Engagement is the vogue of relevant scholars into the twenty-first century. Yet there are concerns that scholarly objectivity requires detachment from society. The American experience with scholarly engagement comes from Land-Grant universities and extension. The Land-Grant principle emerged from the mandate to the Land-Grant colleges to improve the nation’s agriculture. Agricultural science has been hugely productive because of the Land-Grant principle. The principle is general to all scholarship. The Land-Grant principle gives both intellectual and political power to engagement. Scholarship is made better substantially through the test of workability, a dimension of scholarly objectivity. The scholar is also made more skillful. The engagement making possible the test of workability makes the scholarship more relevant. Institutionalized access to the workable, relevant knowledge for those who need it generates substantial political power. At a time when universities, particularly public research universities, are seeking public support for more than their teaching, the strategies suggested by the Land-Grant principle are instructive.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alston, Julian M., and Philip G. Pardey. 1996. Making science pay: The economics of agricultural R&D policy. Washington, DC: AEI Press.
2.
American Association for Higher Education. 2002. Knowledge for what? The engaged scholar. 2001. Conference announcement for tenth American Association for Higher Education Conference on Faculty Roles and Rewards, 25-27 January, Phoenix, AZ.
3.
Blank, Steven C. 1998. The end of agriculture in the American portfolio. Westport, CT: Quorum.
4.
Blaug, Mark. 1980. The methodology of economics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Bok, Derek. 1990. Universities and the future of America. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
6.
Bottom, John. Personal communication, 11 May 1992.
7.
Boyer, Ernest L. 1990. Scholarship reconsidered—Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
8.
Busch, Lawrence, and William B. Lacy. 1983. Science, agriculture, and the politics of research. Boulder, CO: Westview.
9.
Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. 2001. The carnegie classification of institutions of higher education, 2000 edition, with foreword by Lee S. Shulman. Available from http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/Classification/index.htm.
10.
Eddy, Edward Danforth, Jr. 1957. Colleges for our land and time: The land-grant idea in American education. New York: Harper & Brothers.
11.
Feldman, Kenneth A. 1987. Research productivity and scholarly accomplishment of college teachers as related to their instructional effectiveness: A review and exploration. Research in Higher Education26 (3): 227.
12.
Feller, Irwin, L. Kaltreider, P. Madden, D. Moore, and L. Sims. 1984. Overall study report: Findings and recommendations. Vol. 5, The agricultural technology delivery system: A study of agricultural and food related technologies. Prepared for Science and Education, U. S. Department of Agriculture. University Park, PA: Institute for Policy Research and Evaluation, Pennsylvania State University.
13.
Graubard, Stephen R. 1997. The American academic profession. Daedalus fall: v, vi.
14.
Hatzios, Kriton. 2002. Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station annual report, 2000-2001. Blacksburg, VA: College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Virginia Tech.
15.
Huffman, Wallace E., and Robert E. Evenson. 1993. Science for agriculture. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
16.
Johnson, Glenn L., and Lewis K. Zerby. 1973. What economists do about values. East Lansing: Department of Agricultural Economics, Center for Rural Manpower and Public Affairs, Michigan State University.
17.
Kellogg Commission on the Future of State and Land-Grant Universities. 1999. Returning to our roots: The engaged institution. Washington, DC: National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges.
18.
Kellogg Presidents’ Commission. 1996. Joint statement, Kellogg Presidents’ Commission on the 21st Century State and Land-Grant University. Washington, DC: National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges. Retrieved 19 April 2000 from http://www.nasulgc.org/Kellog/STATEMENTS/comstate.html.
19.
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1970. Logic of discovery or psychology of research? In Criticism and the growth of knowledge, edited by Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20.
McDowell, George R. 1992. The new political economy of extension education for agriculture and rural communities. American Journal of Agricultural Economics December: 1249-55.
21.
———. 2001. Land-grant universities and extension into the 21st century: Renegotiating or abandoning a social contract. Ames: Iowa State Press.
22.
Miller, Paul A. 2001. Foreword. In Land-grant universities and extension into the 21st century, edited by George R. McDowell. Ames: Iowa State Press.
23.
Perie, Marianne, Zhongren Jing, Roy Pearson, Joel D. Sherman, and Thomas D. Snyder. 1997. International education indicators: A time series perspective. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
24.
Peters, Scott Joseph. 1998. Extension work as public work: Reconsidering extension’s civic mission. Ph.D. diss., University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
25.
Rainsford, George N. 1972. Congress and higher education in the nineteenth century. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
26.
Taylor, John F. A. 1966. The masks of society. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
27.
———. 1981. The public commission of the university. New York: New York University Press.
28.
Texas A&M University. 2001. News Release: July 27, Texas agricultural extension service changing name, keeping commitments. College Station, Texas: Texas A&M University.
29.
Wilson, Charles. 1979. Reconciling national, international and local roles of universities with the essential character of a university. In Pressures and priorities—Report of the proceedings of the Twelfth Congress of the Universities of the Commonwealth. London: Association of Commonwealth Universities.
