This paper addresses the critical responses by Guglielmino (1989), Long (1989), and McCune (1989) to my earlier paper (Field, 1989) questioning the structure, validity, and reliability of the SDLRS. In this response, I review the evidence for the claims I proposed in my earlier criticism of the SDLRS, consider the evidence that Guglielmino, Long, and McCune present, and conclude that the SDLRS does not measure readiness for self-directed learning.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Brookfield, S.
(1984). Self-directed adult learning: A critique of research and theory. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Adult Education Research Conference, (pp. 14-19). Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University.
2.
Field, L. D.
(1989). An investigation into the structure, validity, and reliability of Guglielmino's self-directed learning scale. Adult Education Quarterly, 39,125-139.
3.
Guglielmino, L (1988). [Item-test correlation & reliability estimate for 3151 respondents to the SDLRS]. Unpublished raw data.
4.
Guglielmino, L. M.
(1989). Guglielmino responds to Field's investigation. Adult Education Quarterly, 39,235-240.
5.
Guglielmino, P. J.
, Guglielmino, L. M., & Long H. B. (1987). Self-directed learning readiness and performance in the workplace. Highier Education, 16,303-307.
6.
Long, H.
(1987). Item analysis of Guglielmino's self-directed learning readiness scale. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 6,331-336.
7.
Long, H. B.
(1989). Some additional criticisms of Field's investigation. Adult Education Quarterly, 39,240-243.
8.
McCune, S. K.
(1989). A statistical critique of Field's investigation. Adult Education Quarterly39,243-245.
9.
West, R F.
, & Bentley, E. L. (1989, February). Structural analysis of the self-directed learning readiness scale: A confirmatory factor analysis using Lisrel modeling. Paper presented at the North American Symposium on Adult Self-directed Learning, Oklahoma Research Centre for Continuing Professional and Higher Education, Norman, OK