BechkyB. A.DavisG. F.2025 “Resisting the algorithmic management of science: Craft and community after generative AI.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 70(1): 1–22.
2.
BouldingK. E.1958 “Evidences for an administrative science: A review of the Administrative Science Quarterly, volumes 1 and 2.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 3: 1–22.
3.
Burton-JonesA.WangG.2023 “What makes a journal significant? From the tyranny of metrics to true impact.” MIS Quarterly, 47(2): i–xiv.
4.
ColquittJ. A.LongD. M.GentryR. J.2024 “Syllabus share: A new metric for gauging journal status.” Journal of Management Education, 48(1): 7–51.
5.
DaftR. L.1980 “The evolution of organization analysis in ASQ, 1959–1979.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(4): 623–636.
6.
DavisG. F.2014 “Editorial essay: Why do we still have journals?” Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(2): 193–201.
7.
GiddensA.1990The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford University Press.
8.
PalmerD.2006 “Taking stock of the criteria we use to evaluate one another’s work: ASQ 50 years out.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(4): 535–559.
9.
PrattM. G.KaplanS.WhittingtonR.2020 “Editorial essay: The tumult over transparency: Decoupling transparency from replication in establishing trustworthy qualitative research.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 65(1): 1–19.
10.
RallisonS. P.2015 “What are journals for?” The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 97(2): 89–91.
