The research reported in this article set out to explore the variation in political knowledge over time during the 2000 presidential primaries. Knowledge is broken down into three distinct types: candidate awareness, biography, and policy. Results show that citizens did learn substantive amounts of information during the campaign and that learning and overall levels of knowledge were most pronounced in respondents who lived in a state where a primary was held and was competitive.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Dahl, R.A.1989. Dilemmas of Pluralist Democracy: Autonomy vs. Control . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
2.
—. 1998. On Democracy. New Haven, CT : Yale University Press.
3.
Delli Carpini, M.X. and S. Keeter.1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
4.
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall, Richard Johnston, Michael Hagan, David Dutwin, Kate Kenski, Kimberly Kirn, Suzanne Morse, Daniel Orr, Erika Prosper, Lesley Sillaman, and Paul Waldman.2000. The Primary Campaign: What Did the Candidates Say, What Did the Public Learn, and Did It Matter? Philadelphia : Annenberg Public Policy Center.
5.
Mondak, J.J.2000. Reconsidering the Measurement of Political Knowledge. PoliticalAnalysis8:57-82.
