We examine how different occupational communities that are embedded in organizations exercise control processes to achieve emergent coordination as they create complex products together. We compare two types of organizations, equipment manufacturing and film production, and find that although occupational control was important for emergent coordination in both settings, this relationship varied according to two aspects of occupational embeddedness: organizational acknowledgment of occupational control and occupational interdependence. In the equipment manufacturing setting, occupational control was latent: the communities visibly conformed to organizational control processes while exercising occupational control behind the scenes to coordinate emergently. In the film setting, the organization granted the occupational community significant latitude over its tasks, which enabled members to coordinate emergently to solve problems the majority of the time. We propose that these two aspects of occupational embeddedness must be analyzed together with occupational control processes to explain how integration unfolds in knowledge-based settings in ways that organizational control processes are ill-equipped to manage.
AbbottA.1981 “Status and status strain in the professions.” American Journal of Sociology, 86: 819–835.
2.
AbbottA.1988The System of Professions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
AdlerP. S.BorysB.1996 “Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 61–89.
4.
AlvessonM.1995Management of Knowledge-intensive Companies. Berlin: de Gruyter.
5.
BarleyS. R.1996 “Technicians in the workplace: Ethnographic evidence for bringing work into organization studies.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 404–441.
6.
BarleyS. R.TolbertP. S.1991 “Introduction: At the intersection of organizations and occupations.” In BarleyS. R.TolbertP. S. (eds.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 8: 1–13. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
7.
BechkyB. A.2003a “Object lessons: Workplace artifacts as representations of occupational jurisdiction.” American Journal of Sociology, 109: 720–752.
8.
BechkyB. A.2003b “Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor.” Organization Science, 14: 312–330.
9.
BechkyB. A.2006 “Gaffers, gofers, and grips: Role-based coordination in temporary organizations.” Organization Science, 17: 3–21.
10.
BechkyB. A.OkhuysenG. A.2011 “Expecting the unexpected? How SWAT officers and film crews handle surprises.” Academy of Management Journal, 54: 239–261.
11.
BechkyB. A.O’MahonyS.2016 “Leveraging comparative field data for theory generation.” In ElsbachK. D.KramerR. M. (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Organizational Research: Innovative Pathways and Methods: 168–176. New York: Routledge.
12.
BelousR.1989The Contingent Economy: The Growth of the Temporary, Part-time, and Subcontracted Workforce. Washington, DC: National Planning Association.
13.
Ben-MenahemS. M.von KroghG.ErdenZ.SchneiderA.2016 “Coordinating knowledge creation in multidisciplinary teams: Evidence from early-stage drug discovery.” Academy of Management Journal, 59: 1308–1338.
14.
BielbyW. T.BielbyD. D.1999 “Organizational mediation of project-based labor markets: Talent agencies and the careers of screenwriters.” American Sociological Review, 64: 64–85.
15.
BigleyG. A.RobertsK. H.2001 “The incident command system: High-reliability organizing for complex and volatile task environments.” Academy of Management Journal, 44: 1281–1299.
16.
BriscoeF.2006 “Temporal flexibility and careers: The role of large-scale organizations for physicians.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 60: 88–104.
17.
BriscoeF.2007 “From iron cage to iron shield? How bureaucracy enables temporal flexibility for professional service workers.” Organization Science, 18: 297–314.
18.
BrownJ. S.DuguidP.1991 “Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation.” Organization Science, 2: 40–57.
19.
BrownJ. S.DuguidP.2001 “Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective.” Organization Science, 12: 198–213.
20.
Bureau of Labor Statistics2010Occupational Outlook Handbook (2010–2011). Washington, DC: Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office.
21.
ChildJ.FulkJ.1982 “Maintenance of occupational control: The case of professions.” Work and Occupations, 9: 155–192.
22.
CohanyS. R.1996 “Workers in alternative employment arrangements: A second look.” Monthly Labor Review, 119: 31–34.
23.
CrowstonK.1997 “A coordination theory approach to organizational process design.” Organization Science, 8: 157–175.
24.
CrowstonK.WeiK.LiQ.EseryelU. Y.HowisonJ.2005 “Coordination of free/libre and open source software development.” International Conference on Information Systems, Las Vegas, NV.
25.
DavisG. F.2003 “Book review symposium. James D. Thompson: Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory, reprint ed.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 502–504.
26.
DruckerP.1957Landmarks of Tomorrow: A Report on the New “Post-Modern” World. New York: Harper and Row.
27.
EdmondsonA. C.McManusS. E.2007 “Methodological fit in management field research.” Academy of Management Review, 32: 1155–1179.
28.
EdwardsR.1979Contested Terrain: The Transformation of the Workplace in America. New York: Basic Books.
29.
FarajS.SproullL.2000 “Coordinating expertise in software development teams.” Management Science, 46: 1554–1568.
30.
FarajS.XiaoY.2006 “Coordination in fast-response organizations.” Management Science, 52: 1155–1169.
31.
FreidsonE.1984 “The changing nature of professional control.” Annual Review of Sociology, 10: 1–20.
32.
FreidsonE.1994Professionalism Reborn: Theory, Prophecy, and Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33.
GirardM.StarkD.2003 “Heterarchies of value in Manhattan-based new media firms.” Theory, Culture and Society, 20: 77–105.
34.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L.1967The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine Transaction.
35.
GormanE.SandefurR.2011 “‘Golden Age,’ quiescence, and revival: How the sociology of professions became the study of knowledge-based work.” Work and Occupations, 38: 275–302.
36.
GouldnerA. W.1955 “Metaphysical pathos and the theory of bureaucracy.” American Political Science Review, 49: 496–507.
37.
HallR. H.1967 “Some organizational considerations in the professional–organizational relationship.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 12: 461–478.
38.
HallR. H.1968 “Professionalization and bureaucratization.” American Sociological Review, 33: 92–104.
39.
HargadonA. B.2003 “Book review symposium. James D. Thompson: Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory, reprint ed.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 498–501.
40.
HindsP. J.BaileyD. E.2003 “Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams.” Organization Science, 14: 615–632.
41.
HiningsR.2006 “The changing nature of professional organizations.” In AckroydS.BattR.ThompsonP.TolbertP. S. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Work and Organization: 404–424. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42.
HughesE. C.1958Men and Their Work. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
43.
HutchinsE.1991 “Organizing work by adaptation.” Organization Science, 2: 14–39.
44.
JonesC.1996 “Careers in project networks: The case of the film industry.” In ArthurM.RousseauD. (eds.), The Boundaryless Career: 58–75. New York: Oxford University Press.
45.
KelloggK. C.2009 “Operating room: Relational spaces and microinstitutional change in surgery.” American Journal of Sociology, 115: 657–711.
46.
KelloggK. C.OrlikowskiW. J.YatesJ.2006 “Life in the trading zone: Structuring coordination across boundaries in postbureaucratic organizations.” Organization Science, 17: 22–44.
47.
KleinK. J.ZiegertJ. C.KnightA. P.XiaoY.2006 “Dynamic delegation: Shared, hierarchical, and deindividualized leadership in extreme action teams.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 51: 590–621.
48.
LaveJ.WengerE.1991Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MajchrzakA.JarvenpaaS. L.HollingsheadA. B.2007 “Coordinating expertise among emergent groups responding to disasters.” Organization Science, 18: 147–161.
51.
MetiuA.2006 “Owning the code: Status closure in distributed groups.” Organization Science, 17: 418–435.
52.
MeyersonD.WeickK. E.KramerR. M.1996 “Swift trust and temporary groups.” In KramerR. M.TylerT. R. (eds.), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research: 166–195. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.1994Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
54.
NeffG.StarkD.2004 “Permanently beta.” In HowardP. N.JonesS. (eds.), Society Online: The Internet in Context: 173–188. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55.
NicoliniD.2009 “Zooming in and out: Studying practices by switching theoretical lenses and trailing connections.” Organization Studies, 30: 1391–1418.
56.
OkhuysenG. A.2005 “Understanding group behavior: How a police SWAT team creates, changes, and manages group routines.” In ElsbachK. D. (ed.), Qualitative Organizational Research: 139–168. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
57.
OkhuysenG. A.BechkyB. A.2009 “Coordination in organizations: An integrative perspective.” Academy of Management Annals, 3: 463–502.
58.
O’MahonyS.BechkyB. A.2006 “Stretchwork: Managing the career progression paradox in external labor markets.” Academy of Management Journal, 49: 918–941.
59.
PineK.MazmanianM.2017 “Artful and contorted coordinating: The ramifications of imposing formal logics of task jurisdiction on situated practice.” Academy of Management Journal, 60: 720–742.
60.
PowellW. W.SnellmanK.2004 “The knowledge economy.” Annual Review of Sociology, 30: 199–220.
61.
ScottW. R.1965 “Reactions to supervision in a heteronomous professional organization.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 10: 65–81.
62.
ScottW. R.1982 “Managing professional work: Three models of control for health organizations.” Health Services Research, 17: 213–240.
63.
SennettR.2008The Craftsman. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
64.
SimpsonR.1985 “Social control of occupations and work.” Annual Review of Sociology, 11: 415–436.
65.
StarkD.1999 “Heterarchy: Distributing authority and organizing diversity.” In ClippingerJ. H.III (ed.), The Biology of Business: Decoding the Natural Laws of Enterprise: 153–179. New York: Wiley.
66.
StraussA. L.CorbinJ. M.1990Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
67.
StraussA.SchatzmanL.EhrlichD.BucherR.SabshinMelvin1963 “The hospital and its negotiated order.” In FriedsonE. (ed.), The Hospital in Modern Society: 147–169. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
68.
VaastE.LevinaN.2006 “Multiple faces of codification: Organizational redesign in an IT organization.” Organization Science, 17: 190–201.
69.
ValentineM. A.EdmondsonA. C.2015 “Team scaffolds: How mesolevel structures enable role-based coordination in temporary groups.” Organization Science, 26: 405–422.
70.
Van MaanenJ. 2010 “Identity work and control in occupational communities.” In SitkinS. B.CardinalL. B.Bijlsma-FrankemaK. M. (eds.), Organizational Control: 111–167. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
71.
Van MaanenJ.BarleyS. R.1984 “Occupational communities: Culture and control in organizations.” In StawB. M.CummingsL. L. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 6: 287–365. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
