Social activists sometimes engage in a form of workplace activism that involves using their employer organization as an unofficial platform to communicate social issue messages to external stakeholders. This type of activism follows a different logic from that of more-familiar citizen activism, in which citizens directly target society and its institutions, and that of organizational-change activism, in which employees aim to influence their employer organization. This article develops and tests theory to understand this phenomenon of organization-as-platform activism, using the National Football League “Take a Knee” employee athlete protests as an empirical context. Drawing on past research on social movements and employee activism, we offer a theoretical comparison of these three forms of activism—citizen, organizational-change, and organization-as-platform—to conceptually distinguish them and to theorize factors that uniquely predict the occurrence of platform activism. We find evidence of predictors associated with the attributes of the organizational platform and those of the intended stakeholder audience. Organization-as-platform activism is associated with the accessibility and openness of the organizational platform for messaging use, the visibility of the organizational platform for message transmission, and the receptivity of the targeted stakeholder audience. As employees increasingly bring their non-work identities and beliefs into the workplace, our findings invite new research on the outcomes of platform activism for organizations, the implications of such activism for organizational stakeholder strategy, and the relation between platform activism and employee prosocial voice.
Ashburn-NardoL.ThomasK.RobinsonA. J.2017 “Broadening the conversation: Why black lives matter.” Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 36: 698–706.
3.
BakerC.2017 “The ‘gay Olympics’? The Eurovision song contest and the politics of LGBT/European belonging.” European Journal of International Relations, 23(1): 97–121.
4.
BarnettM. L.2018 “Influence stakeholders, influence the world.” In BriscoeF. S.KingB.LeitzingerJ. (eds.), Social Movements, Stakeholders and Non-Market Strategy: Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 56: 247–258. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited.
5.
BartleyT.ChildC.2014 “Shaming the corporation: The social production of targets and the anti-sweatshop movement.” American Sociological Review, 79(4): 653–679.
6.
BentonR. A.CobbJ. A.WernerT.2022 “Firm partisan positioning, polarization, and risk communication: Examining voluntary disclosures on Covid-19.” Strategic Management Journal, 43(4): 697–723.
7.
BloomJ. M.2014 “Political opportunity structure, contentious social movements, and state-based organizations: The fight against solidarity inside the Polish United Workers Party.” Social Science History, 38(3–4): 359–388.
8.
BoykoffJ.2014Activism and the Olympics: Dissent at the Games in Vancouver and London. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
9.
BriscoeF.ChinM. K.HambrickD. C.2014 “CEO ideology as an element of the corporate opportunity structure for social activists.” Academy of Management Journal, 57: 1786–1809.
10.
BriscoeF.GuptaA.2016 “Social activism in and around organizations.” Academy of Management Annals, 10: 671–727.
11.
BurbanoV. 2021 “The demotivating effects of communicating a social-political stance: Field experimental evidence from an online labor market platform.” Management Science, 67(2): 1004–1025.
12.
BurchellK.2015 “Infiltrating the space, hijacking the platform: Pussy Riot, Sochi protests, and media events.” Journal of Audience and Reception Studies, 12(1): 659–676.
13.
CammaertsB.2012 “Protest logics and the mediation opportunity structure.” European Journal of Communication, 27: 117–134.
14.
ChatterjiA.ToffelM. W.2019 “Assessing the impact of CEO activism.” Organization and Environment, 32: 159–185.
15.
ChinM. K.HambrickD. C.TreviñoL. K.2013 “Political ideologies of CEOs: The influence of executives’ values on corporate social responsibility.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 58: 197–232.
16.
ChinM. K.SemadeniM.2017 “CEO political ideologies and pay egalitarianism within top management teams.” Strategic Management Journal, 38: 1608–1625.
17.
CowherdD. M.LevineD. I.1992 “Product quality and pay equity between lower-level employees and top management: An investigation of distributive justice theory.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 37: 302–320.
18.
CreedW. E. D.ScullyM. A.AustinJ. R.2002 “Clothes make the person? The tailoring of legitimating accounts and the social construction of identity.” Organization Science, 13: 475–496.
19.
DeCellesK. A.SonensheinS.KingB. G.2020 “Examining anger’s immobilizing effect on institutional insiders’ action intentions in social movements.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 65: 847–886.
20.
DeJordyR.ScullyM.VentrescaM. J.CreedW. E. D.2020 “Inhabited ecosystems: Propelling transformative social change between and through organizations.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 65: 931–971.
21.
EarlJ.KimportK.2011Digitally Enabled Social Change: Activism in the Internet Age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22.
FosterM. D.MathesonK.1999 “Perceiving and responding to the personal/group discrimination discrepancy.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25: 1319–1329.
23.
FredricksonJ. W.Davis-BlakeA.SandersW. M. G.2010 “Sharing the wealth: Social comparisons and pay dispersion in the CEO’s top team.” Strategic Management Journal, 31(10): 1031–1053.
24.
FroomanJ.1999 “Stakeholder influence strategies.” Academy of Management Review, 24: 191–205.
25.
FullwoodC.NichollsW.MakichiR.2015 “We’ve got something for everyone: How individual differences predict different blogging motivations.” New Media & Society, 17: 1583–1600.
26.
GamsonW. A.1975The Strategy of Social Protest. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
GrolP. C.SchochC.1998 “IKEA: Managing cultural diversity.” In OddouG.MendenhallM. (eds.), Cases in International Organizational Behavior: 88–112. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
29.
GuptaA.BriscoeF. S.2020 “Organizational political ideology and corporate openness to social activism.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 65: 524–563.
30.
HaastrupH. K.2021 “When Golden Globes and stars align: The awards show as a platform for cultural criticism.” In KristensenN. N.FromU.HaastrupH. K. (eds.), Rethinking Cultural Criticism: 91–112. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
31.
HambrickD. C.WowakA.2021 “CEO sociopolitical activism: A stakeholder alignment model.” Academy of Management Review, 46: 33–59.
32.
HuangC. Y.ShenY. Z.LinH. X.ChangS. S.2007 “Bloggers’ motivations and behaviours: A model.” Journal of Advertising Research, 47: 472–484.
33.
IordanovaD.TorchinL. (eds.) 2012Film Festivals and Activism. St. Andrews, Scotland: St Andrews Film Studies.
34.
JanicijevicN.2013 “The mutual impact of organizational culture and structure.” Economic Annals, 58: 35–60.
35.
JostJ. T.GlaserJ.KruglanskiA. W.SullowayF. J.2003 “Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.” Psychological Bulletin, 129: 339–375.
36.
KelloggK. C.2009 “Operating room: Relational spaces and microinstitutional change in surgery.” American Journal of Sociology, 115: 657–711.
37.
KelloggK. C.2011Challenging Operations: Medical Reform and Resistance in Surgery. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
38.
KingB.2008a “A social movement perspective of stakeholder collective action and influence.” Business & Society, 47: 21–49.
39.
KingB. G.2008b “A political mediation model of corporate response to social movement activism.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 53: 395–421.
40.
KingB. G.PearceN. A.2010 “The contentiousness of markets: Politics, social movements, and institutional change in markets.” Annual Review of Sociology, 36: 249–267.
41.
KingG.ZengL.2001 “Logistic regression in rare events data.” Political Analysis, 9: 137–163.
42.
KlandermansB.1984 “Mobilization and participation: Social-psychological expansions of resource mobilization theory.” American Sociological Review, 49: 583–600.
43.
KlandermansB.1997The Social Psychology of Protest. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
44.
KlandermansB.2004 “The demand and supply of participation: Social-psychological correlates of participation in social movements.” In SnowD. A.SouleS. A.KriesiH. (eds.), Blackwell Companion to Social Movements: 360–379. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
45.
KriesiH.KoopmansR.DuyvendakJ. W.GiugniM.1995The Politics of New Social Movements in Western Europe. A Comparative Analysis. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
46.
LawlerE. E.1990 “The new plant revolution revisited.” Organizational Dynamics, 19(2): 5–14.
47.
LeeM.-D. P.LounsburyM.2015 “Filtering institutional logics: Community logic variation and differential responses to the institutional complexity of toxic waste.” Organization Science, 26(3): 847–866.
48.
LeighA.MelwaniS.2019 “#BlackEmployeesMatter: Mega-threats, identity fusion, and enacting positive deviance in organizations.” Academy of Management Review, 43: 1–28.
49.
LeighA.MelwaniS.2022 “‘Am I next?’ The spillover effects of mega-threats on avoidant behaviors at work.” Academy of Management Journal, 65: 720–748.
50.
LiangJ.FarhC. I. C.FarhJ.-L.2012 “Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination.” Academy of Management Journal, 55: 71–92.
51.
MaibachE. W.LeiserowitzA.Roser-RenoufC.MertzC. K.2011 “Identifying like-minded audiences for global warming public engagement campaigns: An audience segmentation analysis and tool development.” PLoS ONE, 6: e17571.
52.
MaynesT. D.PodsakoffP. M.2014 “Speaking more broadly: An examination of the nature, antecedents, and consequences of an expanded set of employee voice behaviors.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(1): 87–112.
53.
McAdamD.1982Political Process Theory and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
54.
McAdamD.1986 “Recruitment to high-risk activism: The case of freedom summer.” American Journal of Sociology, 92: 64–90.
55.
McAdamD.1996 “Political opportunities: Conceptual origins, current problems, future directions.” In McAdamD.McCarthyJ.ZaldM. (eds.), Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: 23–40. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
56.
McAdamD.TarrowS.TillyC.2001Dynamics of Contention. New York: Cambridge University Press.
57.
McCarthyJ.ZaldM.1973The Trend of Social Movements in America: Professionalization and Resource Mobilization. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
58.
McCluneyC. L.BryantC. M.KingD. D.AliA. A.2017 “Calling in Black: A dynamic model of racially traumatic events, resourcing, and safety.” Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 36: 767–786.
MeierH. E.MutzM.GlatheJ.JetzkeM.HölzenM.2021 “Politicization of a contested mega event: The 2018 FIFA World Cup on Twitter.” Communication & Sport, 9(5): 785–810.
61.
MeyerD. S.2004 “Protest and political opportunities.” Annual Review of Sociology, 30: 125–145.
62.
MeyerD. S.MinkoffD. C.2004 “Conceptualizing political opportunity.” Social Forces, 82(4): 1457–1492.
63.
MeyersonD. E.ScullyM. A.1995 “Tempered radicalism and the politics of ambivalence and change.” Organization Science, 6: 585–600.
MooreK.2008Disrupting Science: Social Movements, American Scientists, and the Politics of the Military, 1945–1975. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
66.
MorandD. A.1996 “Dominance, deference, and egalitarianism in organizational interaction: A sociolinguistic analysis of power and politeness.” Organization Science, 7: 544–556.
67.
MorrisonE. W.2011 “Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research.” Academy of Management Annals, 5: 373–412.
68.
MorrisonE. W.2023 “Employee voice and silence: Taking stock a decade later.” Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-054654.
69.
NapoliP. M.2008 “Revisiting ‘mass communication’ and the ‘work’ of the audience in the new media environment.” McGannon Center Working Paper Series, 24.
70.
NegroG.OlzakA.2019 “Which side are you on? The divergent effects of protest participation on organizations affiliated with identity groups.” Organization Science, 30: 1189–1206.
71.
NembhardI. M.EdmondsonA. C.2006 “Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams.” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(7): 941–966.
72.
OdziemkowskaK.2022 “Frenemies: Overcoming audiences’ ideological opposition to firm–activist collaborations.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 67: 469–514.
73.
OpieT.RobertsL. M.2017 “Do black lives really matter in the workplace? Restorative justice as a means to reclaim humanity.” Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 36: 707–719.
74.
PalazzoG.BasuK.2007 “The ethical backlash of corporate branding.” Journal of Business Ethics, 73(4): 333–346.
75.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T.1986 “The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19: 123–205.
76.
PfefferJ.1994Competitive Advantage Through People. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
77.
PoellT.van DijckV.2015 “Social media and activist communication.” In AttonC. (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Alternative and Community Media: 527–537. London: Routledge.
78.
PostmesT.BrunstingS.2002 “Collective action in the age of the Internet: Mass communication and online mobilization.” Social Science Computer Review, 20: 290–301.
79.
RaeburnN. C.2004Changing Corporate America from Inside Out: Lesbian and Gay Workplace Rights. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
80.
RafailP.WalkerE.McCarthyJ. D.2017 “Protests on the front page: Media salience, institutional dynamics, and coverage of collective action in The New York Times, 1960–1995.” Communication Research, 46: 33–61.
81.
RehbeinK.WaddockS.GravesS. B.2004 “Understanding shareholder activism: Which corporations are targeted?” Business and Society, 43(3): 239–267.
82.
RojasF.2011 “Institutions and disciplinary beliefs about Africana studies.” Western Journal of Black Studies, 35: 92–105.
83.
Schmitt-BeckR.FarrellD. M.2002 “Studying political campaigns and their effects.” In FarrellD. M.Schmitt-BeckR. (eds.), Do Political Campaigns Matter? Campaign Effects in Elections and Referendums: 1–21. London: Routledge Press.
84.
SchussmanA.SouleS. A.2005 “Process and protest: Accounting for individual protest participation.” Social Forces, 84: 1083–1108.
85.
ScullyM.SegalM.2002 “Passion with an umbrella: Grassroots activists in the workplace.” In LounsburyM.VentrescaM. (eds.), Social Structure and Organizations Revisited: Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 19: 125–168. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
86.
SiegelJ. I.LichtA. N.SchwartzS. H.2013 “Egalitarianism, cultural distance, and foreign direct investment: A new approach.” Organization Science, 24: 1174–1194.
87.
SouleS. A.2009Contention and Corporate Social Responsibility. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
88.
TarrowS.1994Power in Movement. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
89.
TetlockP. E.2000 “Cognitive biases and organizational correctives: Do both disease and cure depend on the politics of the beholder?” Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 293–326.
90.
TilcsikA.MarquisC.2013 “Punctuated generosity: How mega-events and natural disasters affect corporate philanthropy in U.S. communities.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 58: 111–148.
91.
TillyC.1978From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
92.
van StekelenburgJ.KlandermansB.2007 “Individuals in movements: A social psychology of contention.” In KlandermansB.RoggebandC. (eds.), Handbook of Social Movements Across Disciplines (Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research): 103–139. New York: Springer International.
93.
van StekelenburgJ.KlandermansB.2013 “The social psychology of protest.” Current Sociology Review, 61: 886–905.
94.
van StekelenburgJ.KlandermansB.WalgraveS.2019 “Individual participation in street demonstrations.” In SnowD. A.SouleS. A.KriesiH.McCammonH. J. (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Social Movements: 369–391. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
95.
Van ZomerenM.PostmesT.SpearsR.2008 “Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives.” Psychological Bulletin, 134: 504–535.
96.
Van ZomerenM.SpearsR.FischerA. H.LeachC. W.2004 “Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87: 649–664.
97.
VasiI.KingB.2012 “Social movements, risk perceptions, and economic outcomes: The effect of primary and secondary stakeholder activism on firms’ perceived environmental risk and financial performance.” American Sociological Review, 77: 573–596.
98.
VasiI. B.WalkerE. T.JohnsonJ. S.TanH. F.2015 “‘No fracking way!’ Documentary film, discursive opportunity, and local opposition against hydraulic fracturing in the United States, 2010 to 2013.” American Sociological Review, 80: 934–959.
99.
VerbaS.SchlozmanK. L.BradyH. E.1995Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
100.
WebsterJ. G.PhalenP. F.2013The Mass Audience: Rediscovering the Dominant Model. New York: Routledge.
101.
WefferS. E.Dominguez-MartinezR.JenkinsR.2018 “Taking a knee.” Contexts, 17: 66–68.
102.
WiltfangG.McAdamD.1991 “Distinguishing cost and risk in sanctuary activism.” Social Forces, 69: 987–1010.
ZatzickC. D.ElviraM. M.CohenL. E.2003 “When is more better? The effects of racial composition on voluntary turnover.” Organization Science, 14(5): 483–496.
