Using Place-Based Random Assignment and Comparative Interrupted Time-Series Analysis to Evaluate the Jobs-Plus Employment Program for Public Housing Residents
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May, 2005
Using Place-Based Random Assignment and Comparative Interrupted Time-Series Analysis to Evaluate the Jobs-Plus Employment Program for Public Housing Residents
This article describes a place-based research demonstration program to promote and sustain employment among residents of selected public housing developments in six U.S. cities. Because all eligible residents of the participating public housing developments were free to take part in the program, it was not possible to study its impacts in a classical experiment, with random assignment of individual residents to the program or a control group. Instead, the impact analysis is based on a design that selected matched groups of two or three public housing developments in each participating city and randomly assigned one to the program and the other(s) to a control group. In addition, an eleven-year comparative interrupted time-series analysis is being used to strengthen the place-based random assignment design. Preliminary analyses of baseline data suggest that this two-pronged approach will provide credible estimates of program impacts.
Aspen Institute . 1997. Voices from the field: Learning from the early work of comprehensive community initiatives. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
2.
Bloom, Howard S.2003. Using “short” interrupted time-series analysis to measure the impacts of wholeschool reforms: With applications to a study of accelerated schools. Evaluation Review27 (1): 3-49.
3.
Bloom, Howard S. , Johannes M. Bos, and Suk-Won Lee. 1999. Using cluster random assignment to measure program impacts: Statistical implications for the evaluation of education programs. Evaluation Review23 (4): 445-469.
4.
Bloom, Howard S. , James A.Riccio, and Nandita Verma. 2005. Promoting work in public housing: The effectiveness of Jobs-Plus. New York: MDRC.
5.
Bos, Johannes M. , Aletha C. Huston, Robert C. Granger, Greg J. Duncan, Thomas W. Brock, and Vonnie C. McLoyd. 1999. New hope for people with low incomes: Two-year results of a program to reduce poverty and reform welfare. New York: MDRC.
6.
Campbell, Donald T. , and Julian Stanley. 1966. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
7.
Cook, Thomas , and Donald T. Campbell. 1979. Quasi-experimental design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
8.
Gladwell, Malcolm . 2000. The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. Boston: Little, Brown.
9.
Hollister, Robinson G. , and Jennifer Hill. 1995. Problems in the evaluation of community-wide initiatives. In New approaches to evaluating community initiatives: Concepts, methods, and contexts, ed. James P. Connell, Anne C. Kubisch, Lisbeth B. Schorr, and Carol H. Weiss. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
10.
Kato, Linda Y.2002. The special challenges of offering employment programs in culturally diverse communities: The Jobs-Plus experience in public housing developments. New York: MDRC.
11.
Kato, Linda Y. , and James A. Riccio. 2001. Building new partnerships for employment: Collaboration among agencies and public housing residents in the jobs-plus demonstration. New York: MDRC.
12.
Kingsley, Thomas G. , Joseph B. McNeely, and James O. Gibson. 1997. Community building: Coming of age. Washington, DC: Development Training Institute, Inc., and the Urban Institute.
13.
Kornfeld, Robert , and Howard S. Bloom. 1999. Measuring program impacts on earnings and employment: Do unemployment insurance wage reports from employers agree with surveys of individuals?Journal of Labor Economics17 (1): 168-197.
14.
MDRC . 1999. Jobs-Plus baseline survey: Data resources book, Vol. I (site-by-site findings) and Vol. II (crosssite information). New York: MDRC.
15.
Michalopoulos, Charles , Doug Tattrie, Cynthia Miller, Philip K. Robins, Pamela Morris, David Gyarmati, Cindy Redcross, Kelly Foley, and Reuben Ford. 2002. Making work pay: Final report on the Self-Sufficiency Project for Long-Term Welfare Recipients. Ottawa, Canada: Social Research and Demonstration Corporation.
16.
Miller, Cynthia , and James A. Riccio. 2002. Making work pay for public housing residents: Financial incentive designs at six Jobs-Plus demonstration sites. New York: MDRC.
17.
Murray, D. M. , P. J. Hannan, D. R. Jacobs, P. J. McGovern, L. Schmid, W. L. Baker, and C. Gray. 1994. Assessing intervention effects in the Minnesota Heart Health Program. American Journal of Epidemiology139 (1): 91-103.
18.
Raudenbush, Stephen W.1997. Statistical analysis and optimal design in cluster randomized trials. Psychological Methods2 (2): 173-185.
19.
Riccio, James A.1999. Mobilizing public housing communities for work: Origins and early accomplishments of the Jobs-Plus demonstration. New York: MDRC.
20.
Shadish, William R. , Thomas D. Cook, and Donald T. Campbell. 2002. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
21.
Verma, Nandita . 2002. Residential mobility of public housing residents: Who moves and who stays?Implications for programs and evaluations of place-based initiatives. Manuscript, NewYork, MDRC.
22.
Walsh, Joan . 1997. Stories of renewal: Community building and the future of urban America. New York: Rockefeller Foundation.
23.
Wilson, William Julius . 1996. When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor. New York: Knopf.
