Boruch, Robert , Anthony Petrosino, and Iain Chalmers. 1999. The Campbell Collaboration: A proposal for systematic, multi-national, and continuous reviews of evidence. Background paper for the meeting at University College–London, School of Public Policy, London, July.
2.
Chalmers, Iain , and Douglas Altman. 1995. Systematic reviews. London: British Medical Journal Press.
3.
Cullen, Francis , and Paul Gendreau. 2000. Assessing correctional rehabilitation: Policy, practice, and prospects. In Policies, processes, and decisions of the criminal justice system: Criminal justice 3, edited by Julie Horney. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
4.
Davies, Huw T. O. , Sandra Nutley, and Peter Smith. 2000. What works: Evidence-based policy and practice in public services. London: Policy Press.
5.
Davies, Philip . 1999. What is evidence-based education?British Journal of Educational Studies47:108-121.
6.
Egger, Matthias , and G. Davey Smith. 1998. Bias in location and selection of studies. British Medical Journal316:61-66.
7.
Farrington, David , and Anthony Petrosino. 2001. The Campbell Collaboration Crime and Justice Group. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science58:35-49.
8.
Farrington, David , and Brandon Welsh, eds. 2001. What works in preventing crime? Systematic reviews of experimental and quasi-experimental research. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science578-578.
9.
Farrington, David P. , and Anthony Petrosino. 2000. Systematic reviews of criminological interventions: The Campbell Collaboration Crime & Justice Group. International Annals of Criminology38(1/2): 49-66.
10.
MacKenzie, Doris . 2000. Evidence-based corrections: Identifying what works. Crime and Delinquency46:457-471.
11.
Millenson, Michael L.1997. Demanding medical excellence: Doctors and accountability in the information age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
Mosteller, Frederick , and Robert Boruch. 2002. Evidence matters: Randomized trials in education. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
13.
Nutley, Sandra , and Huw T. O. Davies. 1999. The fall and rise of evidence in criminal justice. Public Money and Management19:47-54.
14.
Petrosino, Anthony , Robert Boruch, David Farrington, Lawrence Sherman, and David Weisburd. Forthcoming. Toward evidence-based criminal justice and criminology: Systematic reviews, the Campbell Collaboration, and the Campbell Crime and Justice Group. International Journal of Comparative Criminology.
15.
Petrosino, Anthony , Robert Boruch, Haluk Soydan, Lorna Duggan, and Julio Sanchez-Meca. 2001. Meeting the challenges of evidence-based policy: The Campbell Collaboration. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science578:14-34.
16.
Shepherd, Jonathan . Forthcoming. Explaining feast or famine in randomised field trials: Medical science and criminology compared. Evaluation Review.
17.
Sherman, Lawrence . 1998. Evidence-based policing. Washington, DC: Police Foundation.
18.
Sherman, Lawrence , David Farrington, Brandon Welsh, and Doris MacKenzie, eds. 2002. Evidence based crime prevention. New York: Routledge.
19.
Sherman, Lawrence , Denise Gottfredson, Doris MacKenzie, John Eck, Peter Reuter, and Shawn Bushway. 1997. Preventing crime: What works, what doesn’t, what’s promising: A report to the United States Congress. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
20.
Visher, Christy A. , and David Weisburd. 1998. Identifying what works: Recent trends in crime prevention. Crime, Law and Social Change28:223-242.
21.
Zuger, Abigail . 1997. New way of doctoring: By the book. The New York Times, 16 December.
