Why do firms take positions on divisive social issues? In this article, I draw on theories of stigma by association to explain why firms’ mere proximity to controversial political actors may lead stakeholders to presume that firms silent on social issues are misaligned with the stakeholders’ sociopolitical preferences. Firms, in turn, countervail these presumptions of misalignment by eschewing silence and claiming sociopolitical positions. Substantiating this theory in the context of employee recruitment following the 2017 Unite the Right White supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, I show that Charlottesville’s employers combated presumptions that they shared demonstrators’ anti-diversity positions by making countervailing pro-diversity claims in their online job postings. In supplementary analysis, I show that the rally was associated with a newfound wage premium in job postings by Charlottesville’s employers but that this premium was lower when employers made pro-diversity claims. This study advances understanding of strategic sociopolitical positioning whereby firms make calculated appeals to stakeholders. It contrasts with related research showing that firms use social claims to combat negative evaluations resulting from their own actions or to differentiate from competitors. In doing so, it suggests opportunities for further research investigating, for example, additional motivations for firms’ sociopolitical positioning, how positioning might evolve in the context of growing political polarization, and how positioning might relate to workplace inequality and diversity.
AbadieA.DiamondA.HainmuellerJ.2010“Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: Estimating the effect of California’s Tobacco Control Program.”Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105(490): 493–505.
2.
AbrahamM.BurbanoV.2021“Congruence between leadership gender and organizational claims affects the gender composition of the applicant pool: Field experimental evidence.”Organization Science, 33(1): 393–413.
3.
AdutA.2005“A theory of scandal: Victorians, homosexuality, and the fall of Oscar Wilde.”American Journal of Sociology, 111(1): 213–248.
4.
ArgentiP. A.2004“Collaborating with activists: How Starbucks works with NGOs.”California Management Review, 47(1): 91–116.
BansalP.ClellandI.2004“Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment.”Academy of Management Journal, 47(1): 93–103.
7.
Barber IVB.DiestreL.2019“Pushing for speed or scope? Pharmaceutical lobbying and Food and Drug Administration drug review.”Strategic Management Journal, 40(8): 1194–1218.
8.
BaronD. P.DiermeierD.2007“Strategic activism and nonmarket strategy.”Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 16(3): 599–634.
9.
BaumeisterR. F.BratslavskyE.FinkenauerC.VohsK. D.2001“Bad is stronger than good.”Review of General Psychology, 5(4): 323–370.
10.
BermissY. S.McDonaldR.2018“Ideological misfit? Political affiliation and employee departure in the private-equity industry.”Academy of Management Journal, 61(6): 2182–2209.
11.
BhagwatY.WarrenN. L.BeckJ. T.WatsonG. F.2020“Corporate sociopolitical activism and firm value.”Journal of Marketing, 84(5): 1–21.
12.
BodeC.SinghJ.RoganM.2015“Corporate social initiatives and employee retention.”Organization Science, 26(6): 1702–1720.
13.
BoltonP.LiT.RavinaE.RosenthalH.2020“Investor ideology.”Journal of Financial Economics, 137(2): 320–352.
14.
BriscoeF.GuptaA.AnnerM. S.2015“Social activism and practice diffusion: How activist tactics affect non-targeted organizations.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 60(2): 300–332.
15.
BurbanoV. C.2021“The demotivating effects of communicating a social-political stance: Field experimental evidence from an online labor market platform.”Management Science, 67(2): 1004–1025.
16.
CarlosW. C.LewisB. W.2018“Strategic silence: Withholding certification status as a hypocrisy avoidance tactic.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 63(1): 130–169.
17.
CarnahanS.KryscynskiD.OlsonD.2017“When does corporate social responsibility reduce employee turnover? Evidence from attorneys before and after 9/11.”Academy of Management Journal, 60(5): 1932–1962.
CarpenterJ.GongE.2015“Motivating agents: How much does the mission matter?”Journal of Labor Economics, 34(1): 211–236.
20.
ChatterjiA. K.ToffelM. W.2019“Assessing the impact of CEO activism.”Organization & Environment, 32(2): 159–185.
21.
CobbJ. A.2016“How firms shape income inequality: Stakeholder power, executive decision making, and the structuring of employment relationships.”Academy of Management Review, 41(2): 324–348.
22.
ConoverP. J.FeldmanS.1982“Projection and the perception of candidates’ issue positions.”The Western Political Quarterly, 35(2): 228–244.
23.
DeversC. E.DewettT.MishinaY.BelsitoC. A.2009“A general theory of organizational stigma.”Organization Science, 20(1): 154–171.
24.
DewanT.ShepsleK. A.2011“Political economy models of elections.”Annual Review of Political Science, 14(1): 311–330.
25.
DobbinF.2009Inventing Equal Opportunity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
26.
DobbinF.KalevA.2021“The civil rights revolution at work: What went wrong.”Annual Review of Sociology, 47(1): 281–303.
27.
DoverT. L.MajorB.KaiserC. R.2016“Members of high-status groups are threatened by pro-diversity organizational messages.”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 62: 58–67.
28.
DurandR.VergneJ.-P.2015“Asset divestment as a response to media attacks in stigmatized industries.”Strategic Management Journal, 36(8): 1205–1223.
ElsbachK. D.1994“Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry: The construction and effectiveness of verbal accounts.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(1): 57–88.
32.
FavaronS. D.Di StefanoG.DurandR.2022“Michelin is coming to town: Organizational responses to status shocks.”Management Science, 68(9): 6925–6949.
FlammerC.KacperczykA.2019“Corporate social responsibility as a defense against knowledge spillovers: Evidence from the inevitable disclosure doctrine.”Strategic Management Journal, 40(8): 1243–1267.
35.
FloryJ. A.LeibbrandtA.RottC.StoddardO.2021“Increasing workplace diversity: Evidence from a recruiting experiment at a Fortune 500 company.”Journal of Human Resources, 57(1): 73–92.
36.
FremethA. R.HolburnG. L. F.PiazzaA.2022“Activist protest spillovers into the regulatory domain: Theory and evidence from the U.S. nuclear power generation industry.”Organization Science, 33(3): 1163–1187.
HadaniM.SchulerD.2013“In search of El Dorado: The elusive financial returns on corporate political investments.”Strategic Management Journal, 34(2): 165–181.
41.
HambrickD. C.WowakA. J.2021“CEO sociopolitical activism: A stakeholder alignment model.”Academy of Management Review, 46(1): 33–59.
42.
HeblM. R.MannixL. M.2003“The weight of obesity in evaluating others: A mere proximity effect.”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(1): 28–38.
43.
Hertel-FernandezA.2018Politics at Work: How Companies Turn Their Workers into Lobbyists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44.
HolburnG. L. F.Vanden BerghR. G.2014“Integrated market and nonmarket strategies: Political campaign contributions around merger and acquisition events in the energy sector.”Strategic Management Journal, 35(3): 450–460.
45.
HouY.PoliquinC.2022“The effects of CEO activism: Partisan consumer behavior and its duration.”Strategic Management Journal, 44(3): 672–703.
46.
HurstR.2021“Workplace backlash? Workforce diversity, status threat, and the contractionary effects of pro-diversity claims.”SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3789682.
47.
HurstR.2023“Strategically ambiguous identities: Evidence from evangelical clergy in Brazilian elections.”The Journal of Politics, 85(4): 1336–1351. https://doi.org/10.1086/723969.
48.
HurstR.LeeS. R.FrakeJ.2022“The effect of hierarchy on applicant pool gender diversity: Evidence from experiments.”SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4030741.
JanneyJ. J.GoveS.2011“Reputation and corporate social responsibility aberrations, trends, and hypocrisy: Reactions to firm choices in the stock option backdating scandal.”Journal of Management Studies, 48(7): 1562–1585.
51.
JensenM.2006“Should we stay or should we go? Accountability, status anxiety, and client defections.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(1): 97–128.
52.
JonssonS.GreveH. R.Fujiwara-GreveT.2009“Undeserved loss: The spread of legitimacy loss to innocent organizations in response to reported corporate deviance.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(2): 195–228.
53.
KahnemanD.KnetschJ. L.ThalerR. H.1991“Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias.”The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1): 193–206.
54.
KalevA.DobbinF.KellyE.2006“Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies.”American Sociological Review, 71(4): 589–617.
55.
KangS. K.DeCellesK. A.TilcsikA.JunS.2016“Whitened résumés: Race and self-presentation in the labor market.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 61(3): 469–502.
56.
KrosnickJ. A.1990“Government policy and citizen passion: A study of issue publics in contemporary America.”Political Behavior, 12(1): 59–92.
LiZ.DisalvoR. W.2023“Can stakeholders mobilize businesses for the protection of democracy? Evidence from the U.S. Capitol insurrection.”American Political Science Review, 117(3): 1130–1136.
60.
Lightcast2022“Representativeness analysis of Lightcast job posting data - U.S.” Unpublished report shared by company.
61.
LuoJ.KaulA.SeoH.2018“Winning us with trifles: Adverse selection in the use of philanthropy as insurance.”Strategic Management Journal, 39(10): 2591–2617.
MarkusG. B.ConverseP. E.1979“A dynamic simultaneous equation model of electoral choice.”The American Political Science Review, 73(4): 1055–1070.
64.
MarquisC.2003“The pressure of the past: Network imprinting in intercorporate communities.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(4): 655–689.
65.
McAuliffeT.2019Beyond Charlottesville: Taking a Stand Against White Nationalism. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
66.
McConnellC.MargalitY.MalhotraN.LevenduskyM.2018“The economic consequences of partisanship in a polarized era.”American Journal of Political Science, 62(1): 5–18.
67.
McDonnellM.-H.KingB.2013“Keeping up appearances: Reputational threat and impression management after social movement boycotts.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(3): 387–419.
68.
McDonnellM.-H.OdziemkowskaK.PontikesE.2021“Bad company: Shifts in social activists’ tactics and resources after industry crises.”Organization Science, 32(4): 1033–1055.
69.
McVeighR.EstepK.2019The Politics of Losing: Trump, the Klan, and the Mainstreaming of Resentment. New York: Columbia University Press.
70.
MelloniG.PatacconiA.VikanderN.2023“Cashing in on the culture wars? CEO activism, wokewashing, and firm value.”Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3542.
71.
MohliverA.CrillyD.KaulA.2023“Corporate social counterpositioning: How attributes of social issues influence competitive response.”Strategic Management Journal, 44(5): 1199–1217.
72.
MohliverA.HawnO.2019“Rewarding the extremes: Market reaction to U.S. corporations’ LGBTQ positions.”SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3477837.
73.
NaumovskaI.LavieD.2021“When an industry peer is accused of financial misconduct: Stigma versus competition effects on non-accused firms.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 66(4): 1130–1172.
74.
NorrisP.InglehartR.2019Cultural Backlash and the Rise of Populism: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
75.
PanagopoulosC.GreenD. P.KrasnoJ.Schwam-BairdM.EndresK.2020“Partisan consumerism: Experimental tests of consumer reactions to corporate political activity.”The Journal of Politics, 82(3): 996–1007.
PennyH.HaddockG.2007“Anti-fat prejudice among children: The ‘mere proximity’ effect in 5–10 year olds.”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(4): 678–683.
PiazzaA.JourdanJ.2018“When the dust settles: The consequences of scandals for organizational competition.”Academy of Management Journal, 61(1): 165–190.
81.
PiazzaA.PerrettiF.2015“Categorical stigma and firm disengagement: Nuclear power generation in the United States, 1970–2000.”Organization Science, 26(3): 724–742.
82.
PlautV. C.GarnettF. G.BuffardiL. E.Sanchez-BurksJ.2011“‘What about me?’ Perceptions of exclusion and Whites’ reactions to multiculturalism.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2): 337–353.
83.
PontikesE.NegroG.RaoH.2010“Stained red: A study of stigma by association to blacklisted artists during the ‘Red Scare’ in Hollywood, 1945 to 1960.”American Sociological Review, 75(3): 456–478.
84.
PryorJ. B.ReederG. D.MonroeA. E.2012“The infection of bad company: Stigma by association.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(2): 224–241.
RosenhanD.MessickS.1966“Affect and expectation.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3(1): 38–44.
87.
RossL.GreeneD.HouseP.1977“The ‘false consensus effect’: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes.”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(3): 279–301.
88.
RothJ.2021“Pre-test with caution: Event-study estimates after testing for parallel trends.”American Economic Review: Insights, 4(3): 305–322.
89.
RozinP.RoyzmanE. B.2001“Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion.”Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(4): 296–320.
90.
ShortJ. L.ToffelM. W.2010“Making self-regulation more than merely symbolic: The critical role of the legal environment.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(3): 361–396.
91.
SignerM.2020Cry Havoc: Charlottesville and American Democracy Under Siege. New York: Public Affairs.
92.
ThompsonC.PressH. H.2022“Some school systems pause diversity programs amid pushback.”Los Angeles Times, Feb. 20.
93.
TolbertP. S.CastillaE. J.2017“Editorial essay: Introduction to a special issue on inequality in the workplace (“What works?”).”ILR Review, 70(1): 3–15.
94.
TomzM.Van HouwelingR.2009“The electoral implications of candidate ambiguity.”American Political Science Review, 103(1): 83–98.
VogelD.2005The Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
97.
WagnerT.LutzR. J.WeitzB. A.2009“Corporate hypocrisy: Overcoming the threat of inconsistent corporate social responsibility perceptions.”Journal of Marketing, 73(6): 77–91.
98.
WernerT.2012Public Forces and Private Politics in American Big Business. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
99.
WernerT.2017“Investor reaction to covert corporate political activity.”Strategic Management Journal, 38(12): 2424–2443.
100.
WowakA. J.BusenbarkJ. R.HambrickD. C.2022“How do employees react when their CEO speaks out? Intra- and extra-firm implications of CEO sociopolitical activism.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 67(2): 553–593.
101.
YueL. Q.RaoH.IngramP.2013“Information spillovers from protests against corporations: A tale of Walmart and Target.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(4): 669–701.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
