Bertrand, M. , E. Duflo, and S. Mullainathan. 2002. How much should we trust differences in differences estimates? Working Paper 8841. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
2.
Bloom, H. Forthcoming. Learning more from social experiments: Evolving analytic approaches. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
3.
Boruch, R. F.2005. Comments on the papers by Rawlings and Duflo and Kremer. In Evaluating development effectiveness, ed. G. K. Pitman, O. N. Feinstein, and G. K. Ingram232-239. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
4.
Boruch, R. F. , and E. Foley. 2000. The Honestly Experimental Society: Sites and other entities as the units of allocation and analysis in randomized trials. In Validity and social experimentation: Donald Campbell's legacy, ed. L. Bickman193-238. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
Boruch, R. F. , P. M. Wortman, and D. Cordray, eds. 1981. Reanalyzing program evaluations: Policies and practices for secondary analysis of social and educational programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Bryk, A. S. , and S. W. Raudenbush. 1992. Hierarchical linear models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7.
Campbell, M. J. , A. Donner, and D. Elbourne, eds. 2001. Design and analysis of cluster randomized trials. Statistics in Medicine: Special Issue20 (1): 329-496.
8.
Campbell, M. K. , D. R. Elbourne, and D. G. Altman. 2004. CONSORT statement: Extension to cluster randomized trials. BMJ328:702-708.
9.
Davies P.2004. Evidence-based policy. The Jerry Lee Lecture, annual colloquium of the Campbell Collaboration, Washington DC.
10.
Donner, A. , and N. Klar. 2001. Design and analysis of cluster randomized trials in health research. London: Arnold.
11.
Federal Collaboration on WhatWorks . 2005. Draft report of the working group: The what works repository. Washington DC: Office of Justice Programs.
12.
Kellem, S. G. , and Y. V. Van Horn. 1997. Life course development, community epidemiology, and preventive trial. American Journal of Community Psychology. 25:177-187.
13.
Moher, D. , D. J. Cook, S. Eastwood, I. Olkin, D. Rennie, and D. Stroup, for the QUORUM Group. 1999. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials: The quorum statement. Lancet354:1896-1900.
14.
Moher, D. , K. F. Shulz, M. Egger, F. Davidoff, D. Elbourne. 2001. The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports on parallel group randomized trials. Lancet357:1191-2004.
15.
Murray, D. M.1998. Design and analysis of group randomized trials. New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
Pitman, G. K. , O. N. Feinstein, and G. K. Ingram, eds. 2005. Evaluating development effectiveness. Vol. 7 of World Bank Series on Evaluation and Development. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
17.
Rawlings, L.2005. Operational reflections on evaluating development programs. In Evaluating development effectiveness, ed. G. K. Pitman, O. N. Feinstein, and G. K. Ingram193-204. NewBrunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
18.
Turner, H. , R. Boruch, A. Petrosino, J. Lavenberg, D. de Moya, and H. Rothstein. 2003. Populating an international web-based randomized trials register in the social, behavioral, criminological, and education sciences. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science589:203-225.
19.
Wellford, C. F. , J. V. Pepper, and C. V. Petrie, eds. 2005. Firearms and violence: Acritical review. Washington, DC: National Research Council.