We examine changes in the effectiveness of local civic action in relation to changes over time in racial diversity and income inequality. Local civic action comprises situations in which community members come together—typically with support from local organizations—to address common issues. The collective orientation of local civic action makes it sensitive to changes in local social conditions. As these changes unfold, local organizations become differentially able to support civic action. Here, our core argument features the process through which community members associate with different local organizations and how mandated versus voluntary association results in distinct responses to increased social and economic heterogeneity. We test this argument using three decades of data describing local campaigns of the annual Trick-or-Treat for UNICEF program. A baseline model shows that within-county increases in racial diversity and income inequality are associated with diminished campaign effectiveness. Subsequent models that separate out campaigns organized by schools, churches, and clubs show that schools are relatively more effective mobilizers as racial diversity and income inequality increase, arguably due to the greater demographic matching that is induced by mandated school participation.
AlesinaA.La FerraraE.2000 “Participation in heterogeneous communities.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115: 847–904.
2.
AlesinaA.La FerraraE.2005 “Ethnic diversity and economic performance.” Journal of Economic Literature, 43: 762–800.
3.
ArumR.2000 “Schools and communities: Ecological and institutional dimensions.” Annual Review of Sociology, 26: 395–418.
4.
BaggettaM.2016 “Representative bridging: Voluntary associations’ potential for creating bridging ties in demographically diverse urban areas.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45 (1S): 72S–94S.
5.
BarmanE.2007 “An institutional approach to donor control: From dyadic ties to a field-level analysis.” American Journal of Sociology, 112: 1416–1457.
6.
BianchiE.VohsK. D.2016 “Social class and social worlds: Income predicts the frequency and nature of social contact.” Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7: 479–486.
7.
BorgonoviF.2008 “Divided we stand, united we fall: Religious pluralism, giving, and volunteering.” American Sociological Review, 73: 105–128.
8.
BrowningC. R.CalderC. A.SollerB.JacksonA. L.DirlanJ.2017 “Ecological networks and neighborhood social organization.” American Journal of Sociology, 122: 1939–1988.
9.
CharlesJ. A.1993Service Clubs in American Society: Rotary, Kiwanis, and Lions. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
10.
ChaskinR. J.1997 “Perspectives on neighborhood and community: A review of the literature.” Social Service Review, 71: 521–547.
11.
ChristensonB.EdwardsK. L.EmersonM. O.2005Against All Odds: The Struggle for Racial Integration in Religious Organizations. New York: NYU Press.
12.
ColemanJ. S.HofferT.1987Public and Private High Schools. New York: Basic Books.
13.
DominaT.2005 “Leveling the home advantage: Assessing the effectiveness of parental involvement in elementary school.” Sociology of Education, 78 (J3): 233–249.
14.
DominaT.PennerA.PennerE.2017 “Categorical inequality: Schools as sorting mechanisms.” Annual Review of Sociology, 43: 311–330.
15.
DuttaS.2017 “Creating in the crucibles of nature’s fury: Associational diversity and local social entrepreneurship after national disasters in California, 1991–2010.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 62: 443–483.
16.
EcksteinS.2001 “Community as gift-giving: Collectivistic roots of volunteerism.” American Sociological Review, 66: 829–851.
17.
EliasophN.2011Making Volunteers: Civic Life after Welfare’s End. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18.
GesthuizenM.van de MeerT.ScheepersP.2009 “Ethnic diversity and social capital in Europe: Tests of Putnam’s thesis in European countries.” Scandinavian Political Studies, 32 (2): 121–142.
19.
GrønbjergK. A.PaarlbergL.2001 “Community variations in the size and scope of the nonprofit sector: Theory and preliminary findings.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30: 684–706.
20.
HabyarimanaJ.MumphreysM.PosnerD. N.WeinsteinJ. M.2007 “Why does ethnic diversity undermine public goods provision?” American Political Science Review, 101: 709–725.
21.
HealyK.2004 “Altruism as an organizational problem: The case of organ procurement.” American Sociological Review, 69: 387–404.
22.
HillJ. P.VaidyanathanB.2011 “Substitution or symbiosis? Assessing the relationship between religious and secular giving.” Social Forces, 90: 157–180.
23.
KalevA.2009 “Cracking the glass cages? Restructuring and ascriptive inequality at work.” American Journal of Sociology, 114: 1591–1643.
24.
LanceeB.Van de WerfhorstH. G.2012 “Income inequality and participation: A comparison of 24 European countries.” Social Science Research, 41: 1166–1178.
25.
LichtermanP.2008 “Religion and the construction of civic identity.” American Sociological Review, 73: 83–104.
26.
LichtermanP.EliasophN.2014 “Civic action.” American Journal of Sociology, 120: 798–863.
27.
LimC.MacGregorC. A.2012 “Religion and volunteering in context: Disentangling the contextual effects of religion on voluntary behavior.” American Sociological Review, 77: 747–779.
28.
MarquisC.BattilanaJ.2009 “Acting globally but thinking locally? The enduring influence of local communities on organizations.” In StawB. M.KramerR. M. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 29: 283–302. New York: Elsevier.
29.
MarquisC.DavisG. F.GlynnM. A.2013 “Golfing alone? Corporations, elites and nonprofit growth in 100 American communities.” Organization Science, 24: 39–57.
30.
MarquisC.GlynnM. A.DavisG. F.2007 “Community isomorphism and corporate social action.” Academy of Management Review, 32: 925–945.
31.
MarsdenR.2009 “The archipelago of faith: Religious individualism and faith community in America today.” American Journal of Sociology, 114: 1263–1303.
32.
MartinezB. C.DoughertyK. D.2013 “Race, belonging, and participation in religious congregations.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 52: 713–732.
33.
McNealR. B.Jr.1999 “Parental involvement as social capital: Differential effectiveness on science achievement, truancy, and dropping out.” Social Forces, 78: 117–144.
34.
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.1987 “Homophily in voluntary organizations: Status distance and the composition of face-to-face groups.” American Sociological Review, 71: 370–379.
35.
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.CookJ. M.2001 “Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks.” Annual Review of Sociology, 27: 415–444.
36.
MoellerS.AldersonA. S.NielsenF.2009 “Changing patterns of income inequality in U.S. counties, 1970 to 2000.” American Journal of Sociology, 114: 1037–1101.
37.
MoodyJ.2001 “Race, school integration, and friendship segregation in America.” American Journal of Sociology, 107: 679–716.
38.
NeckermanK. M.TorcheF.2007 “Inequality: Causes and consequences.” Annual Review of Sociology, 33: 335–357.
39.
NielsenF.AldersonA. S.1997 “The Kuznets curve and the great U–turn: Income inequality in U.S. counties, 1970 to 1990.” American Sociological Review, 62: 12–33.
40.
OfferS.SchneiderB.2007 “Children’s roles in generating social capital.” Social Forces, 85: 1125–1142.
41.
OliverJ. E.2001Democracy in Suburbia. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
42.
PaxtonP.2007 “Association memberships and generalized trust: A multilevel model across 31 countries.” Social Forces, 86: 47–76.
43.
PollettaF.1999 “‘Free spaces’ in collective action.” Theory and Society, 28: 1–38.
44.
PopielarzP. A.McPhersonJ. M.1995 “On the edge or in between: Niche position, niche overlap, and the duration of voluntary association memberships.” American Journal of Sociology, 101: 698–720.
45.
PutnamR. D.2000Bowling Alone. New York: Simon & Schuster.
46.
PutnamR. D.2007 “E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century.” Scandinavian Political Studies, 30 (2): 137–174.
47.
RaoH.DuttaS.2012 “Free spaces as organizational weapons of the weak: Religious festivals and regimental mutinies in the 1857 Bengali Native Army.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 57: 625–668.
48.
RossA. D.1953 “The social control of philanthropy.” American Journal of Sociology, 58: 451–460.
49.
RotoloT.WilsonJ.2014 “Social heterogeneity and volunteering in U.S. cities.” Sociological Forum, 29: 429–452.
50.
SampsonR. J.2013 “The place of context: A theory and strategy for criminology’s hard problems.” Criminology, 51: 1–31.
51.
SampsonR. J.McAdamD.MacIndoeH.Weffer-ElizondoS.2005 “Civil society reconsidered: The durable nature and community structure of collective civic action.” American Journal of Sociology, 111: 673–714.
52.
SampsonR. J.MorenoffJ. D.Gannon-RowleyT.2002 “Assessing neighborhood effects: Social processes and new directions in research.” Annual Review of Sociology, 28: 443–478.
53.
ScheitleC. P.DoughertyK. D.2010 “Race, diversity, and membership duration in religious congregations.” Sociological Inquiry, 80: 405–423.
54.
SchiemanS.2005 “Residential stability and the social impact of neighborhood disadvantage: A study of gender-and race-contingent effects.” Social Forces, 83: 1031–1064.
55.
SchudsonM.2006 “The varieties of civic experience.” Citizenship Studies, 10: 591–606.
56.
SmallM. L.2006 “Neighborhood institutions as resource brokers: Childcare centers, interorganizational ties, and resource access among the poor.” Social Problems, 53: 274–292.
57.
SmallM. L.2009Unanticipated Gains: Origins of Network Inequality in Everyday Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
58.
TarrowS. G.1998Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59.
TocquevilleA. de2000Democracy in America. MansfieldH. C.WinthropD., eds. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
60.
UslanerE. M.BrownM.2005 “Inequality, trust, and civic engagement.” American Politics Research, 33: 868–894.
61.
WhiteM. J.1986 “Segregation and diversity measures in population distribution.” Population Index, 52: 198–221.
62.
WilkinsonR. G.PickettK.2009The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better. London: Allen Lane.
63.
WilsonW. J.TaubR. P.2006There Goes the Neighborhood: Racial, Ethnic, and Class Tensions in Four Chicago Neighborhoods and Their Meaning for America. New York: Vintage Books.
64.
ZellnerA.1962 “An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 57: 348–368.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
