The liberal institutionalization of world politics has engendered a vibrant debate over its form and its content. The proposals range from those aiming at the democratization of international institutions to those that aim to modify them at the margins. This contribution proposes that the democratization of social institutions has both an internal (within an organization or sector) and an external (in relation to whole political economy) dimension. Not surprisingly, unions and environmentalists have limited influence on international institutions when compared to corporations and liberal economic ministries. There is enough evidence, however, that liberal elites are advocating the selective inclusion of liberal unionists and environmentalists at the expense of social unionists and environmentalists. In addition to other responses, social unions and environmentalists should make internal democratization a priority and should utilize domestic fora, where unions and environmentalists have more access and resources, in a manner that embeds domestic tactics within inclusive internationalist strategies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bachrach, Peter, and Aryeh Botwinick .1992. Power and empowerment: A radical theory of participatory democracy. Philadelphia : Temple University Press.
2.
Bernstein, Stephen.2000. Ideas, social structure and the compromise of liberal environmentalism. European Journal of International Relations6 (4): 464-512.
3.
Boswell, Terry, and Christopher Chase-Dunn .2000. The spiral of capitalism and socialism: Toward global democracy. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
4.
Bowman, Scott.1993. The ideology of transnational enterprise. Social Science Journal30 (1): 47-68.
5.
Cox, Robert. [1991] 1995. The global political economy and social choice. In Approaches to world order, edited by R. W. Cox with T. J. Sinclair, 191-208. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Cutler, A. Claire.2001. Critical reflections on the Westphalian assumption of international law and organization: A crisis of legitimacy. Review of International Studies27:133-50.
7.
Cutler, A. Claire, Virginia Haufler, and Tony Porter.1999. Private authority and international affairs. In Private authority and international affairs, edited by A. Claire Cutler, Virginia Haufler, and Tony Porter, 3-28. Albany: State University of New York Press.
8.
Deacon, Bob, with Michele Hulse and Paul Stubbs.1997. Global social policy: International organizations and the future of welfare. London: Sage.
9.
Egan, Daniel, and David Levy.2001. International environmental politics and the internationalization of the state: The cases of climate change and the multilateral agreement on investment. In The international political economy of the environment: Critical perspectives. Vol. 12 of IPE Yearbook, edited by D. Stevis and V J. Assetto, 63-83. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
10.
Esping-Andersen, Gosta.1990. The three worlds of capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
Furniss, Norman, and Neil Mitchell.1984. Social welfare provisions in western Europe: Current status and future possibilities. In Public policy and social institutions, edited by Harrell R. Rodgers Jr., 15-54. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
12.
Gerth, Jeff.1998. Where business rules: Forging global regulations that put industry first. New York Times, 9 January, national edition, C1.
13.
Halliday, Fred.1987. State and society in international relations: A second agenda. Millennium: Journal of International Studies16 (2): 215-29.
14.
Harrod, Jeffrey.1987. Production, power and the unprotected worker. New York: Columbia University Press.
15.
International Confederation of Trade Unions (ICFTU).2000. Globalising social justice: Trade unionism in the twenty-first century. Brussels, Belgium: International Confederation of Trade Unions.
16.
Marshall, T.H. [1963] 1964. Class, citizenship and social development. Garden City, NY: Doubleday .
17.
Misra, Ramesh.1999. Beyond the nation state: Social policy in an age of globalization . In Transnational social policy, edited by C. Jones Finer, 29-48. Oxford , UK: Blackwell.
18.
Mol, A.P.J., and G. Spaargaren.2000. Ecological modernization theory in debate: A review. Environmental Politics9 (1): 17-49.
19.
Murray, Douglas, and Laura Raynolds.2000. Alternative trade in bananas: Obstacles and opportunities for progressive social change in the global economy. Agriculture and Human Values17:65-74.
20.
Newell, Peter, ed.1999. Globalization and the governance of the environment. IDS Bulletin30:3.
21.
O'Brien, Robert, Anne M. Goetz, Jan A. Scholte, and Marc Williams.2000. Contesting global governance: Multilateral economic institutions and global social movements. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), ed. 1997. Societal cohesion and the globalizing economy: What does the future hold? Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
23.
Pearson, Ruth, and Gill Seyfang.2001. New hope or false dawn? Voluntary codes of conduct, labor regulation and social policy in a globalizing world. Global Social Policy1 (1): 49-78.
24.
Picciotto, Sol.2001. Liberalization and democratization: The forum and the hearth in the era of cosmopolitan post-industrial capitalism. Law and Contemporary Problems63 (4): 157-78.
25.
Salinas de Gortari, Carlos, and Roberto Mangabeira Unger.1999. The market turn without neoliberalism. Challenge42 (1): 14-33.
26.
Schwab, Klaus, and Claude Smadja.1996. Davos: Mondialisation et responsabilité sociale. Le Monde, 17 July, 10.
27.
"Seattle: December '99?" 2000Millennium: Journal of International Studies29 (1): 103-40.
28.
Shapiro, Ian, and Casiano Hacker-Cordón, eds. 1999a. Democracy's edges . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Stevis, Dimitris.1998. International labor organizations, 1864-1997: The weight of history and the challenges of the present. Journal of World-Systems Research4 (1): 52-75. Available from http://csf.colorado.edu/wsystems/jwsr.html .
31.
—. 1999. Agents, subjects, objects and phantoms: Form and purpose in international policies. Paper presented at the International Studies Association convention, Washington, DC, February.
Stevis, Dimitris, and Terry Boswell.2001. Labor policy and politics in international integration: Comparing NAFTA and the European Union. In The politics of social inequality, edited by B. Dobratz, L. Waldner, and T. Buzzell , 335-64. Amsterdam: JAI/ Elsevier.
34.
Stevis, Dimitris, and Stephen Mumme.2001. Rules and politics in international integration: Environmental regulation in NAFTA and the EU. Environmental Politics9 (4): 20-42.
35.
Tanzi, Vito, Ke-young Chu , and Sanjeev Gupta, eds. 1999. Economic policy and equity. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
36.
Tsogas, George.2001. Labor regulation in a global economy. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
37.
United Nations.2001. The global compact. New York: United Nations . Available from http://www.unglobalcompact.org.
38.
Williams, Mark.2001. In search of global standards: The political economy of trade and the environment. In The international political economy of the environment: Critical perspectives. Vol. 12 of IPE Yearbook , edited by D. Stevis and V. J. Assetto, 39-61. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
39.
World Bank.2000. World development report 2000/2001: Attacking poverty. New York: Oxford University Press.
40.
Young, Iris M.1990. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
41.
—. 2000. Inclusion and democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
