While community colleges pride themselves on their inclusiveness, they tend not to enroll many of the lowest performing students leaving high schools, most of the disconnected youth who have dropped out of high school, and many low-income adults. This article explores the possibility of using noncredit education as a bridging mechanism to allow such students to enter the community college. Noncredit programs have many advantages including lower cost; greater accessibility, flexibility, and responsiveness; and greater access to immigrants. Some noncredit centers have worked hard to develop smooth transitions to the credit programs of their colleges. While noncredit education has great promise as a mechanism for expanding access to community colleges, it also faces familiar problems: inadequate funding, low status, inadequate support services, and developing in adequate articulation mechanisms with credit programs. Finally, community colleges cannot by themselves resolve the problems of inadequate schooling and poverty, and a variety of complementary social and economic policies must also be developed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Balmuth, M. 1985. Essential characteristics of effective adult literacy programs A review and analysis of the research. The Adult Beginning Reader Project. New York: State Department of Education.
2.
———. 1988. Recruitment and retention in adult basic education: What does the research say? Journal of Reading31 (7): 620-23.
3.
California Tomorrow. (2002). A new look at California community colleges: Keeping the promise alive for students of color and immigrants. Unpublished manuscript, California Tomorrow, Oakland, CA.
4.
Cameron, S., and J. Heckman. 1993. The non-equivalence of high school equivalents. Journal of Labor Economics11 (1): 34-56.
5.
Cohen, A. M., and F. B. Brawer. 1989. The American community college. 2d ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
D’Amico, R., A. Martinez, J. Salzman, and R. Wagner. 2002. An evaluation of the Individual Training Account/Eligible Training Provider Demonstration. Research and Evaluation Monograph series 02-A. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.
7.
Darkenwald, G. G. 1986. Effective approaches to teaching basic skills to adults: A research synthesis. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service no. ED 325 631).
8.
Dewey, J. 1938. Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.
9.
Diekhoff, G. M. 1988. An appraisal of adult literacy programs: Reading between the lines. Journal of Reading31 (7): 624-30.
10.
Esping-Anderson, E. 1990. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
Fischer, R., and D. Cordray. 1996. Job training and welfare reform: A policy-driven synthesis. New York: Russell Sage.
12.
Gittell, M., and T. Steffy. 2000. Community colleges addressing students’ needs: A case study of LaGuardia Community College. New York: Howard Samuels State Management and Policy Center, City University of New York.
13.
Grubb, W. N. 1987. The postsecondary vocational education of 1980 seniors. LSB-87-4-10. Washington, DC: MPR Associates for the Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
14.
———. 1995. Education through occupations in American high schools. 2 volumes. New York: Teachers College Press.
15.
———. 1999. Learning and earning in the middle: The economic benefits of sub-baccalaureate education. Occasional paper. New York: Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University.
16.
———. 2001. “Getting into the world”: Career counseling in community colleges. Occasional paper. New York: Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University.
17.
Grubb, W. N., and Associates. 1999. Honored but invisible: An inside look at teaching in community colleges. New York: Routledge.
18.
Grubb, W. N., and J. Kalman. 1994. Relearning to earn: The role of remediation in vocational education and job training. American Journal of Education103 (1): 54-93.
19.
Grubb, W. N., and M. Lazerson. 2002. The vocational roles of American schooling: Believers, dissenters, and the education gospel. Unpublished manuscript.
20.
Grubb, W. N., and L. McDonnell. 1996. Combating program fragmentation: Local systems of vocational education and job training. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management15 (2): 252-70.
21.
Javar, J., and S. Wandner. 2002. Use of intermediaries to provide training and employment services: Experience under WIA, JTPA, and Wagner-Peyser Programs. In Job training in the United States: History, effectiveness, and prospects, edited by C. O’Leary, R. Straits, and S. Wandner. Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
22.
Katz, M. 2001. The price of citizenship: Redefining the American welfare state. New York: Henry Holt.
23.
Kazemek, F. 1988. Necessary changes: Professional involvement in adult literacy programs. Harvard Educational Review58 (4): 464-87.
24.
LaLonde, R. 1995. The promise of public sector–sponsored training programs. Journal of Economic Perspectives9 (2): 149-68.
25.
Mahaffy, J. E. 1983. Impact evaluation of adult basic education: Program outcomes. Final report. Helena, MT: Office of Public Instruction.
26.
Matus-Grossman, L., and S. Gooden. 2002. Opening doors: Students’ perspectives on juggling work, family, and college. New York: MDRC.
27.
Murnane, R., J. Willett, and K. P. Boudett. 1995. Do high school dropouts benefit from obtaining a GED? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis17 (2): 133-48.
28.
O’Neill, D., and J. O’Neill. 1997. Lessons for welfare reform: An analysis of the AFDC caseload and past welfare-to-work programs. Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
29.
Osterman, P., and Lautsch, B. 1996. Project QUEST: A report to the Ford Foundation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Sloan School of Management.
30.
Quinn, L., and M. Haberman. 1986. Are GED certificate holders ready for postsecondary education? Metropolitan Education2:72-82.
31.
Roberts, B. 2002. The best of both: Community colleges and community-based organizations partner to better serve low-income workers. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.
32.
The role of non-credit courses in the future of community colleges. Information bulletin. 2001. Los Angeles: ERIC Clearinghouse for Community Colleges, University of California, Los Angeles.
33.
Rothstein, Richard. 2002. Linking infant mortality to schooling and stress. New York Times, 6 February, p. A20.
34.
Solorzano R., B. Stecher, and M. Perez. 1989. Reducing illiteracy in California Review of effective practices in adult literacy programs. Report for the California State Department of Education, Adult Education Division. Pasadena, CA: Educational Testing Service.
35.
Sticht, T. 1988. Adult literacy education. In Review of research in education, Vol. 15, edited by E. Rothkopf, 59-96. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
36.
Strawn, J. 1998. Beyond job search or basic education: Rethinking the role of skills in welfare reform. Washington, DC: Center for Law and Social Policy.
37.
U.S. Department of Labor. 1995. What’s working (and what’s not): A summary of research on the economic impacts of employment and training programs. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of the Chief Economist.
38.
Young, M., N. Fitzgerald, and M. Morgan. 1994. National evaluation of adult education programs, fourth report. Learner outcomes and program results. Arlington, VA: Development Associates for the U.S. Department of Education.
