Meta-analysis was designed to synthesize empirical relationships across studies, such as the effects of a specific crime prevention intervention on criminal offending behavior. Meta-analysis focuses on the size and direction of effects across studies, examining the consistency of effects and the relationship between study features and observed effects. The findings from meta-analysis not only reveal robust empirical relationships but also identify existing weaknesses in the knowledge base. Furthermore, meta-analytic results can easily be translated into summary statistics useful for informing public policy regarding effective crime prevention efforts.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Becker, Betsy J.1992. Models of Science Achievement: Forces Affecting Performance in School Science. In Meta-analysis for Explanation: A Casebook , ed. Thomas D. Cook, Harris Cooper, David S. Cordray , Heidi Hartmann, Larry V. Hedges, Richard J. Light, Thomas A. Louis, and Frederick Mosteller.New York: Russell Sage.
2.
Becker, G.1996. The Meta-Aanalysis of Factor Analyses: An Illustration Based on the Cumulation of Correlation Matrices. Psychological Methods1:341-53.
Farrington, David P. and Rolf Loeber.2000. Some Benefits of Dichotomization in Psychiatric and Criminological Research. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health10:100-122.
5.
Fisher, Ronald A.1944. Statistical Methods for Research Workers. 9th ed. London: Oliver and Boyd.
6.
Gallagher, Catherine A., David B. Wilson, and Doris Layton MacKenzie . N.d. A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Sexual Offender Treatment Programs. Unpublished manuscript, University of Maryland at College Park .
7.
Glass, Gene V.1976. Primary, Secondary and Meta-Analysis of Research . Educational Researcher5:3-8.
8.
Gleser, Leon J. and Ingram Olkin.1994. Stochastically Dependent Effect Sizes . In The Handbook of Research Synthesis, ed. Harris Cooper and Larry V Hedges.New York: Russell Sage .
9.
Hedges, Larry V.1982. Estimating Effect Size from a Series of Independent Experiments . Psychological Bulletin92: 490-99.
10.
Hedges, Larry V. and Ingram Olkin.1985. Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
11.
Hunter, John E. and Frank L. Schmidt .1990. Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12.
Kalaian, H.A. and Stephen W. Raudenbush .1996. A Multivariate Mixed Linear Model For Meta-Analysis. Psychological Methods1:227-35.
13.
Lipsey, Mark W., Gabrielle L. Chapman, and Nana A. Landenberger. 2001. Cognitive-Behavioral Programs for Offenders. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science578:144-157.
14.
Lipsey, Mark W., Scott Crosse, J. Dunkle, J. Pollard, and G. Stobart.1985. Evaluation: The State of the Art and the Sorry State of the Science. New Directions forProgramEvaluation27:7-28.
15.
Lipsey, Mark W. and David B. Wilson .2001. Practical Meta-Analysis . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
MacKenzie, Doris Layton, David B. Wilson, and Suzanne B. Kider .2001. Effects of Correctional Boot Camps on Offending. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science578:126-143.
17.
Pearson, Karl.1904. Report on Certain Enteric Fever Inoculation Statistics . British Medical Journal3:1243-46. Quoted in Morton Hunt, How Science Takes Stock: The Story of Meta-Analysis (New York: Russell Sage, 1997).
18.
Petrosino, Anthony, Robert F. Boruch, Haluk Soydan, Lorna Duggan, and Julio Sanchez-Meca .2001. Meeting the Challenges of Evidence-Based Policy: The Campbell Collaboration. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science578:14-34.
19.
Premack, Steven L. and John E. Hunter.1988. Individual Unionization Decisions . Psychological Bulletin103: 223-34.
20.
Rosenthal, Robert.1991. Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research. Applied Social Research Methods Series. Vol. 6. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21.
Rosenthal, Robert and Donald B. Rubin .1983. A Simple, General Purpose Display of Magnitude of Experimental Effect. Journal of Educational Psychology74:166-69.
22.
Wang, Morgan C. and Brad J. Bushman .1998. Integrating Results Through Meta-Analytic Review Using SAS Software. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
23.
Wilson, David B. and Mark W. Lipsey. In press. The Role of Method in Treatment Effect Estimates: Evidence from Psychological, Behavioral, and Educational Treatment Intervention Meta-Analyses. Psychological Methods.
