Barriers to entry in regulated markets are frequently conceptualized as static features that must be removed or overcome if new entrants are to successfully enter a market. But government institutions regulating markets often comprise multiple levels that exist in tension with one another due to differing incentives and motivations. We argue that the principal–agent tension between elected officials and agency bureaucrats may render regulatory barriers to entry more malleable, even in the absence of formal policy changes. To test this proposition, we bring the administrative state center stage and examine how regulatory discretion—regulatory agencies’ flexibility to interpret and implement public policies created by elected officials—can influence the market entry of new ventures. Using data on regulatory approval of hydroelectric facilities in the United States from 1978 to 2014, we find that increased state agency discretion improves outcomes for new ventures relative to incumbent firms by freeing regulatory agency officials to interpret and implement policies according to a professional motivation of public service and reducing incumbents’ political influence.
AdamsP.FontanaR.MalerbaF.2017 “Bridging knowledge resources: The location choices of spinouts.” Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 11: 93–121.
2.
AdlerE.1992 “The emergence of cooperation: National epistemic communities and the international evolution of the idea of nuclear arms control.” International Organization, 46: 101–145.
3.
AlexanderR.MazzaS.ScholzS.2009 “Measuring rates of return for lobbying expenditures: An empirical analysis under the American Jobs Creation Act.” Journal of Law and Politics, 25: 401–457.
4.
AlmandozJ.2012 “Arriving at the starting line: The impact of community and financial logics on new banking ventures.” Academy of Management Journal, 55: 1381–1406.
5.
ArmaniosD. E.EesleyC. E.LiJ.EisenhardtK. M.2017 “How entrepreneurs leverage institutional intermediaries in emerging economies to acquire public resources.” Strategic Management Journal, 38: 1373–1390.
6.
BansalP.HoffmanA. J.2012The Oxford Handbook of Business and the Natural Environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7.
BarkowR.2010 “Insulating agencies: Avoiding capture through institutional design.” Texas Law Review, 89: 15–79.
8.
BaronJ. N.DobbinF. R.JenningsP. D.1986 “War and peace: The evolution of modern personnel administration in U.S. industry.” American Journal of Sociology, 92: 350–383.
9.
BattilanaJ.DoradoS.2010 “Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations.” Academy of Management Journal, 53: 1419–1440.
10.
BattilanaJ.LeeM.2014 “Advancing research on hybrid organizing—Insights from the study of social enterprises.” Academy of Management Annals, 8: 397–441.
11.
BesleyT.CaseA.2003 “Political institutions and policy choices: Evidence from the United States.” Journal of Economic Literature, 41: 7–73.
12.
BiberE.RuhlJ.2014 “The permit power revisited: The theory and practice of regulatory permits in the administrative state.” Duke Law Journal, 64: 131–234.
13.
BonardiJ.-P.HolburnG. L. F.Vanden BerghR. G.2006 “Nonmarket strategy performance: Evidence from U.S. electric utilities.” Academy of Management Journal, 49: 1209–1228.
14.
BrownC.2011 “Uncooperative federalism, misguided textualism: The federal courts’ mistaken hostility toward pre-discharge regulation of confined animal feeding operations under the Clean Water Act.” Temple Journal of Science, Technology and Environmental Law, 30: 175–219.
15.
CalvertR. L.McCubbinsM.WeingastB.1989 “A theory of political control and agency discretion.” American Journal of Political Science, 33: 588–611.
16.
CarpenterD.2002 “Groups, the media, agency waiting costs, and FDA drug approval.” American Journal of Political Science, 46: 490–505.
17.
CarpenterD.MossD.2013Preventing Regulatory Capture: Special Interest Influence and How To Limit It. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
CobbJ. A.WryT.ZhaoE. Y.2016 “Funding financial inclusion: Institutional logics and the contextual contingency of funding for microfinance organizations.” Academy of Management Journal, 59: 2103–2131.
19.
ColemanJ.1999 “Unified government, divided government, and party responsiveness.” American Political Science Review, 93: 821–835.
20.
ContiR.ValentiniG.2017 “Super partes? Assessing the effect of judicial independence on entry.” Management Science, 64: 3517–3535.
Dal BóE. 2006 “Regulatory capture: A review.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22: 203–225.
23.
DeanT. J.BrownR. L.1995 “Pollution regulation as a barrier to new firm entry: Initial evidence and implications for future research.” Academy of Management Journal, 38: 288–303.
24.
DeanT. J.BrownR. L.StangoV.2000 “Environmental regulation as a barrier to the formation of small manufacturing establishments: A longitudinal examination.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 40: 56–75.
25.
DelmasM.RussoM.Montes-SanchoM.2007 “Deregulation and environmental differentiation in the electric utility industry.” Strategic Management Journal, 28: 189–209.
26.
DelmasM.TokatY.2005 “Deregulation, governance structures, and efficiency: The U.S. electric utility sector.” Strategic Management Journal, 26: 441–460.
27.
DjankovS.La PortaR.Lopez-de-SilanesF.ShleiferA.2002 “The regulation of entry.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117: 1–37.
28.
DobbinF.1992 “The origins of private social insurance: Public policy and fringe benefits in America, 1920–1950.” American Journal of Sociology, 97: 1416–1450.
29.
DobbinF.DowdT. J.1997 “How policy shapes competition: Early railroad foundings in Massachusetts.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 501–529.
30.
DobbinF.DowdT. J.2000 “The market that antitrust built: Public policy, private coercion, and railroad acquisitions, 1825 to 1922.” American Sociological Review, 65: 631–657.
31.
DorobantuS.KaulA.ZelnerB.2017 “Nonmarket strategy research through the lens of new institutional economics: An integrative review and future directions.” Strategic Management Journal, 38: 114–140.
32.
DoshiA.DowellG.ToffelM.2013 “How firms respond to mandatory information disclosure.” Strategic Management Journal, 34: 1209–1231.
33.
DowellG.DavidR.2011 “Effects of ancestral populations on entrepreneurial founding and failure: Private liquor stores in Alberta, 1994–2003.” Industrial and Corporate Change, 20: 825–853.
34.
DowellG.KillalyB.2009 “Effect of resource variation and firm experience on market entry decisions: Evidence from U.S. telecommunication firms’ international expansion decisions.” Organization Science, 20: 69–84.
35.
EberhartR. N.EesleyC. E.EisenhardtK. M.2017 “Failure is an option: Institutional change, entrepreneurial risk, and new firm growth.” Organization Science, 28: 93–112.
36.
EdelmanL. B.SuchmanM. G.1997 “The legal environments of organizations.” Annual Review of Sociology, 23: 479–515.
37.
EesleyC.2016 “Institutional barriers to growth: Entrepreneurship, human capital and institutional change.” Organization Science, 27: 1290–1306.
38.
Environmental Law Institute (ELI)2013 “State constraints: State imposed limitations on the authority of agencies to regulate waters beyond the scope of the federal Clean Water Act.” Retrieved from http://www.eli.org/sites/default/files/eli-pubs/d23–04.pdf.
39.
EvansP.1995Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40.
EvansP.RueschemeyerD.SkocpolT.1985Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
FligsteinN.1990The Transformation of Corporate Control. Boston: Harvard University Press.
43.
GailmardS.PattyJ.2007 “Slackers and zealots: Civil service, policy discretion, and bureaucratic expertise.” American Journal of Political Science, 51: 873–889.
44.
GerberB.TeskeP.2000 “Regulatory policymaking in the American states: A review of theories and evidence.” Political Research Quarterly, 53: 849–886.
GursesK.OzcanP.2015 “Entrepreneurship in regulated markets: Framing contests and collective action to introduce pay TV in the US.” Academy of Management Journal, 58: 1709–1739.
47.
HaasP.2015Epistemic Communities, Constructivism, and International Environmental Politics. New York: Routledge.
48.
HadaniM.SchulerD.2013 “In search of El Dorado: The elusive financial returns on corporate political investments.” Strategic Management Journal, 34: 165–181.
49.
HechtA.2004 “Obstacles to the devolution of environmental protection: States’ self-imposed limitations on rulemaking.” Duke Environmental Law and Policy Forum, 15: 105–162.
50.
HerschP.NetterJ.PopeC.2008 “Do campaign contributions and lobbying expenditures by firms create ‘political’ capital?” Atlantic Economic Journal, 36: 395–405.
51.
HiattS. R.CarlosW. C.2019 “From farms to fuel tanks: Stakeholder framing contests and entrepreneurship in the emergent U.S. biodiesel market.” Strategic Management Journal, 40: 865–893.
52.
HiattS. R.CarlosW. C.SineW. D.2018 “Manu Militari: The institutional contingencies of stakeholder relationships on entrepreneurial performance.” Organization Science, 29: 633–652.
53.
HiattS. R.GrandyJ. B.LeeB. H.2015 “Organizational responses to public and private politics: An analysis of climate change activists and U.S. oil and gas firms.” Organization Science, 26: 1769–1786.
54.
HiattS.ParkS.2013 “Lords of the harvest: Third-party influence and regulatory approval of genetically modified organisms.” Academy of Management Journal, 56: 923–944.
55.
HiattS.SineW.TolbertP.2009 “From Pabst to Pepsi: The deinstitutionalization of social practices and the creation of entrepreneurial opportunities.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 54: 635–667.
56.
HillM.KellyG.LockhartG. B.NessR. A.2013 “Determinants and effects of corporate lobbying.” Financial Management, 42: 931–957.
57.
HillmanA.HittM.1999 “Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions.” Academy of Management Review, 24: 825–842.
58.
HillmanA.KeimG.SchulerD.2004 “Corporate political activity: A review and research agenda.” Journal of Management, 30: 837–857.
59.
HoffmanA.1999 “Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the U.S. chemical industry.” Academy of Management Journal, 42: 351–371.
60.
HoffmanA.JenningsP. D.2018Re-engaging with Sustainability in the Anthropocene Era: An Institutional Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61.
HolburnG. L. F.Vanden BerghR. G.2008 “Making friends in hostile environments: Political strategy in regulated industries.” Academy of Management Review, 33: 521–540.
62.
HuberJ.ShipanC.2002Deliberate Discretion?The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63.
IngramP.SimonsT.2000 “State formation, ideological competition, and the ecology of Israeli workers’ cooperatives, 1920–1992.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 25–53.
64.
KahnM.1997 “Particulate pollution trends in the United States.” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 27: 87–107.
65.
KalevA.ShenhavY.De VriesD.2008 “The state, the labor process, and the diffusion of managerial models.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 53: 1–28.
66.
KaltJ.ZupanM.1990 “The apparent ideological behavior of legislators: Testing for principal–agent slack in political institutions.” Journal of Law and Economics, 33: 103–131.
67.
KapoorR.AdnerR.2012 “What firms make vs. what they know: How firms’ production and knowledge boundaries affect competitive advantage in the face of technological change.” Organization Science, 23: 1227–1248.
68.
KayA.JostJ.2003 “Complementary justice: Effects of ‘poor but happy’ and ‘poor but honest’ stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85: 823–837.
69.
KeiserL.1999 “State bureaucratic discretion and the administration of social welfare programs: The case of Social Security Disability.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9: 87–106.
70.
KeiserL.SossJ.1998 “With good cause: Bureaucratic discretion and the politics of child support enforcement.” American Journal of Political Science, 42: 1133–1156.
71.
KellyM.1994 “Theories of justice and street-level discretion.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 4: 119–140.
72.
KimE.-H.LyonT. P.2015 “Greenwash vs. brownwash: Exaggeration and undue modesty in corporate sustainability disclosure.” Organization Science, 26: 705–723.
73.
KimJ. H.2019 “Is your playing field unleveled? U.S. defense contracts and foreign firm lobbying.” Strategic Management Journal, 40: 1911–1937.
74.
KingB. G.FelinT.WhettenD. A.2010 “Finding the organization in organizational theory: A meta-theory of the organization as a social actor.” Organization Science, 21: 290–305.
75.
KingB. G.SouleS. A.2007 “Social movements as extra-institutional entrepreneurs: The effect of protests on stock price returns.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 52: 413–442.
76.
KlapperL.LoveI.2010 “The impact of business environment reforms on new firm registration.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 5493.
77.
LeitzingerJ.KingB. G.BriscoeF.2018 “Introduction: Integrating research perspectives on business and society.” In Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 56: 1–18. Bingley, UK: Emerald Insight.
78.
LevineM.ForrenceJ.1990 “Regulatory capture, public interest, and the public agenda: Toward a synthesis.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 6: 167–198.
79.
LewisD.2004Presidents and the Politics of Agency Design: Political Insulation in the United States Government Bureaucracy, 1946–1997. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
80.
LingleR.2010 “The constitutionality and economic impacts of federal jurisdiction of wetlands: The Clean Water Restoration Act of 2009.” Florida Law Review, 62: 1091–1118.
81.
LipskyM.1969 “Toward a theory of street-level bureaucracy.”Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin.
82.
LipskyM.1980Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
83.
LipskyM.2010Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
84.
ListJ. A.2003 “Effects of environmental regulations on manufacturing plant births: Evidence from a propensity score matching estimator.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 85: 944–952.
85.
ListJ. A.McHoneW. W.MillimetD. L.2003 “Effects of air quality regulation on the destination choice of relocating plants.” Oxford Economic Papers, 55: 657–678.
86.
LivermoreM. A.ReveszR. L.2012 “Regulatory review, capture, and agency inaction.” Georgetown Law Journal, 101: 1337–1398.
87.
LordM.2000 “Corporate political strategy and legislative decision making: The impact of corporate legislative influence activities.” Business and Society, 39: 76–93.
88.
LounsburyM.VentrescaM.HirschP. M.2003 “Social movements, field frames and industry emergence: A cultural–political perspective on US recycling.” Socio-economic Review, 1: 71–104.
89.
LuoJ.KaulA.SeoH.2018 “Winning us with trifles: Adverse selection in the use of philanthropy as insurance.” Strategic Management Journal, 39: 2591–2617.
90.
MaguireS.HardyC.2009 “Discourse and deinstitutionalization: The decline of DDT.” Academy of Management Journal, 52: 148–178.
91.
MarquisC.LounsburyM.2007 “Vive la résistance: Competing logics and the consolidation of U.S. community banking.” Academy of Management Journal, 50: 799–820.
92.
MatsusakaJ. G.2020Let the People Rule: How Direct Democracy Can Meet the Populist Challenge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
93.
Maynard-MoodyS.MushenoM.2000 “State agent or citizen agent: Two narratives of discretion.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10: 329–358.
94.
McCubbinsM.1991 “Party governance and U.S. budget deficits: Divided government and fiscal stalemate.” In AlesinaA.CarlinerG. (eds.), Politics and Economics in the Eighties: 83–122. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
95.
McCubbinsM.NollR.WeingastB.1987 “Administrative procedures as instruments of political control.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 3: 243–277.
96.
McCubbinsM.NollR.WeingastB.1989 “Structure and process, politics and policy: Administrative arrangements and the political control of agencies.” Virginia Law Review, 75: 431–482.
97.
McCubbinsM.SchwartzT.1984 “Congressional oversight overlooked: Police patrols versus fire alarms.” American Journal of Political Science, 28: 165–179.
98.
McDonnellM.WernerT.2016 “Blacklisted businesses: Social activists’ challenges and the disruption of corporate political activity.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 61: 584–620.
99.
MeloM. A.PereiraC.WerneckH.2010 “Delegation dilemmas: Coalition size, electoral risk, and regulatory governance in new democracies.” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 35: 31–56.
100.
MeyerR.Egger-PeitlerI.HöllererM.HammerschmidG.2014 “Of bureaucrats and passionate public managers: Institutional logics, executive identities, and public service motivation.” Public Administration, 92: 861–885.
101.
MillJ. S.1958Considerations on Representative Government, ShieldsC. V. (ed.). (First published in 1861.) New York: Liberal Arts Press.
102.
MillerG.2005 “The political evolution of principal–agent models.” Annual Review of Political Science, 8: 203–225.
MitchellW.1989 “Whether and when? Probability and timing of incumbents’ entry into emerging industrial subfields.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 34: 208–230.
105.
MizruchiM.1992The Structure of Corporate Political Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
NavisC.GlynnM. A.2010 “How new market categories emerge: Temporal dynamics of legitimacy, identity, and entrepreneurship in satellite radio, 1990–2005.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 55: 439–471.
109.
NelsonA. J.2014 “From the ivory tower to the startup garage: Organizational context and commercialization processes.” Research Policy, 43: 1144–1156.
110.
NiskanenW. A.1971Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction.
111.
OwenD.2017 “Little streams and legal transformations.” Utah Law Review, 1: 1–55.
112.
OzcanP.GursesK.2018 “Playing cat and mouse: Contests over regulatory categorization of dietary supplements in the United States.” Academy of Management Journal, 61: 1789–1820.
113.
PachecoD.YorkJ.HargraveT.2014 “The coevolution of industries, social movements, and institutions: Wind power in the United States.” Organization Science, 25: 1609–1632.
114.
PangC.RathJ.2007 “The force of regulation in the land of the free: The persistence of Chinatown, Washington DC as a symbolic ethnic enclave.” In RuefM.LounsburyM. (eds.), The Sociology of Entrepreneurship: Research in the Sociology of Organizations: 191–216. Amsterdam: Emerald Group.
115.
PerryJ.1996 “Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct validity.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6: 5–22.
116.
PerryJ.HondeghemA.2008Motivation in Public Management: The Call of Public Service. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
117.
PerryJ.WiseL.1990 “The motivational bases of public service.” Public Administration Review, 50: 367–373.
118.
PiresR.2011 “Beyond the fear of discretion: Flexibility, performance, and accountability in the management of regulatory bureaucracies.” Regulation and Governance, 5: 43–69.
119.
PotoskiM.1999 “Managing uncertainty through bureaucratic design: Administrative procedures and state air pollution control agencies.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9: 623–640.
120.
PotoskiM.WoodsN.2001 “Designing state clean air agencies: Administrative procedures and bureaucratic autonomy.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11: 203–222.
121.
PressmanJ. L.WildavskyA.1984Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland; or, Why It’s Amazing That Federal Programs Work at All, This Being a Saga of the Economic Development Administration as Told by Two Sympathetic Observers Who Seek to Build Morals on a Foundation of Ruined Hopes. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
122.
RaaphorstN.2018 “How to prove, how to interpret and what to do? Uncertainty experiences of street-level tax officials.” Public Management Review, 20: 485–502.
123.
RaaphorstN.GroeneveldS.Van de WalleS.2018 “Do tax officials use double standards in evaluating citizen-clients? A policy-capturing study among Dutch frontline tax officials.” Public Administration, 96: 134–153.
124.
RawhouserH.CummingsM.HiattS. R.2019 “Does a common mechanism engender common results? Sustainable development tradeoffs in the global carbon offset market.” Academy of Management Discoveries, 5: 514–529.
125.
ReinhardtF. L.2000Down to Earth: Applying Business Principles to Environmental Management. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
126.
ReinhardtF. L.HiattS. R.2012 “Colbún and the future of Chile’s power.”Harvard Business School Case 713047. Boston, MA.
127.
RidgeJ.IngramA.HillA.2017 “Beyond lobbying expenditures: How lobbying breadth and political connectedness affect firm outcomes.” Academy of Management Journal, 60: 1138–1163.
128.
RinfretS.CookJ.PautzM.2014 “Understanding state rulemaking processes: Developing fracking rules in Colorado, New York, and Ohio.” Review of Policy Research, 31: 88–104.
129.
RingquistE.1995 “Political control and policy impact in EPA’s Office of Water Quality.” American Journal of Political Science, 39: 336–363.
130.
RussoM.2001 “Institutions, exchange relations, and the emergence of new fields: Regulatory policies and independent power production in America, 1978–1992.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 57–86.
131.
SabatierP.MazmanianD.1980 “The implementation of public policy: A framework of analysis.” Policy Studies Journal, 8: 538–560.
132.
SeoM.-G.CreedW. E. D.2002 “Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective.” Academy of Management Review, 27: 222–247.
133.
ShipanC. R.2004 “Regulatory regimes, agency actions, and the conditional nature of congressional influence.” American Political Science Review, 98: 467–480.
134.
SimonsT.IngramP.2003 “Enemies of the state: The interdependence of institutional forms and the ecology of the kibbutz, 1910–1997.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 592–621.
135.
SineW. D.HavemanH. A.TolbertP. S.2005 “Risky business? Entrepreneurship in the new independent-power sector.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 50: 200–232.
136.
SineW. D.LeeB. H.2009 “Tilting at windmills? The environmental movement and the emergence of the U.S. wind energy sector.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 54: 123–155.
137.
SkocpolT.1985 “Bringing the state back in: Strategies for analysis in current research.” In EvansP.RueschemeyerD.SkocpolT. (eds.), Bringing the State Back In: 3–43. New York: Cambridge University Press.
138.
SkocpolT.FinegoldK.1982 “State capacity and economic intervention in the early New Deal.” Political Science Quarterly, 97: 255–278.
139.
SpillerP.1996 “Institutions and commitment.” Industrial and Corporate Change, 5: 421–452.
140.
SpillerP.UrbiztondoS.1994 “Political appointees vs. career civil servants: A multiple principals theory of political institutions.” European Journal of Political Economy, 10: 465–497.
141.
UngsonG.JamesC.SpicerB.1985 “The effects of regulatory agencies on organizations in wood products and high technology/electronics industries.” Academy of Management Journal, 28: 426–445.
VandelloJ. A.GoldschmiedN.MichniewiczK.2016 “Underdogs as heroes.” In AllisonS.KramerR.GoethalsG. (eds.), Handbook of Heroism: 339–355. New York: Taylor and Francis.
148.
WagnerW.2005 “Stormy regulation: The problems that result when stormwater (and other) regulatory programs neglect to account for limitations in scientific and technical information.” Chapman Law Review, 9: 191–232.
149.
WalkerE.ReaC.2014 “The political mobilization of firms and industries.” Annual Review of Sociology, 40: 281–304.
150.
WebbJ. W.TihanyiL.IrelandR. D.SirmonD. G.2009 “You say illegal, I say legitimate: Entrepreneurship in the informal economy.” Academy of Management Review, 34: 492–510.
151.
WeberM.1968Economy and Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
152.
WeingastB. R.1984 “The congressional–bureaucratic system: A principal agent perspective (with applications to the SEC).” Public Choice, 44: 147–191.
153.
WoodsN.2018 “Regulatory analysis procedures and political influence on bureaucratic policymaking.” Regulation and Governance, 12: 299–313.
154.
YorkJ.HargraveT.PachecoD.2016 “Converging winds: Logic hybridization in the Colorado wind energy field.” Academy of Management Journal, 59: 579–610.
155.
YorkJ.LenoxM. J.2014 “Exploring the sociocultural determinants of de novo versus de alio entry in emerging industries.” Strategic Management Journal, 35: 1930–1951.
156.
YorkJ.VedulaS.LenoxM. J.2018 “It’s not easy building green: The impact of public policy, private actors, and regional logics on voluntary standards adoption.” Academy of Management Journal, 61: 1492–1523.
157.
ZhaoE. Y.WryT.2016 “Not all inequality is equal: Deconstructing the societal logic of patriarchy to understand microfinance lending to women.” Academy of Management Journal, 59: 1994–2020.
158.
ZinnM. D.2002 “Policing environmental regulatory enforcement: Cooperation, capture, and citizen suits.” Stanford Environmental Law Journal, 21, 81.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
