DunningJ. H. (2001). The key literature on IB activities: 1960–2000. In RugmanA. M.BrewerT. L. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international business (1st ed, pp. 36–68). Oxford University Press.
2.
EngwallL.PahlbergC.PerssonO. (2018). The development of IB as a scientific field. International Business Review, 27(5), 1080–1088.
3.
GeorgeG.Howard-GrenvilleJ.JoshiA.TihanyiL. (2016). Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research. Academy of Management Journal, 59(6), 1880–1895.
4.
GrodalS. (2018). Field expansion and contraction: How communities shape social and symbolic boundaries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 63(4), 783–818.
5.
JacobsJ. A.FrickelS. (2009). “Interdisciplinarity: A critical assessment.”Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 43–65.
6.
KaplanS.MildeJ.CowanR. S. (2017). Symbiont practices in boundary spanning: Bridging the cognitive and political divides in interdisciplinary research. Academy of Management Journal, 60(4), 1387–1414.
7.
KrammerS. M. S.DahlinP. (2024). An ivory tower of Babel? The impact of size and diversity of teams on research performance in business schools. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 23(2), 214–245.
8.
KrammerS. M.DahlinP.DohJ. P.PotočnikK. (2024). Happy diamond anniversary JMS! A decade analysis of theJournal of Management Studies, 61(4), 1654–1682.
LeaheyE.BeckmanC. M.StankoT. L. (2017). Prominent but less productive: The impact of interdisciplinarity on scientists’ research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(1), 105–139.
11.
WangX.WangH.HuangH. (2021). Evolutionary exploration and comparative analysis of the research topic networks in information disciplines. Scientometrics, 126(6), 4991–5017.