Researchers have explored in depth how social movement actors strive to pass laws to change organizations exogenously or to demand that they make commitments or policy changes. But ensuring that organizations implement such commitments or policies is challenging. Insider activists may be influential for implementation processes, and I explore how they can increase that influence. I contend that insider activists influence such processes by offering their organizations implementation resources, such as free and ready-to-use content and model programs that reflect changes the activists want to see. To develop this argument, I explore how, starting in the mid-2000s, LGBT activists developed resources to ensure that diversity policies were increasingly relevant for sexual minorities in France. Many diversity policies at the time expressed commitment to “gender, disability, age . . .” Activists contended that nothing was done for the minorities who were not named—those left in the ellipsis (. . .) of diversity. Using web archives and interviews, I show that LGBT rights activists increased their influence on French organizations by developing implementation resources that corporations could readily use to flesh out their diversity commitments and implement diversity programs to promote the inclusion of LGBT employees. I demonstrate how insider activists used these implementation resources to denounce organizations’ superficial commitments or employees’ homophobic practices, thereby compelling organizations to change.
AhmedS.2006“The nonperformativity of antiracism.” Meridians, 7: 104–126.
3.
AhmedS.2007“‘You end up doing the document rather than doing the doing’: Diversity, race equality and the politics of documentation.” Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30: 590–609.
4.
AhmedS.2012On Being Included: Racism and Diversity in Institutional Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
5.
AltE.CraigJ. B.2016“Selling issues with solutions: Igniting social intrapreneurship in for profit organizations.” Journal of Management Studies, 53: 794–820.
6.
AmentaE.CarenN.ChiarelloE.SuY.2010“The political consequences of social movements.” Annual Review of Sociology, 36: 287–307.
7.
AmentaE.YoungM. P.1999“Making an impact: Conceptual and methodological implications.” In GiugniM.McAdamD.TillyC. (eds.), How Social Movements Matter: Social Movements, Protest, and Contention, vol. 10: 22–41. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
8.
AndrewsK. T.2001“Social movements and policy implementation: The Mississippi civil rights movement and the war on poverty, 1965–1971.” American Sociological Review, 66: 71–95.
9.
BalsigerP.2018“Explaining dynamic strategies for defending company legitimacy: The changing outcomes of anti-sweatshop campaigns in France and Switzerland.” Business & Society, 57: 676–705.
10.
BansalP.2003“From issues to actions: The importance of individual concerns and organizational values in responding to natural environmental issues.” Organization Science, 14: 510–527.
11.
BaronD. P.2001“Private politics, corporate social responsibility, and integrated strategy.” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 10: 7–45.
12.
BaronD. P.DiermeierD.2007“Strategic activism and nonmarket strategy.” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 16: 599–634.
13.
BartleyT.2007“Institutional emergence in an era of globalization: The rise of transnational private regulation of labor and environmental conditions.” American Journal of Sociology, 113: 297–351.
14.
BartleyT.2010“Transnational private regulation in practice: The limits of forest and labor standards certification in Indonesia.” Business and Politics, 12: 1–34.
15.
BartleyT.ChildC.2014“Shaming the corporation: The social production of targets and the anti-sweatshop movement.” American Sociological Review, 79: 653–679.
16.
BellE. L. J. E.MeyersonD. E.NkomoS.ScullyM.2003“Interpreting silence and voice in the workplace: A conversation about tempered radicalism among black and white women researchers.” Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39: 381–414.
17.
BereniL.2011“Le discours de la diversité en entreprise: Genèse et appropriations.” Sociologies Pratiques, 23: 9–19.
18.
BereniL.2018Aux Frontières de la Raison des Affaires, Le Management de la Diversitéà New York et à Paris (Habilitation à Diriger des Recherches en Sociologie), vol. 2. Paris: Université Paris Nanterre.
19.
BereniL.EpsteinR.2015“Instrumenter la lutte contre les discriminations. Le ‘label diversité’ dans les collectivités territoriales.” Genre, inégalités, discriminations: 103. Ile-de-France.
20.
BernsteinM.1997“Celebration and suppression: The strategic uses of identity by the lesbian and gay movement.” American Journal of Sociology, 103: 531–565.
21.
BernsteinM.2005“Identity politics.” Annual Review of Sociology, 31: 47–74.
22.
BerreyE.2015The Enigma of Diversity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23.
BorrilloD.2002“Les instruments juridiques français et européens dans la mise en place du principe d’égalité et de non-discrimination.” Revue Française des affaires sociales, 109–129.
24.
BriscoeF.ChinM. K.HambrickD. C.2014“CEO ideology as an element of the corporate opportunity structure for social activists.” Academy of Management, 57: 1786–1809.
25.
BriscoeF.GuptaA.2016“Social activism in and around organizations.” Academy of Management Annals, 10: 671–727.
26.
BriscoeF.GuptaA.AnnerM. S.2015“Social activism and practice diffusion.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 60: 300–332.
27.
BriscoeF.SaffordS.2008“The Nixon-in-China effect: Activism, imitation, and the institutionalization of contentious practices.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 53: 460–491.
28.
BriscoeF.WardellM.SawyerS.2011“Membership has its privileges? Contracting and access to jobs that accommodate work–life needs.” ILR Review, 64: 258–282.
29.
BromleyP.PowellW. W.2012“From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk: Decoupling in the contemporary world.” Academy of Management Annals, 6: 483–530.
30.
BuchterL.2019“‘Companies can do better than the law’: Securing rights for minorities as an insider activist in French corporations.” In SaratA. (ed.), Legal Intermediation: A Processual Approach to Law and Economic Activity, vol. 81: 11–44. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.
31.
BuchterL.2020“Tell me your story: How recruitment practices implementing affirmative action laws may Undermine the laws’ goals.” Law & Social Inquiry, published online ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2019.79.
32.
CalvèsG.2005“Refléter la diversité de la population française: Naissance et développement d’un objectif flou.” Revue Internationale des Sciences Sociales, 183: 177–186.
33.
CarpenterD.2010Reputation and Power: Organizational Image and Pharmaceutical Regulation at the FDA. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
ChuangY.-T.ChurchR.OphirR.2010“Taking sides: The interactive influences of institutional mechanisms on the adoption of same-sex partner health benefits by Fortune 500 corporations, 1990–2003.” Organization Science, 22: 190–209.
36.
CreedW. E. D.ScullyM. A.2011“Songs of ourselves: Employees’ deployment of social identity in workplace encounters.” Journal of Management Inquiry, 20: 408–429.
37.
CreedW. E. D.ScullyM. A.AustinJ. R.2002“Clothes make the person? The tailoring of legitimating accounts and the social construction of identity.” Organization Science, 13: 475–496.
38.
DalyK.2007Qualitative Methods for Family Studies and Human Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
DeCellesK. A.SonensheinS.KingB. G.2019“Examining anger’s immobilizing effect on institutional insiders’ action intentions in social movements.” Administrative Science Quarterly, published online ahead of print. DOI: 10.1177/0001839219879646.
40.
DeJordyR.ScullyM.VentrescaM. J.CreedW. E. D.2020“Inhabited ecosystems: Propelling transformative social change between and through organizations.” Administrative Science Quarterly, published online ahead of print. DOI: 10.1177/0001839219899613.
41.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W.1983“The ion cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields.” American Sociological Review, 48: 147–160.
42.
DobbinF.2009Inventing Equal Opportunity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43.
DobbinF.KalevA.2016“What diversity programs fail, and what work better.” Harvard Business Review, July–Aug.:52–61.
44.
DoytchevaM.2009“Réinterprétations et usages sélectifs de la diversité dans les politiques des entreprises.” Raisons Politiques, 35: 107–123.
45.
DoytchevaM.2010“Usages français de la notion de diversité: Permanence et actualité d’un débat.” Sociologie, 1: 423–438.
46.
DoytchevaM.2015Politiques de la diversité: Sociologie des discriminations et des politiques antidiscriminatoires au travail. Pieterlen, Switzerland: PIE Peter Lang.
47.
DuttonJ. E.AshfordS. J.1993“Selling issues to top management.” Academy of Management Review, 18: 397–428.
48.
DuttonJ. E.AshfordS. J.O’NeillR. M.LawrenceK. A.2001“Moves that matter: Issue selling and organizational change.” Academy of Management Journal, 44: 716–736.
EdelmanL. B.2016Working Law: Courts, Corporations, and Symbolic Civil Rights. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
51.
EdelmanL. B.FullerS. R.Mara-DritaI.2001“Diversity rhetoric and the managerialization of law.” American Journal of Sociology, 106: 1589–1641.
52.
EdelmanL. B.KriegerL. H.EliasonS. R.AlbistonC. R.MellemaV.2011“When organizations rule: Judicial deference to institutionalized employment structures.” American Journal of Sociology, 117: 888–954.
53.
EdelmanL. B.LeachmanG.McAdamD.2010“On law, organizations, and social movements.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 6: 653–685.
54.
EdelmanL. B.SuchmanM. C.1997“The legal environments of organizations.” Annual Review of Sociology, 23: 479–515.
55.
EdelmanL. B.SuchmanM. C.1999“When the ‘haves’ hold court: Speculations on the organizational internalization of law.” Law & Society Review, 33: 941–992.
56.
EdelmanL. B.TaleshS. A.ParkerC.NielsenV. L.2011“To comply or not to comply—that isn’t the question: How organizations construct the meaning of compliance.” In ParkerC.NielsenV. L. (eds.), Explaining Compliance: Business Responses to Regulation: 103–122. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
57.
FalcozC.2004“Virilité et accès aux postes de pouvoir dans les organisations.” Travail, genre et societes, 12: 145–170.
58.
FalcozC.2008Homophobie Dans L’entreprise. Paris: La Documentation Francaise.
59.
FalcozC.BécuweA.2009“La gestion des minorités discréditables: Le cas de l’orientation sexuelle.” Travail, Genre et Sociétés, 21: 69–89.
60.
GaideA.KamE.2019“Militer avec ou contre la référente égalité femmes-hommes? Retour collectif sur des mobilisations étudiantes infructueuses.” Genre, sexualité & société, published online ahead of print. DOI: 10.4000/gss.5690.
61.
GiugniM.McAdamD.TillyC.1999How Social Movements Matter: Social Movements, Protest, and Contention. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
62.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L.1967The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. London: Aldine Transaction.
63.
GreenT. K.2016Discrimination Laundering: The Rise of Organizational Innocence and the Crisis of Equal Opportunity Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64.
GuptaA.BriscoeF.HambrickD.2018“Evenhandedness in resource allocation: Its relationship with CEO ideology, organizational discretion, and firm performance.” Academy of Management Journal, 61: 1848–1868.
65.
HallR. L.DeardorffA. V.2006“Lobbying as legislative subsidy.” American Political Science Review, 100: 69–84.
66.
HallettT.2010“The myth incarnate: Recoupling processes, turmoil, and inhabited institutions in an urban elementary school.” American Sociological Review, 75: 52–74.
Hertel-FernandezA.2014“Who passes business’s ‘model bills’? Policy capacity and corporate influence in U.S. state politics.” Perspectives on Politics, 12: 582–602.
69.
HirschmanA. O.1970Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
70.
Howard-GrenvilleJ.2007“Developing issue-selling effectiveness over time: Issue selling as resourcing.” Organization Science, 18: 560–577.
71.
JasperJ. M.PoulsenJ.1993“Fighting back: Vulnerabilities, blunders, and countermobilization by the targets in three animal rights campaigns.” Sociological Forum, 8: 639–657.
72.
JunterA.Sénac-SlawinskiR.2010“La diversité: sans droit ni obligation.” Revue de l’OFCE, 114: 167–195.
73.
KelloggK. C.2009“Operating room: Relational spaces and microinstitutional change in surgery.” American Journal of Sociology, 115: 657–711.
74.
KelloggK. C.2011“Hot lights and cold steel: Cultural and political toolkits for practice change in surgery.” Organization Science, 22: 482–502.
75.
KelloggK. C.2012“Making the cut: Using status-based countertactics to block social movement implementation and microinstitutional change in surgery.” Organization Science, 23: 1546–1570.
76.
KelloggK. C.2014“Brokerage professions and implementing reform in an age of experts.” American Sociological Review, 79: 912–941.
77.
KingB. G.2008“A political mediation model of corporate response to social movement activism.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 53: 395–421.
78.
KingB. G.2016“Reputation, risk and anti-corporate activism: How social movements influence corporate outcomes.” In BosiL.GiugniM.UbaK. (eds.), The Consequences of Social Movements: 215–236. New York: Cambridge University Press.
79.
KingB. G.PearceN. A.2010“The contentiousness of markets: Politics, social movements, and institutional change in markets.” Annual Review of Sociology, 36: 249–267.
80.
KippingM.LambergJ.-A.2016“History in process organization studies: What, why, and how.” In LangleyA.TsoukasH. (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Process Organization Studies: 303–320. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
81.
LauferJ.2009“L’égalité professionnelle entre les hommes et les femmes est-elle soluble dans la diversité? Summary, Zusammenfassung, Resumen.” Travail genre et sociétés, 21: 29–54.
82.
LauferW. S.2003“Social accountability and corporate greenwashing.” Journal of Business Ethics, 43: 253–261.
83.
LockeR. M.2013The Promise and Limits of Private Power: Promoting Labor Standards in a Global Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
84.
LyonT. P.MaxwellJ. W.2011“Greenwash: Corporate environmental disclosure under threat of audit.” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 20: 3–41.
85.
MahoneyL.ThorneL.CecilL.LagoreW.2013“A research note on standalone corporate social responsibility reports: Signaling or greenwashing?”Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24: 350–359.
86.
MarquisC.ToffelM. W.ZhouY.2016“Scrutiny, norms, and selective disclosure: A global study of greenwashing.” Organization Science, 27: 483–504.
87.
McDonnellM.-H.KingB. G.2013“Keeping up appearances: Reputational threat and impression management after social movement boycotts.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 58: 387–419.
88.
McDonnellM.-H.KingB. G.SouleS. A.2015“A dynamic process model of private politics: Activist targeting and corporate receptivity to social challenges.” American Sociological Review, 80: 654–678.
89.
MenaS.WaegerD.2014“Activism for corporate responsibility: Conceptualizing private regulation opportunity structures.” Journal of Management Studies, 51: 1091–1117.
90.
MeyerJ.RowanB.1977“Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology, 83: 340–363.
91.
MeyersonD. E.2001Tempered Radicals: How People Use Difference to Inspire Change at Work. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
92.
MeyersonD. E.ScullyM. A.1995“Tempered radicalism and the politics of ambivalence and change.” Organization Science, 6: 585–600.
93.
MorillC.ZaldM. N.RaoH.2003“Covert political conflict in organizations: Challenges from below.” Annual Review of Sociology, 29: 391–415.
94.
MunnellA. H.BrowneL. E.McEneaneyJ.1996“Mortgage lending in Boston: Interpreting HMDA data.” American Economic Review, 86: 25–53.
95.
PollettaF.1998“‘It was like a fever . . .’ Narrative and identity in social protest.” Social Problems, 45: 137–159.
96.
RaeburnN. C.2000The Rise of Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Rights in the Workplace. Unpublished dissertation, Ohio State University.
97.
RaeburnN. C.2004Changing Corporate America from Inside Out: Lesbian and Gay Workplace Rights. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
98.
RiveraL. A.2012“Diversity within reach: Recruitment versus hiring in elite firms.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 639: 71–90.
99.
SantoroW. A.McGuireG. M.1997“Social movement insiders: The impact of institutional activists on affirmative action and comparable worth policies.” Social Problems, 44: 503–519.
100.
ScullyM.SegalA.2002“Passion with an umbrella: Grassroots activists in the workplace.” In LounsburyM.VentrescaM. J. (eds.), Social Structure and Organizations Revisited, vol. 19: 125–168. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.
101.
SénacR.2012L’invention de La Diversité. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
102.
SénacR.2015“La promotion de la diversité dans la fonction publique: De l’héritage républicain à une méritocratie néoliberale.” Revue française d’administration publique, 153: 165–182.
103.
SilbeyS. S.2013“Organizational challenges to regulatory enforcement and compliance: A new common sense about regulation.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 649: 6–20.
104.
SnowD. A.RochfordE. B.WordenS. K.BenfordR. D.1986“Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation.” American Sociological Review, 51: 464–481.
105.
SonensheinS.2013“How organizations foster the creative use of resources.” Academy of Management Journal, 57: 814–848.
106.
SouleS. A.2009Contention and Corporate Social Responsibility. New York: Cambridge University Press.
107.
SouleS. A.KingB. G.2006“The stages of the policy process and the Equal Rights Amendment, 1972–1982.” American Journal of Sociology, 111: 1871–1909.
108.
SpicerA.AlvessonM.KärremanD.2009“Critical performativity: The unfinished business of critical management studies.” Human Relations, 62: 537–560.
109.
TaleshS. A.2015“Legal intermediaries: How insurance companies construct the meaning of compliance with antidiscrimination laws.” Law & Policy, 37: 209–239.
110.
TaleshS. A.PélisseJ.2019“How legal intermediaries facilitate or inhibit social change.” In SaratA. (ed.), Studies in Law, Politics and Society, vol. 79: 111–145. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.
111.
TaylorV. A.RaeburnN. C.1995“Identity politics as high-risk activism: Career consequences for lesbian, gay, and bisexual sociologists.” Social Problems, 42: 252–273.
112.
VaaraE.LambergJ.-A.2016“Taking historical embeddedness seriously: Three historical approaches to advance strategy process and practice research.” Academy of Management Review, 41: 633–657.
113.
WaegerD.WeberK.2017“Institutional complexity and organizational change: An open polity perspective.” Academy of Management Review, 44: 336–359.
114.
WeberK.WaegerD.2017“Organizations as polities: An open systems perspective.” Academy of Management Annals, 11: 886–918.
115.
WhitemanG.KennedyS.2016“Sustainability as process.” In LangleyA.TsoukasH. (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Process Organization Studies: 417–431. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
116.
YatesL.2015“Rethinking prefiguration: Alternatives, micropolitics and goals in social movements.” Social Movement Studies, 14: 1–21.
117.
ZaldM. N.2005“The strange career of an idea and its resurrection: Social movements in organizations.” Journal of Management Inquiry, 14: 157–166.
118.
ZaldM. N.BergerM. A.1978“Social movements in organizations: Coup d’etat, insurgency, and mass movements.” American Journal of Sociology, 83: 823–861.
119.
ZanoniP.JanssensM.2015“The power of diversity discourses at work: On the interlocking nature of diversities and occupations.” Organization Studies, 36: 1463–1483.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
