Temporary Aid to Needy Families (TANF) has dramatically decreased welfare rolls, but has it reduced the college attendance rate of welfare recipients or limited the college enrollment of those who might have been on welfare without this policy change? The authors examine whether the work-first emphasis of welfare reform has reduced postsecondary education enrollment, principally in community colleges. Second, they consider whether welfare reform has increased enrollment in short-term, noncredit programs at the expense of degree-granting curricula. Third, they assess whether states with more restrictive formal policies regarding higher education have lower enrollment of welfare recipients than those with less restrictive policies. Finally, they examine whether welfare reform has affected the enrollment rates of young single mothers who might have been on welfare in the absence of TANF. They review enrollment data from a variety of sources and present original analyses of data on postsecondary enrollment patterns from multiple national data sets.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Association of Community Colleges. 1999. Community college involvement in welfare. Available from www.aacc.nche.edu/research/welfare.htm.
2.
Applied Research Center. 2001. Welfare reform as we know it. Oakland, CA: Applied Research Center.
3.
Brauner, Sarah, and Pamela Loprest. 1999. Where are they now? What states’ studies of people who left welfare tell us. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
4.
Brock, Thomas, Laura C. Nelson, and Megan Reiter. 2002. Readying welfare recipients for work: Lessons from four big cities as they implement welfare reform. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.
5.
Carnevale Anthony P., and Donna M. Desrochers. 1999. Getting down to business: Matching welfare recipients skills to jobs that train. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
6.
Center for Law and Social Policy (CLASP). 2002. Forty states likely to cut access to postsecondary training or education under House-passed bill. Available from http://www.clasp.org/pubs/jobseducation/Postsec_survey_061902.htm.
7.
Cohen, Marie. 1998. Postsecondary education under welfare reform. Welfare Information Network Issue Notes 2 (8). Available from www.welfareinfo.org.
8.
Cox, K. L., and W. E. Spriggs. 2002. Negative effects of TANF on college enrollment. Washington, DC: National Urban League Institute for Opportunity and Equality.
9.
Florida Education and Training Placement Information Program. 2001. Annual outcomes report. Fall 2000 data. Tallahassee: Florida Department of Education.
10.
Friedman, Pamela. 1999. Post-secondary education options for low-income adults. Welfare Information Network Issue Notes 3 (12). Available from http://www.welfareinfo.org/postseced2.htm.
11.
Gittell, Marilyn, Margaret Schehl, and Camille Fareri. 1990. From welfare to independence: The college options. New York: Ford Foundation.
12.
Greenberg Mark, Julie Strawn, and Lisa Plimpton. 1999. State opportunities to provide access to postsecondary education under TANF. Washington, DC: Center for Law and Social Policy.
13.
Hays, Sharon. 2003. Flat broke with children. New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
Institute for Higher Education Policy. 2002. The policy of choice: Expanding student options in higher education. Washington, DC: Institution for Higher Education Policy.
15.
Institute for Women’s Policy Research. 1998. Welfare reform and postsecondary education: Research and policy update. Available from http://www.iwpr.org/wnn10.htm.
16.
Jacobs Jerry A., and Rosalind B. King. 2002. Age and college completion: A life history analysis of women aged 15 through 44, Sociology of Education75:211-30.
17.
Jacobs, Jerry A., and Lauren Rich. 1998. Returning to school: Determinants and consequences. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Sociology, University of Pennsylvania.
18.
Lavin, David. 2001. Unpublished tabulations, Department of Sociology, City of New York Graduate Center.
19.
Loprest Pamela. 1999. Families who left welfare: Who are they and how are they doing? Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
20.
Manzo, David. 1997. The influence of federal and state welfare reform on adult education. ED412-332. Available from http://www.edrs.com.
21.
Marini Margaret Mooney. 1978. The transition to adulthood: Sex differences in educational attainment and age at marriage, American Sociological Review : 43 (4) 483-507.
22.
Mazzeo, Christopher, Sara, Rab, and Susan Eachus. 2003.Work-first or work-only: Welfare reform, state policy, and access to postsecondary education. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science586: 144-71.
23.
National Center for Education Statistics. 1997. National Postsecondary Student Aid Study. 1995-96 (NPSAS:96) methodology report. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
24.
———. 2002. National Postsecondary Student Aid Study. 1999-2090 (NPSAS:2000) methodology report. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
25.
Pennsylvania Office of Income Maintenance, Bureau of Employment and Training. 2002. PA TANF all family and post-24-month caseload and activities report for March 2002. Harrisburg: Pennsylvania Department of Human Services. Available from http://www.state.il.us/agency/dhs/comtx899.htm.
26.
Peterson, Janie, Xue Song, and Avis Jones-DeWeever. 2002. Life after welfare reform: Low-income single parent families, pre- and post-TANF. No. D446.Washington, DC: Institute for Women’s Policy Research Publication.
27.
Pierre, Robert. 1997. Trading textbooks for jobs. Washington Post, 29 December, p. A1.
28.
Seguino, Stephanie, and Sandy Butler. 1998. Struggling to make ends meet in the Maine economy: A study of former and current AFDC/TANF recipients. Joint Project of the Women’s Development Institute and the Maine Center for Economic Policy. Available from http://www.mecep.org/report-endmeet.htm.
29.
Shaw, Kathleen M., and Sara Rab. 2003. Market rhetoric versus reality in policy and practice: The Workforce Investment Act and access to community college education and training. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 586: 172-93.
30.
Spalter-Roth, Roberta, Beverly Burr, Heidi Hartmann, and Lois Shaw. 1995.Welfare that works: The working lives of AFDC recipients. Washington, DC: Institute for Women’s Policy Research.
31.
State Policy Documentation Project. 2000. Work requirements: Postsecondary education. Available from http://www.spdp.org/tanf/postsecondary.PDF.
32.
Teachman, Jay D., and Karen A. Polonko. 1988. Marriage, parenthood and the college enrollment of men and women. Social Forces67 (2): 512-23.
33.
U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. 1999. Second annual report to Congress on the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
34.
———. 2002. Second annual report to Congress on the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
35.
U.S. General Accounting Office. 1999. Welfare reform: Information on former recipients’ status. GAO/HEHS-99-48. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
36.
Washington State Department of Social and Health Services. 2002. Economic Services Administration ESA briefing book state fiscal year 2000: A reference for programs, caseloads, and expenditures. Available from www.wa.gov/dshs/esa/briefingbook.htm.
