S. Department of Justice. 2005. Prison and jail inmates at midyear 2004. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
75.
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. 2005. Investigative programs—Crimes against Children: State sex offender Web sites. http://www.fbi.gov/hq/cid/cac/states.htm (accessed September 3, 2005).
76.
van Parijs, Philippe. 1989. A revolution in class theory. In The debate on classes, ed. Erik Olin Wright, 213-241. London: Verso.
77.
Wacquant, Loic. 2001. Deadly symbiosis: When prison and ghetto meet and mesh. Punishment and Society3:95-134.
78.
Warner, W. Lloyd. 1936. American caste and class. American Journal of Sociology42:234-237.
79.
Weber, Max. 1922/1978. Economy and society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
80.
Western, Bruce. 2002. The impact of incarceration on wage mobility and inequality. American Sociological Review67:526-546.
81.
Wheelock, Darren. 2005. Collateral consequences and racial inequality: Felon status exclusions as a system of disadvantage. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice21:82-90.
82.
Wheelock, Darren, and Christopher Uggen. 2005. Race, poverty and punishment: The impact of criminal sanctions on racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic inequality. Paper presented at the National Poverty Center at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, September 15-16.
83.
Whelan, Christopher. 1996. Marginalization, deprivation, and fatalism in the Republic of Ireland: Class and underclass perspectives. European Sociological Review12:33-51.
84.
Wilson, William J.1987. The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
85.
Wolfgang, Marvin E.1983. Delinquency in two birth cohorts. In Prospective studies of crime and delinquency, ed. K. Teilmann Van Duesen and S. A. Mednick, 7-16. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
