Drawing on interviews, archival material, and observation, this article investigates how and why, on two different occasions, actors at the Carlsberg Group headquartered in Denmark were inspired to use a particular historical artifact, the Latin phrase Semper Ardens, carved above a doorway. Used first as the inspiration for naming a new line of handcrafted beers, ten years later it became the motto featured in the company’s identity statement. Findings describe a temporal pattern of micro-level activities that accounts for how actors used this historical material and, in doing so, lent the authenticity of history to their actions, a phenomenon we term organizational historicizing. Analysis of historicizing activities revealed five micro-processes: rediscovering, recontextualizing, reclaiming, renewing, and re-embedding of an artifact in organizational history. Relationships between the micro-processes, explained in terms of authenticity, power, and identity, are theorized in a process model describing organizational historicizing. The findings show the importance of history when establishing claims to authenticity and how history becomes relevant to present and future activities. We also show that latent history can be revived for use in future historicizing.
AntebyM.MolnárV.2012 “Collective memory meets organizational identity: Remembering to forget in a firm’s rhetorical history.” Academy of Management Journal, 55: 515–540.
2.
BeverlandM.2005 “Crafting brand authenticity: The case of luxury wine.” Journal of Management Studies, 42: 1003–1029.
3.
BrannenM. Y.1992 “‘Bwana Mickey’: Constructing cultural consumption at Tokyo Disneyland.” In TobinJ. (ed.), Remade in Japan: Everyday Life and Consumer Taste in a Changing Society: 216–234. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
4.
BrannenM. Y.2004 “When Mickey loses face: Recontextualization, semantic fit and the semiotics of foreignness.” Academy of Management Review, 29: 593–616.
5.
BrunningeO.2009 “Using history in organizations: How managers make purposeful reference to history in strategy processes.” Journal of Organizational Change Management, 22: 8–26.
6.
BucheliM.WadhwaniR. D. (eds.) 2014The Future of the Past in Management and Organization Studies. Organizations in Time: History, Theory, Methods. New York: Oxford University Press.
7.
CarrollG. R.SwaminathanA.1992 “The organizational ecology of strategic groups in the American brewing industry from 1975 to 1990.” Industrial and Corporate Change, 1: 65–99.
8.
CarrollG. R.SwaminathanA.2000 “Why the microbrewery movement? Organizational dynamics of resource partitioning in the U.S. brewing industry.” American Journal of Sociology, 106: 715–762.
9.
CarrollG. R.WheatonD. R.2009 “The organizational construction of authenticity: An examination of contemporary food and dining in the U.S.” In StawB. M.BriefA. P. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 29: 255–282. New York: Elsevier.
10.
CaseyA. J.OliveraF.2011 “Reflections on organizational memory and forgetting.” Journal of Management Inquiry, 20: 305–310.
11.
CattaniG.DunbarR.ShapiraZ.2017 “How commitment to craftsmanship leads to unique value: Steinway & Sons’ differentiation strategy.” Strategy Science (forthcoming).
12.
ChreimS.2005 “The continuity–change duality in narrative texts of organizational identity.” Journal of Management Studies, 42: 567–591.
13.
ClarkP.1985 “A review of the theories of time and structure for organizational sociology.” In BacharachS. B.MitchellS. M. (eds.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 4: 35–79. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
14.
CoraiolaD. M.FosterW. M.SuddabyR.2015 “Varieties of history in organization studies.” In McLarenP. G.MillsA. J.WeatherbeeT. G. (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Management and Organizational History: 363–372. New York: Routledge.
15.
CorbinJ.StraussA.2008Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 3rd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
DanilovV.1992A Planning Guide for Corporate Museums, Galleries, and Visitor Centers. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
17.
DemersC.GirouxN.ChreimS.2003 “Merger and acquisition announcements as corporate wedding narratives.” Journal of Organizational Change Management, 16: 223–242.
18.
DouglasM.1986How Institutions Think. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
19.
DuncanC.1991 “Art museums and the ritual of citizenship.” In KarpI.LavineS. D. (eds.), Exhibiting Cultures: The Poetics and Politics of Museum Display: 88–103. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
20.
FosterW.SuddabyR.MinkusA.WiebeE.2011 “History as social memory assets: The example of Tim Hortons.” Management and Organizational History, 6: 101–120.
21.
GammelgaardJ.DörrenbächerC.2013 “Introduction.” In GammelgaardJ.DörrenbächerC. (eds.), The Global Brewery Industry: Markets, Strategies: 1–20. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
22.
GammelgaardJ.HobdariB.2013 “Subsidiary strategic responsibilities and autonomy in Carlsberg.” In GammelgaardJ.DörrenbächerC. (eds.), The Global Brewery Industry: Markets, Strategies: 199–222. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
23.
GlamannK.1990Bryggeren: J. C. Jacobsen på Carlsberg. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.
24.
GlamannK.FrenchK.1996Beer and Marble: Carl Jacobsen of New Carlsberg. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.
25.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L.1967The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
26.
HalbwachsM.1992On Collective Memory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
HatchM. J.SchultzM.2013 “The dynamics of corporate brand charisma: Routinization and activation at Carlsberg IT.” Scandinavian Journal of Management, 29: 147–162.
28.
HatchM. J.SchultzM.SkovA. M.2015 “Organizational identity and culture in the context of managed change: Transformation in the Carlsberg Group, 2009–2013.” Academy of Management Discoveries, 1 (1): 58–90.
29.
HernesT.2014A Process Theory of Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
Howard-GrenvilleJ.MetzgerM.MeyerA. D.2013 “Rekindling the flame: Processes of identity resurrection.” Academy of Management Journal, 56: 113–136.
31.
HussenotA.MissonierS.2016 “Encompassing stability and novelty in organization studies: An events-based approach.” Organization Studies, 37: 523–546.
32.
KaplanS.OrlikowskiW.2013 “Temporal work in strategy making.” Organization Science, 24: 965–995.
33.
KieserA.1994 “Why organization theory needs historical analyses—And how this should be performed.” Organization Science, 5: 608–620.
34.
KippingM.ÜsdikenB.2014 “History in organization and management theory: More than meets the eye.” Academy of Management Annals, 8: 535–588.
35.
KroezeR.KeulenS.2013 “Leading a multinational is history in practice: The use of invented traditions and narratives at AkzoNobel, Shell, Philips and ABN AMRO.” Business History, 55: 1265–1287.
36.
KroezenJ. J.HeugensP. P. M. A. R.2012 “Organizational identity formation: Processes of identity imprinting and enactment in the Dutch microbrewing landscape.” In SchultzM.MaguireS.LangleyA.TsoukasH. (eds.), Identity in and around Organizations: 89–128. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37.
KumarN.SternL. W.AndersonJ. C.1993 “Conducting interorganizational research using key informants.” Academy of Management Journal, 36: 1633–1651.
38.
LangleyA.1999 “Strategies for theorizing from process data.” Academy of Management Review, 24: 691–710.
39.
LangleyA.SmallmanC.TsoukasH.Van de VenA. H.2013 “Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity and flow.” Academy of Management Journal, 56: 1–13.
40.
LangleyA.TsoukasH.2010 “Introducing perspectives on organization studies.” In HernesT.MaitlisS. (eds.), Process, Sensemaking, and Organizing: 1–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G.1985Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
42.
LundeN.2008Hr. Møllers nye mand—Nils Smedegaard’s revolution på Esplanaden—og på Carlsberg. Copenhagen: Jyllandspostens Forlag.
43.
MaitlisS.ChristiansonM.2014 “Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward.” Academy of Management Annals, 8: 57–125.
44.
MeadG. H.1932The Philosophy of the Present. Chicago: Open Court Publishing.
45.
MoormanC.MinerA. S.1998 “Organizational improvisation and organizational memory.” Academy of Management Review, 23: 698–723.
46.
NissleyN.CaseyA.2002 “The politics of the exhibition: Viewing corporate museums through the paradigmatic lens of organizational memory.” British Journal of Management, 13: 35–46.
47.
OliveraF.2001 “Memory systems in organizations: An empirical investigation of mechanisms for knowledge collection, storage and access.” Journal of Management Studies, 37: 811–832.
48.
PetersonR. A.1997Creating Country Music: Fabricating Authenticity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49.
PetersonR. A.2005 “In search of authenticity.” Journal of Management Studies, 42: 1083–1098.
50.
ProustM.1997Marcel Proust on Art and Literature. TownsendS., trans. New York: Carroll & Graf.
51.
RavasiD.SchultzM.2006 “Responding to organizational identity threats: Exploring the role of organizational culture.” Academy of Management Journal, 49: 433–458.
52.
ReineckeJ.AnsariS.2015 “When times collide: Temporal brokerage at the intersection of markets and developments.” Academy of Management Journal, 58: 618–648.
53.
RowlinsonM. C.HassardJ.1993 “The invention of corporate culture: A history of the histories of Cadbury.” Human Relations, 46: 299–326.
54.
RowlinsonM. C.HassardJ.DeckerS.2014 “Research strategies for organizational history: A dialogue between historical theory and organization theory.” Academy of Management Review, 39: 250–274.
SteenstrupJ. C. H. R. 1922Carl Jacobsen’s liv og gerning. Copenhagen: Ny Carlsberg fondet.
57.
StiglianiI.RavasiD.2007 “Organizational artifacts and the expression of identity in corporate museums at Alfa-Romeo, Kartell, and Piaggio.” In LinL.RavasiD.RekomJ.SoenenG. (eds.), Organizational Identity in Practice: 197–214. New York: Routledge.
58.
SuddabyR.FosterW.TrankC. Q.2010 “Rhetorical history as a source of competitive advantage.” In BaumJ. A. C.LampelJ. (eds.), Advances in Strategic Management, vol. 27: The Globalization of Strategy Research: 147–173. Bingley, UK: Emerald.
59.
VandeVenA. H.2007Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
60.
WalshJ. P.UngsonG. R.1991 “Organizational memory.” Academy of Management Review, 16: 57–91.
61.
WeickK. E.1979The Social Psychology of Organizing, 2d ed. New York: McGraw Hill.
62.
WeickK. E.1995Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
63.
YbemaS.2014 “The invention of transitions: History as a symbolic site for discursive struggles over organizational change.” Organization, 21: 495–513.
64.
ZaheerS.AlbertS.ZaheerA.1999 “Time scales and organization theory.” Academy of Management Review, 24: 725–741.
65.
ZaldM. N.1993 “Organization studies as a scientific and humanistic enterprise—Toward a reconceptualization of the foundations of the field.” Organization Science, 4: 513–528.
66.
ZaldM. N.1996 “More fragmentation? Unfinished business in linking the social sciences and the humanities.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 251–261.
67.
ZundelM.HoltR.PoppA.2016 “Using history in the creation of organizational identity.” Management and Organizational History, 11: 211–235.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
