This article makes a conceptual and theoretical contribution to the study of diffusion. The authors suggest that the concept of diffusion be reserved for processes (not outcomes) characterized by a certain uncoordinated interdependence. Theoretically, the authors identify the principal sources of clustered policy reforms. They then clarify the characteristics specific to diffusion mechanisms and introduce a categorization of such processes. In particular, they make a distinction between two types of diffusion: adaptation and learning. They argue that this categorization adds conceptual clarity and distinguishes mechanisms with distinct substantive consequences.
Anselin, Luc.1988. Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
2.
Anselin, Luc, and Wendy K. Tam Cho. 2002. Spatial effects and ecological inference. Political Analysis10 (3): 276-297.
3.
Asch, Solomon E.1951. Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgement. In Groups, leadership, and men, ed. H. Guetzkow.Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Press.
Bennett, Colin J.1991. What is policy convergence and what causes it?British Journal of Political Science21 (2): 215-233.
6.
Bikhchandani, Sushil, David Hirshleifer, and Ivo Welch. 1998. Learning from the behavior of others: Conformity, fads, and informational cascades. Journal of Economic Perspectives12 (3): 151-170.
7.
Brady, Henry, and Paul Sniderman. 1985. Attitude attribution: A group basis for political reasoning. American Political Science Review60:880-898.
8.
Coleman, James S., Elihu Katz, and Herbert Menzel. 1966. Medical innovation: A diffusion study. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill Company.
9.
Coppedge, Michael, and Daniel Brinks. 1999. Patterns of diffusion in the third wave of democracy. Paper read at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, September 2-5, 1999, in Atlanta, GA.
10.
David, Paul. 1985. Clio and the economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review75:322-337.
11.
Davis, Gerald F., and Henrich R. Greve. 1997. Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s. American Journal of Sociology103:1-37.
12.
Deutsch, Karl Wolfgang. 1953. Nationalism and social communication: An inquiry into the foundations of nationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/New York: John Wiley.
13.
Dolowitz, David P., and David Marsh. 2000. Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making. Governance—An International Journal of Policy and Administration13 (1): 5-24.
14.
Drezner, Daniel W.2001. Globalization and policy convergence. International Studies Review3:55-78.
15.
Elkins, Zachary. 2003. Designed by diffusion: International networks and the spread of democracy. Doctoral diss., Department of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley.
16.
Elkins, Zachary, Andrew Guzman, and Beth A. Simmons. 2004. Competing for capital: The diffusion of bilateral investment treaties, 1960-2000. Paper read at the meetings of the American Political Science Association, in Chicago.
17.
Eyestone, Robert. 1977. Confusion, diffusion, and innovation. American Political Science Review71:441-447.
18.
Festinger, Leon. 1950. Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
19.
Fiske, Susan T., and Shelley E. Taylor. 1991. Social cognition. 2nd ed.New York: McGraw-Hill.
20.
Franzese, Robert J., and Jude C. Hays. 2004. Empirical modeling strategies for spatial independence. Paper read at the summer meeting of the Society for Political Methodology, in Palo Alto, CA.
21.
Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede, and Michael D. Ward. 2004. Diffusion and the international context of democratization. Manuscript.
22.
Granovetter, Mark S.1978. Threshold models of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology83:1420-1443.
23.
Haas, Peter. 1992. Knowledge, power, and international policy coordination. International Organization46:1-35.
24.
Huckfeldt, R. Robert, and John D. Sprague. 1995. Citizens, politics, and social communication: Information and influence in an election campaign. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Huntington, Samuel. 1991. The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
26.
Ikenberry, John G.1990. The international spread of privatization policies: Inducements, learning, and “policy bandwagoning.” In The political economy of public sector reform and privatization, ed. E. Suleiman and J. Waterbury.Boulder, CO: Westview.
27.
Jacoby, Wade. 2000. Imitation and politics: Redesigning modern Germany. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
28.
Kahneman, Daniel, Paul Slovic, and Amos Tversky. 1982. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Katz, Michael, and Carl Shapiro. 1985. Network externalities: Competition and compatibility. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings75:424-440.
30.
Katz, Michael, and Carl Shapiro. 1986. Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities. Journal of Political Economy94 (4): 822-841.
31.
Kerr, Clark. 1983. The future of industrial societies: Convergence or continuing diversity?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
Kopstein, Jeffrey, and David Reilly. 2000. Geographic diffusion and the transformation of the post communist world. World Politics53:1-37.
33.
Lazarsfeld, Paul F., and Robert Merton. 1954. Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. In Freedom and control in modern society, ed. M. Berger.New York: Van Nostrand.
34.
Lazer, David. 2005. Regulatory capitalism as a networked order: The international system as an informational network. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science598:52-66
35.
Levi-Faur, David. 2004. Response to Simmons and Elkins. Manuscript.
36.
Levi-Faur, David. 2005. The global diffusion of regulatory capitalism. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science598:12-32.
37.
Li, Richard P. Y., and William R. Thompson. 1975. The “coup contagion” hypothesis. Journal of Conflict Resolution19:63-88.
38.
Lupia, Arthur, and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1998. The democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Merton, Robert K.1968. Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.
40.
Meseguer, Covadonga. 2005. Policy learning, policy diffusion, and the making of a new order. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science598:67-82.
41.
Meyer, John, and Brian Rowan. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology83:340-363.
42.
Midlarsky, Manus I.1978. Analyzing diffusion and contagion effects: The urban disorders of the 1960’s. American Political Science Review72 (3): 996-1008.
43.
Milgram, Stanley. 1975. Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York: Harper & Row.
44.
Mizruchi, Mark S.1989. Similarity of political behavior among large American corporations. American Journal of Sociology95 (2): 401-424.
45.
O’Laughlin, John, Michael D. Ward, Corey L. Lofdahl, Jordin S. Cohen, David S. Brown, David Reilly, Kristian S. Gleditsch, and Michael Shin. 1998. The diffusion of democracy, 1946-1994. Annals of the Association of American Geographers88 (4): 545-574.
46.
Powell, Walter W., and Paul J. Dimaggio, eds. 1991. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47.
Rogers, Everett M.1995. The diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
48.
Rosenau, James N.1988. Patterned chaos in global life: Structure and process in the two worlds of world politics. International Political Science Review9 (4): 327-364.
49.
Rosenau, James N.1990. Turbulence in world politics: A theory of change and continuity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
50.
Ross, Marc Howard, and Elizabeth Homer. 1976. Galton’s problem in cross-national research. World Politics29 (1): 1-28.
51.
Rustow, Dankwart. 1970. Transitions to democracy: Toward a dynamic model. Comparative Politics2 (3): 337-363.
52.
Savage, Robert. 1985. Diffusion research traditions and the spread of policy innovation in the federal system. Publius15:1-27.
53.
Schelling, Thomas C.1978. Micromotives and macrobehavior. New York: Norton.
54.
Simmons, Beth A., and Zachary Elkins. 2004. The globalization of liberalization: Policy diffusion in the international political economy. American Political Science Review98 (1): 171-189.
55.
Starr, Harvey. 1991. Democratic dominoes: Diffusion approaches to the spread of democracy in the international system. Journal of Conflict Resolution35 (2): 356-381.
56.
Strang, David. 1991. Adding social structure to diffusion models: An event history framework. Sociological Methods and Research19 (3): 324-353.
57.
Strang, David, and Sarah A. Soule. 1998. Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual Review of Sociology24:265-290.
58.
Walker, Jack L.1969. The diffusion of innovation among American states. American Political Science Review63:880-899.
59.
Ward, Michael D., and Kristian Skrede Gleditsch. 2002. Location, location, location: An Mcmc approach to modeling the spatial context of war and peace. Political Analysis10 (3): 244-260.
60.
Westney, D. Eleanor. 1987. Imitation and innovation: The transfer of Western organizational patterns to Meiji Japan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,.
61.
Weyland, Kurt Gerhard. 2004. Learning from foreign models in Latin American policy reform. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
62.
Whitehead, Laurence. 1986. International aspects of democratization. In Transitions from authoritarian rule: Comparative perspectives, ed. Guillermo O’Donnell, Phillippe Schmitter, and Laurence Whitehead.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
63.
Wilson, Graham. 2004. On spots and leopards: The malleability of regulatory systems and the limits of learning. Manuscript.
