Although emancipatory education and a critical theory of education are only rarely addressed in adult education, they provide rich opportunities for discussing primary issues of adult education. The purpose of this analysis is to contribute to the debate on the issue of emancipatory education, especially as begun by Jack Mezirow with his critical concept of adult education. Although Mezirow borrows important distinctions from Juergen Habermas' critical theory, his use of these distinctions neglects the radical impetus behind Habermas' writings. In addition, both Mezirow's and Habermas' conceptual frameworks emerge as being too rationalist for a broader, more encompassing concept of emancipatory education.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Blenky, M.
, Clinchy, B., Goldberger, N., Tarule, J. (1986). Women's ways of knowing.New York: Basic Books.
2.
Collard, S.
, & Law, M. (1989). The limits of perspective transformation: A critique of Meziow's theory. Adult Education Quarterly, 39,99-107.
3.
Culley, M.
, & Portuges, C. (Eds.). (1985). Gendered subjects.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
4.
Davis, B. H.
(Ed.). (1985). Feminist Education (Journal of Thought, Number 20). Norman, OKUniversity of Oklahoma.
5.
Eisenstein, H.
(1983). Contemporary feminist thought.Boston: CK Hall.
6.
Gilligan, C.
(1982). In a different voice.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
7.
Habermas, J.
(1969). Technik und Wissenschaft als "Ideologie' [Technology and science as "ideology"]. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
8.
Habermas, J.
(1970a). On systematically distorted communication. Inquiry, 13,205-218.
9.
Habermas, J.
(1970b). Towards a theory of communicative competence. Inquiry, 13,360-375.
10.
Habermas, J.
(1970c). Toward a rational society.Boston: Beacon Press.
11.
Habermas, J.
(1973). Wahrheitstheorien [Theories of truth]. In H. Fahrenbach (Ed.), Wirklichkeit und Reflexion.Pfullingen: Verlag Gunther Neske.
12.
Habermas, J.
(1974). Rationalism divided in two: A reply to Albert. In A. Giddens (Ed.), Positvism and sociology.London: Heinemann.
13.
Habermas, J.
(1975). Legitimation crisis.Boston: Beacon Press.
14.
Habermas, J.
(1979). Communication and the evolution of society.Boston: Beacon Press.
15.
Habermas, J.
(1984). The theory of communicative action: Volume one.Boston: Beacon Press.
16.
Hart, M.
(1985). Thematization of power, the search for common interests, and self-reflection: Towards a comprehensive concept of emancipatory education. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 4,119-134.
17.
Hart, M.
(in press). Liberation through consciousness-raising. In J. Mezirow (Ed.), Fostering critical reflection in adulthood. A guide to transformative and emancipatory learning.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18.
Jaggar, A.
(1989). Love and knowledge: Emotion in feminist epistemology. In A. Jaggar & S. Bordo, (Eds.), Gender/body/knowledge.New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
19.
McCarthy, T.
(1981). The critical theory of Juergen Habamas.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20.
Mezirow, J.
(1985). A critical theory of self-directed learning. In S. Brookfield (Ed.), self-directed learning: From theory to practice (New Directions for Continuing Education, Number 25, pp. 17-29). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21.
Mezirow, J.
(1989). Transformation theory and social action: A response to Collard and Law. Adult Education Quarterly, 39,169-175.
22.
Mezirow, J.
(Ed.). (in press). Fostering critical reflection in adulthood A guide to transformative and emancipatory learning.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23.
Schmidt-Waldherr, H.
(1985). Die "Entbindung" der Vernunft? [The "delivery" of reason?] In C. Kulke (Ed.), Ratonalitaet und sinnliche Vernunft.Berlin: Publica.
24.
Tronto. J. C.
(1989). Women and caring: What can feminists learn about morality from caring? In A. Jaggar & S. Bordo, (Eds.), Gender/body/knowledge.New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
25.
Young, I. M.
(1988). Impartiality and the civic public: Some implications of feminist critiques of moral and political theory. In S. Benhabib & D. Cornell (Eds.), Feminism as critique.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
