Apparent reading deficiencies among entering workers, combined with increasing demands for highly skilled workers, have led business and industry to increase their training and education efforts. One aspect of this effort requires understanding the reading demands people in various occupations are likely to encounter. Using case studies and structured interviews, this study examines the reading practices of 99 adults across various occupational categories. Individual reading practices were characterized in terms of contents, materials, and uses for reading. Analyses of variance were conducted to examine the reading practices of those in different occupations and settings. It was found that reading volume for specific contents, materials, and uses were each significantly influenced by the occupational categories and settings in which reading occurred. The educational importance of accounting for this diversity in reading is discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Center for Public Resources.
(1982). Basic skills in the U.S. workforce.New York, N.Y.
2.
Chronicle of Higher Education. (May 4, 1983). Text from the report made by the National Commission on Excellence in Education.
3.
Crandall, J.
(December, 1981). Functional literacy of clerical workers: Strategies for minimizing literacy demands and maximizing available information. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, New York.
4.
Darkenwald, G. G.
(1983). Perspective of business and industry on cooperative programming with educational institutions. Adult Education Quarterly, 33,230-243.
5.
Diehl, W. (1980). Functional literacy as a variable construct: An examination of attitudes, behaviors, and strategies related to occupational literacy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University.
6.
Fisher, D.
(1978). Functional literacy and the schools.National Institute of Education: Washington, D.C.
7.
Goldstein, H.
(1980). Training and education by industry.Washington, DC.: National Institute of Work and Learning.
8.
Goody, J.
, & Watt, I. (1968). The consequences of literacy. In J. Goody (Ed.), Literacy in traditional societies.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Greaney, V.
, & Neuman, S. (1983). Exploring the functions of reading: A cross-cultural perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Reading Association, Anaheim.
10.
Guthrie, J. T.
, & Kirsch, I. S. (January 1984) The emergent perspective on literacy. Phi Delta Kappan,351-355.
11.
Guthrie, J. T.
, & Seifert, M. (1983) Contents and volumes of reading activities in occupational and educational groups. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal.
12.
Heath, S. B.
(1980). The functions and uses of literacy. Journal of Communication, 30(1), 123-133.
13.
Hennings, M. B.
(1982). American education: An economic issue.Human Resources Report, Chamber of Commerce, Washington, DC.
14.
Jacob, E.
(June 1982). Literacy on the job: Final report of the ethnographic component of the industrial literacy project.Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
15.
Kirsch, I. S. (1982). Competencies and uses of reading: An exploratory investigation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Delaware.
16.
Kirsch, I. S.
, & Guthrie, J. T. (1980). Construct validity of functional reading tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 17,81-93.
17.
Kirsch, I. S.
, & Guthrie, J. T. (August 1982) Case studies of reading in a highi technology corporation. Technical Report #2, International Reading Association.
18.
Kirsch, I. S.
, & Guthrie, J. T. (1984). Prose comprehension and text search as a function of reading volume. Reading Research Quarter-l, 19,331-342.
19.
Lerner, B.
(1981). The minimum competence testing movement: Social, scientific, and legal implications. American Psychologist. 36,1057-1066.
20.
Mikulecky, L.
(1982). Job literacy: The relationship between school preparation and work-place actuality. Reading Research Quarterly, 17 (3), 400-419.
21.
Miller, P.
(1982). Reading demands in a high-technology industry. Journal of Reading,26(2), 109-115.
22.
Oxenham, J.
(1980). Literacy: Writing, reading and social organization.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
23.
Pearson, P. D.
, & Johnson, D. D. (1978). Teaching reading comprehension.New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
24.
Scheuch, E. K.
(1972). The time-budget interview. In A. Szalai (Ed.), The use of time.The Hague: Mouton.
25.
Scribner, S.
, & Cole, M. (1978). Literacy without schooling: Testing for intellectual effects. Harvard Educational Review, 48,448-461.
26.
Scribner, S.
, & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
Sticht, T.
(1975). (Ed.) Reading for working: A functional literacy anthology.Alexandria, VA: Human Resources Research Organization.
28.
Sticht, T.
(1978). Literacy and vocational competence. (Occasional paper no. 39, National Center for Research in Vocational Education.) Columbus: Ohio State University.
29.
Sticht, T.
(January, 1982) Evaluation of the "reading potential" concept for marginally literate adults.Human Resources Research Organization, Final Report FR-ETSD-82-2.
30.
Szalai, A.
(1972). (Ed.) The use of time.The Hague: Mouton.
31.
Szwed, J.
(1981). The ethnography of literacy. In M. Whitman (Ed.) Writing; The nature, development, and teaching of written communication.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32.
Venezky, R. L.
(1983). The origins of the present-day chasm between adult literacy needs and school literacy instruction. Visible Language, 16,113-136.
33.
Winer, B. J.
(1971). Statistical principles in experimental design,2nd Ed.New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
