The Relationship Between Teaching Style and Adult Student Learning

Abstract

Adult education literature suggests that a teacher's actions affect student achievement. To test the appropriateness of the adult education theory base, this study examined the relationship between the teacher's practice of the principles in the literature as measured by the Principles of Adult Learning Scale and student academic achievement based on teacher assessment. It involved 29 teachers and 837 students in an adult basic education program. A significant relationship between teaching style and academic achievement was found. The findings were congruent with the literature base in the basic level and English as a second language classrooms but incongruent with the literature in the GED setting. This contrast was attributed to the differing cognitive and affective focus and the nature of the goals in each type of course. These findings suggest that other situationally specific studies are needed to further clarify the general adult education literature base.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beder, H. W. , & Darkenwald, G. G. (1982). Differences between teaching adults and pre-adults: Some propositions and findings. Adult Educationy, 32, 142-155.

Bennett, N. (1976). Teaching styles and pupil progress. London: Open Books Publishing Limited.

Bergevin, P. (1967). A philosophy for adult education. New York: The Seabury Press.

Conti, G. J. (1979). Principles of Adult Learning Scale: An instrument for measuring teacher behavior related to the collaborative teaching-learning mode (Doctoral dissertation, Northern Illinois University, 1978). Dissertation Abstracts International, 39, 7111A.

Conti, G. J. (1979). Principles of Adult Learning Scale. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Adult Education Research Conference. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 179 713).

Conti, G. J. (1982). The Principles of Adult Learning Scale. Adult Literacy and Basic Education, 6, 135-150.

Conti, G. J. (1983). Principles of Adult Learning Scale: Follow-up and factor analysis. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Adult Education Research Conference, 63-68.

Darkenwald, G. G. (1982). Factorial structure of differences in teaching behavior related to adult/pre-adult student age status. Adult Education, 32, 197-204.

Even, M. J. (1982). Adapting cognitive style theory in practice. Lifelong Learning, 5, 14-17;27.

10.

Fellenz, R. , Conti, G. , & Brekelbaum, T. (1981). Individual development and adult basic education: A student follow-up. College Station, Texas: Texas A&M University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 210 436).

11.

Fischer, B. , & Fischer, L. (1979). Styles in teaching and learning. Educational Leadership, 36, 245-251.

12.

Flanders, N. A. (1970). Analyzing teaching behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

13.

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: The Seabury Press.

14.

Houle, C. 0. (1972). The design of education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.

15.

Huck, S. W. , Cormier, W. H. , & Bounds, W. G., Jr. (1974). Reading statistics and research. New York: Harper & Row.

16.

Kerlinger, F. N. , & Pedhazur, E. J. (1968). Educational attitudes and perceptions of desirable traits of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 5, 543-560.

17.

Kidd, J. R. (1976). How adults learn. New York: Association Press.

18.

Knowles, M. S. (1970). The modern practice of adult education. New York: Association Press.

19.

Kuchinskas, G. (1979). Whose cognitive style makes the difference? Educational Leadership, 36, 269-271.

20.

Lindeman, E. C. (1961). The meaning of adult education. Montreal: Harvest House. (Originally published, 1926).

21.

McKeachie, W. J. (1981). Research needs in teaching effectiveness. Paper presented at Quality Teaching in a Technical Society Inquiry Conference, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.

22.

McKenzie, L. (1981). A contingency approach to the management of instruction. Lifelong Learning, 4, 10-11;21.

23.

Merriam, S. B. , & Jones, E. V. (1982). The use of "soft" data in adult learning and development research. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Adult Education Research Conference, 142-147.

24.

Mezirow, J. , Darkenwald, G. , & Knox, A. (1975). Last gamble on education. Washington, D.C.: Adult Education Association of the U.S.A.

25.

Rosenshine, B. , & Furst, N. F. (1973). The use of direct observation to study teaching. In R. Travers (Ed.), Second handbook of research on teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally.