Business leaders have traditionally avoided wading into society’s debates. Yet more and more CEOs are taking visible public stands on hotly contested issues, engaging in what has come to be called CEO sociopolitical activism. Despite its growing prevalence and potentially major implications, this class of executive behaviors remains largely unexplored by organizational scholars. Our study tests and elaborates on stakeholder alignment theory to investigate the influence of CEO activism on employees’ attitudes and behaviors, particularly its effects on employees’ organizational commitment and support for the ideology underpinning the CEO’s public stance. Our theoretical predictions hinge on the degree of alignment between the CEO’s stance and the prevailing ideological tilt of the employee population, as well as the degree to which employees view the CEO as a credible leader. We test our ideas in the context of a highly publicized letter signed by nearly 100 public company CEOs in opposition to North Carolina’s controversial 2016 “bathroom bill.” Relying on multiple data sources to examine differences between firms whose CEOs signed the letter and firms whose CEOs declined the invitation to sign, we find general support for our theory, indicating that CEO activism has important intra- and extra-firm implications.
AshforthB. E.MaelF.1989 “Social identity theory and the organization.” Academy of Management Review, 14: 20–39.
2.
BarretoN. B.HoggM. A.2017 “Evaluation of and support for group prototypical leaders: A meta-analysis of twenty years of empirical research.” Social Influence, 12: 41–55.
3.
BassB. M.1990Bass & Stogdill’s Handbook of Leadership. New York: Free Press.
4.
BermissY. S.McDonaldR.2018 “Ideological misfit? Political affiliation and employee departure in the private-equity industry.” Academy of Management Journal, 61: 2182–2209.
5.
BeyerJ. M.1981 “Ideologies, values, and decision making in organizations.” In NystromP. C.StarbuckW. H. (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Design: 162–202. New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
BishopB.2008The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like-Minded America Is Tearing Us Apart. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin Harcourt.
7.
BoivieS.BednarM. K.AguileraR. V.AndrusJ. L.2016 “Are boards designed to fail? The implausibility of effective board monitoring.” Academy of Management Annals, 10: 319–407.
8.
BoivieS.GraffinS. D.GentryR. J.2016 “Understanding the direction, magnitude, and joint effects of reputation when multiple actors’ reputations collide.” Academy of Management Journal, 59: 188–206.
9.
BonicaA.2019 “Are donation-based measures of ideology valid predictors of individual-level policy preferences?”Journal of Politics, 81: 327–333.
10.
BowenH. P.2012 “Testing moderating hypotheses in limited dependent variable and other nonlinear models: Secondary versus total interactions.” Journal of Management, 38: 860–889.
BrewerP. R.2003 “Values, political knowledge, and public opinion about gay rights: A framing-based account.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 67: 173–201.
13.
BriscoeF.ChinM. K.HambrickD. C.2014 “CEO ideology as an element of the corporate opportunity structure for social activists.” Academy of Management Journal, 57: 1786–1809.
14.
BundyJ.VogelR. M.ZacharyM. A.2018 “Organization–stakeholder fit: A dynamic theory of cooperation, compromise, and conflict between an organization and its stakeholders.” Strategic Management Journal, 39: 476–501.
15.
BusenbarkJ. R.LangeD.CertoS. T.2017 “Foreshadowing as impression management: Illuminating the path for security analysts.” Strategic Management Journal, 38: 2486–2507.
16.
CarpenterM. A.WestphalJ. D.2001 “The strategic context of external network ties: Examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making.” Academy of Management Journal, 44: 639–660.
17.
CertoS. T.BusenbarkJ. R.WooH.-s.SemadeniM.2016 “Sample selection bias and Heckman models in strategic management research.” Strategic Management Journal, 37: 2639–2657.
18.
ChatterjiA. K.ToffelM. W.2018 “The new CEO activists.” Harvard Business Review, 96: 78–89.
19.
ChatterjiA. K.ToffelM. W.2019 “Assessing the impact of CEO activism.” Organization & Environment, 32: 159–185.
20.
ChinM. K.HambrickD. C.TreviñoL. K.2013 “Political ideologies of CEOs: The influence of executives’ values on corporate social responsibility.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 58: 197–232.
21.
ChinM. K.SemadeniM.2017 “CEO political ideologies and pay egalitarianism within top management teams.” Strategic Management Journal, 38: 1608–1625.
22.
CialdiniR. B.TrostM. R.1998 “Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance.” In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology: 151–192. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
23.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S.2003Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24.
CongerJ. A.KanungoR. N.1987 “Toward a behavioral theory of charismatic leadership in organizational settings.” Academy of Management Review, 12: 637–647.
CorleyK. G.GioiaD. A.2004 “Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 49: 173–208.
27.
CorritoreM.GoldbergA.SrivastavaS. B.2020 “Duality in diversity: How intrapersonal and interpersonal cultural heterogeneity relate to firm performance.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 65: 359–394.
28.
DailyC. M.SchwenkC.1996 “Chief executive officers, top management teams, and boards of directors: Congruent or countervailing forces?” Journal of Management, 22: 185–208.
29.
DaltonD. R.DailyC. M.EllstrandA. E.JohnsonJ. L.1998 “Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance.” Strategic Management Journal, 19: 269–290.
30.
DieneschR. M.LidenR. C.1986 “Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development.” Academy of Management Review, 11: 618–634.
EriksonR. S.TedinK. L.2003American Public Opinion: Its Origins, Context, and Impact. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
35.
FissP. C.ZajacE. J.2006 “The symbolic management of strategic change: Sensegiving via framing and decoupling.” Academy of Management Journal, 49: 1173–1193.
36.
GioiaD. A.ChittipeddiK.1991 “Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation.” Strategic Management Journal, 12: 433–448.
37.
GioiaD. A.ThomasJ. B.1996 “Identity, image, and issue interpretation: Sensemaking during strategic change in academia.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 370–403.
38.
GioiaD. A.ThomasJ. B.ClarkS. M.ChittipeddiK.1994 “Symbolism and strategic change in academia: The dynamics of sensemaking and influence.” Organization Science, 5: 363–383.
GraffinS. D.PfarrerM. D.HillM. W.2012 “Untangling executive reputation and corporate reputation: Who made who?” In BarnettM. L.PollockT. G. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Reputation: 221–239. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41.
GreenD.PalmquistB.SchicklerE.2002Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
42.
GreenT. C.HuangR.WenQ.ZhouD.2019 “Crowdsourced employer reviews and stock returns.” Journal of Financial Economics, 134: 236–251.
43.
GuptaA.BriscoeF.2020 “Organizational political ideology and corporate openness to social activism.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 65: 524–563.
44.
GuptaA.BriscoeF.HambrickD. C.2017 “Red, blue, and purple firms: Organizational political ideology and corporate social responsibility.” Strategic Management Journal, 38: 1018–1040.
45.
GuptaA.BriscoeF.HambrickD. C.2018 “Evenhandedness in resource allocation: CEO ideology, organizational discretion, and firm performance.” Academy of Management Journal, 61: 1848–1868.
46.
GuptaA.MisangyiV. F.2018 “Follow the leader (or not): The influence of peer CEOs’ characteristics on interorganizational imitation.” Strategic Management Journal, 39: 1437–1472.
47.
GuptaA.WowakA. J.2017 “The elephant (or donkey) in the boardroom: How board political ideology affects CEO pay.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 62: 1–30.
48.
HambrickD. C.LovelaceJ. B.2018 “The role of executive symbolism in advancing new strategic themes in organizations: A social influence perspective.” Academy of Management Review, 43: 110–131.
49.
HambrickD. C.WowakA. J.2021 “CEO sociopolitical activism: A stakeholder alignment model.” Academy of Management Review, 46: 33–59.
HaslamS. A.OakesP. J.McGartyC.TurnerJ. C.OnoratoR. S.1995 “Contextual changes in the prototypicality of extreme and moderate outgroup members.” European Journal of Social Psychology, 25: 509–530.
52.
HaywardM. L. A.RindovaV. P.PollockT. G.2004 “Believing one’s own press: The antecedents and consequences of CEO celebrity.” Strategic Management Journal, 25: 637–653.
53.
HeckmanJ. J.1979 “Sample selection bias as a specification error.” Econometrica, 47: 153–161.
54.
HoggM. A.1993 “Group cohesiveness: A critical review and some new directions.” European Review of Social Psychology, 4: 85–111.
55.
HoggM. A.2001 “A social identity theory of leadership.” Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5: 184–200.
56.
HoggM. A.van KnippenbergD.RastD. E.2012 “The social identity theory of leadership: Theoretical origins, research findings, and conceptual developments.” European Review of Social Psychology, 23: 258–304.
57.
HollanderE. P.OffermannL. R.1990 “Power and leadership in organizations: Relationships in transition.” American Psychologist, 45: 179–189.
58.
HuangK.LiM.MarkovS.2020 “What do employees know? Evidence from a social media platform.” Accounting Review, 95: 199–226.
59.
HuddyL.2001 “From social to political identity: A critical examination of social identity theory.” Political Psychology, 22: 127–156.
HuyQ. N.2011 “How middle managers’ group-focus emotions and social identities influence strategy implementation.” Strategic Management Journal, 32: 1387–1410.
63.
IoannouI.SerafeimG.2015 “The impact of corporate social responsibility on investment recommendations: Analysts’ perceptions and shifting institutional logics.” Strategic Management Journal, 36: 1053–1081.
64.
JensenM. C.MecklingW. H.1976 “Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure.” Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305–360.
65.
JonesT. M.1995 “Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics.” Academy of Management Review, 20: 404–437.
66.
JostJ. T.FedericoC. M.NapierJ. L.2009 “Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities.” Annual Review of Psychology, 60: 307–337.
67.
KennedyP.2008A Guide to Econometrics, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
68.
KönigA.MammenJ.LugerJ.FehnA.EndersA.2018 “Silver bullet or ricochet? CEOs’ use of metaphorical communication and infomediaries’ evaluations.” Academy of Management Journal, 61: 1196–1230.
69.
KouzesJ. M.PosnerB. Z.1993Credibility: How Leaders Gain and Lose It and Why People Demand It. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
70.
KristofA. L.1996 “Person–organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications.” Personnel Psychology, 49: 1–49.
71.
KuklinskiJ. H.HurleyN. L.1994 “On hearing and interpreting political messages: A cautionary tale of citizen cue-taking.” Journal of Politics, 56: 729–751.
LaxJ. R.PhillipsJ. H.2009 “Gay rights in the states: Public opinion and policy responsiveness.” American Political Science Review, 103: 367–386.
74.
LaymanG. C.CarseyT. M.HorowitzJ. M.2006 “Party polarization in American politics: Characteristics, causes, and consequences.” Annual Review of Political Science, 9: 83–110.
75.
LeeY.NgS.ShevlinT. J.VenkatA.2021 “The effects of tax avoidance news on employee perceptions of managers and firms: Evidence from Glassdoor.com ratings.” Accounting Review, 96: 343–372.
LungeanuR.WeberK.2021 “Social responsibility beyond the corporate: Executive mental accounting across sectoral and issue domains.” Organization Science, 32: 1473–1491.
79.
MaelF.AshforthB. E.1992 “Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification.” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13: 103–123.
80.
MaitlisS.LawrenceT. B.2007 “Triggers and enablers of sensegiving in organizations.” Academy of Management Journal, 50: 57–84.
81.
MalkaA.LelkesY.SrivastavaS.CohenA. B.MillerD. T.2012 “The association of religiosity and political conservatism: The role of political engagement.” Political Psychology, 33: 275–299.
82.
MathieuJ. E.ZajacD. M.1990 “A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment.” Psychological Bulletin, 108: 171–194.
83.
MayerD.2017 “The law and ethics of CEO social activism.” Journal of Law, Business, & Ethics, 23: 21–44.
MeindlJ. R.1995 “The romance of leadership as a follower-centric theory: A social constructionist approach.” Leadership Quarterly, 6: 329–341.
86.
MeindlJ. R.EhrlichS. B.DukerichJ. M.1985 “The romance of leadership.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 30: 78–102.
87.
Melián-GonzálezS.Bulchand-GidumalJ.González López-ValcárcelB.2015 “New evidence of the relationship between employee satisfaction and firm economic performance.” Personnel Review, 44: 906–929.
OliverA. G.KrauseR.BusenbarkJ. R.KalmM.2018 “BS in the boardroom: Benevolent sexism and board chair orientations.” Strategic Management Journal, 39: 113–130.
95.
PfefferJ.1977 “The ambiguity of leadership.” Academy of Management Review, 2: 104–112.
96.
PfefferJ.1981 “Management as symbolic action: The creation and maintenance of organizational paradigms.” In CummingsL. L.StawB. M. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior: 1–52. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
97.
PorterL. W.SteersR. M.MowdayR. T.BoulianP. V.1974 “Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 59: 603–609.
98.
RankinL. E.JostJ. T.WakslakC. J.2009 “System justification and the meaning of life: Are the existential benefits of ideology distributed unequally across racial groups?” Social Justice Research, 22: 312–333.
SchwartzS.1996 “Value priorities and behavior: Applying a theory of integrated value systems.” In SeligmanC.OlsonJ. M.ZannaM. P. (eds.), The Psychology of Values: The Ontario Symposium: 1–24. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
101.
SemadeniM.WithersM. C.CertoT. S.2014 “The perils of endogeneity and instrumental variables in strategy research: Understanding through simulations.” Strategic Management Journal, 35: 1070–1079.
102.
ShamirB.HouseR. J.ArthurM. B.1993 “The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory.” Organization Science, 4: 577–594.
103.
SlussD. M.PloyhartR. E.CobbM. G.AshforthB. E.2012 “Generalizing newcomers’ relational and organizational identifications: Processes and prototypicality.” Academy of Management Journal, 55: 949–975.
104.
SnowD. A.BenfordR. D.1988 “Ideology, frame reference, and participant mobilization.” International Social Movement Research, 1: 197–217.
TajfelH.1982Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
107.
TajfelH.TurnerJ.1986 “The social identity of intergroup behavior.” In WorchelS.AustinW. (eds.), Psychology and Intergroup Relations: 7–24. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
108.
TedinK. L.1987 “Political ideology and the vote.” Research in Micropolitics, 2: 63–94.
109.
TerryD. J.HoggM. A.1996 “Group norms and the attitude–behavior relationship: A role for group identification.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22: 776–793.
110.
TetlockP. E.2000 “Cognitive biases and organizational correctives: Do both disease and cure depend on the politics of the beholder?”Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 293–326.
ToffelM. W.ChatterjiA. K.KelleyJ.2017 “CEO activism (A).” Harvard Business School Case, 617-001.
113.
TurnerJ. C.1985 “Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior.” In LawlerE. J. (ed.), Advances in Group Processes: 77–122. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
114.
TurnerJ. C.OakesP. J.HaslamS. A.McGartyC.1994 “Self and collective: Cognition and social context.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20: 454–463.
115.
van KnippenbergB.van KnippenbergD.2005 “Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: the moderating role of leader prototypicality.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 90: 25–37.
116.
van KnippenbergD.2011 “Embodying who we are: Leader group prototypicality and leadership effectiveness.” Leadership Quarterly, 22: 1078–1091.
117.
van KnippenbergD.HoggM. A.2003 “A social identity model of leadership effectiveness in organizations.” Research in Organizational Behavior, 25: 243–295.
118.
van KnippenbergD.van KnippenbergB.De CremerD.HoggM. A.2004 “Leadership, self, and identity: A review and research agenda.” Leadership Quarterly, 15: 825–856.
119.
VignolesV. L.RegaliaC.ManziC.GolledgeJ.ScabiniE.2006 “Beyond self-esteem: Influence of multiple motives on identity construction.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90: 308–333.
WestphalJ. D.ClementM. B.2008 “Sociopolitical dynamics in relations between top managers and security analysts: Favor rendering, reciprocity, and analyst stock recommendations.” Academy of Management Journal, 51: 873–897.
122.
WooldridgeJ. M.2013Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, 5th ed. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage.
123.
ZallerJ.1992The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
124.
ZellnerA.1962 “An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 57: 348–368.
125.
ZhangX.2006 “Information uncertainty and stock returns.” Journal of Finance, 61: 105–137.
126.
ZhaoH. H.SeibertS. E.TaylorM. S.LeeC.LamW.2016 “Not even the past: The joint influence of former leader and new leader during leader succession in the midst of organizational change.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 101: 1730–1738.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
