In this paper, we examine when members of underrepresented groups choose to support each other, using the context of the funding of female founders via donation-based crowdfunding. Building on theories of choice homophily, we develop the concept of activist choice homophily, in which the basis of attraction between two individuals is not merely similarity between them, but rather perceptions of shared structural barriers stemming from a common social identity based on group membership. We differentiate activist choice homophily from homophily based on the similarity between individuals (“interpersonal choice homophily”), as well as from “induced homophily,” which reflects the likelihood that those in a particular social category will affiliate and form networks. Using lab experiments and field data, we show that activist choice homophily provides an explanation for why women are more likely to succeed at crowdfunding than men and why women are most successful in industries in which they are least represented.
AgrawalA.CataliniC.GoldfarbA.2011“The geography of crowdfunding.” NBER Working Paper No. 16820.
2.
AhujaG.PolidoroF.Jr.MitchellW.2009“Structural homophily or social asymmetry? Tie formation of alliances by poorly embedded firms.” Strategic Management Journal, 30: 941–958.
3.
AignerD. J.CainG. G.1977“Statistical theories of discrimination in labor markets.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 30: 175–187.
4.
ArrowK. J.1972“Models of job discrimination.” In PascalA. H. (ed.), Racial Discrimination in Economic Life: 83–102. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
5.
ArrowK. J.1973“The theory of discrimination.” In AshenfelterO.ReesA. (eds.), Discrimination in Labor Markets: 3–33. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
AshfordB. E.MaelF.1989“Social identity theory and the organization.” Academy of Management Review, 14: 20–39.
7.
BaronJ. N.BielbyW. T.1980“Bringing the firm back in: Stratification, segmentation, and the organization of work.” American Sociological Review, 45: 737–765.
8.
BaronJ. N.HannanM. T.BurtonM. D.2001“Labor pains: Change in organizational models and employee turnover in young, high-tech firms.” American Journal of Sociology, 106: 960–1012.
9.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A.1986“The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51: 1173–1182.
10.
BatesT.2006“The urban development potential of black-owned businesses.” Journal of the American Planning Association, 72: 227–237.
11.
BeckerG. S.1959The Economics of Discrimination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
Becker-BleaseJ. R.SohlJ. E.2007“Do women-owned businesses have equal access to angel capital?” Journal of Business Venturing, 22: 503–521.
13.
BeckmanC. M.BurtonM. D.2008“Founding the future: The evolution of top management teams from founding to IPO.” Organization Science, 19: 3–24.
14.
BekkersR.2010“Who gives what and when? A scenario study of intentions to give time and money.” Social Science Research, 39: 369–381.
15.
BenzM.MeierS.2008“Do people behave in experiments as in the field? Evidence from donations.” Experimental Economics, 11: 268–281.
16.
BlauP.1977Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure. New York: Free Press.
17.
BrushC. G.de BruinA.WelterF.2009“A gender-aware framework for women’s entrepreneurship.” International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 1: 8–24.
18.
BurtonM. D.BeckmanC. M.2007“Leaving a legacy: Role imprints and successor turnover in young firms.” American Sociological Review, 72: 239–266.
19.
ButtnerE. H.RosenB.1989“Funding new business ventures: Are decision-makers biased against women entrepreneurs?” Journal of Business Venturing, 4: 249–261.
20.
Cain-MillerC.2010“Out of the loop in Silicon Valley.” New York Times (published onlineApril17).
21.
CentolaD.2011“An experimental study of homophily in the adoption of health behavior.” Science, 334.6060: 1269–1272.
22.
CentolaD.van de RijtA.2015“Choosing your network: Social preferences in an online health community.” Social Science and Medicine, 125: 19–31.
23.
CohenL. E.BroschakJ. P.HavemanH. A.1998“And then there were more? The effect of organizational sex composition on the hiring and promotion of managers.” American Sociological Review, 63: 711–727.
24.
CohenP. N.HuffmanM. L.2007“Working for the woman? Female managers and the gender wage gap.” American Sociological Review, 72: 681–704.
25.
CrosettoP.RegnerT.2014“Crowdfunding determinants of success and funding dynamics.” Jena Economic Research Papers: 2014–2035.
26.
DuguidM.LoydD. L.TolbertP. S.2012“The impact of categorical status, numeric representation and work group prestige on preference for demographically similar others: A value threat approach.” Organization Science, 23: 386–401.
27.
DuncanO. D.HallerA. O.PortesA.1968“Peer influences on aspirations: A reinterpretation.” American Journal of Sociology, 74: 119–137.
28.
ElyR. J.1994“The effects of organization demographics and social identity on relationships among professional women.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 203–238.
29.
FalkA.MeierS.ZehnderC.2013Do lab experiments misrepresent social preferences? The case of self-selected student samples.” Journal of the European Economic Association, 11: 839–852.
30.
FernandezR.GreenbergJ.2013“Race, network hiring and statistical discrimination.” In McDonaldS. (ed.), Research in the Sociology of Work, 24: 81–102. Bingley, UK: Emerald Insight.
31.
FernandezR.SuC.2004“Space in the study of labor markets.” Annual Review of Sociology, 30: 545–569.
32.
FestingerL.1957A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
33.
GiulianoL.LevineD. I.LeonardJ.2009“Manager race and the race of new hires.” Journal of Labor Economics, 27: 589–631.
34.
GoldinC.RouseC.2000“Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of ‘blind’ auditions on female musicians.” American Economic Review, 90: 715–751.
35.
GompersP.MukharlyamovV.XuanY.2012“The cost of friendship.” NBERWorking Paper No. 18141.
36.
GoodmanL.2002“How to analyze survey data pertaining to the time bind and how not to analyze such data.” Social Science Quarterly, 83: 926–940.
37.
GormanE. H.2005“Gender stereotypes, same-gender preferences, and organizational variation in the hiring of women: Evidence from law firms.” American Sociological Review, 70: 702–728.
38.
GreenbergJ.2014“What you value or what you know? Which mechanism explains the intergenerational transmission of business ownership expectations?” In GreveH. R.SeidelM.-D. (eds.), Research in the Sociology of Work, 25: 85–126. Bingley, UK: Emerald Insight.
39.
GreenbergJ.2015“Lifeblood or liability? The contingent value of co-founders in startups.” Working paper, NYU Stern School of Business.
40.
GreeneP.BrushC.HartM. M.SaparitoP.2001“Patterns of venture capital funding: Is gender a factor?” Venture Capital: An Introduction, 3 (1): 41–62.
41.
GreeneP.HartM.2003 “Women entrepreneurs: Moving front and center: An overview of research and theory.”USASBE.org White Paper.
42.
HarrisonR.MasonC.2007“Does gender matter? Women business angels and the supply of entrepreneurial finance.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31: 445–472.
43.
HegdeD.TumlinsonK.2014“Does social proximity enhance business partnerships? Theory and evidence from ethnicity’s role in US venture capital.” Management Science, 60: 2355–2380.
44.
HeilmanM. E.2012“Gender stereotypes and workplace bias.” In BriefA. P.StawB. M. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 32: 113–135. New York: Elsevier/JAI.
45.
HoggM. A.TerryD. J.2000“Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts.” Academy of Management Review, 25: 121–140.
HustonT. L.LevingerG.1978“Interpersonal attraction and relationships.” Annual Review of Psychology, 29: 115–156.
48.
IacusS. M.KingG.PorroG.2012“Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching.” Political Analysis, 20: 1–24.
49.
IbarraH.1992“Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 37: 422–447.
50.
IngramP.MorrisM. W.2007“Do people mix at mixers? Structure, homophily, and the ‘life of the party.’” Administrative Science Quarterly, 52: 558–585.
51.
JettenJ.SchmittM. T.BranscombeN. E.GarzaA. A.MewseA. J.2011“Group commitment in the face of discrimination: The role of legitimacy appraisals.” European Journal of Social Psychology, 41: 116–126.
52.
KandelD. B.1966“Status homophily, social context, and participation in psychotherapy.” American Journal of Sociology, 71: 640–650.
53.
KanterR. M.1977Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.
54.
KatzE.LazarsfeldP. F.1955Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications. New York: Free Press.
55.
KleinbaumA.StuartT. E.TushmanM. L.2013“Discretion within constraint: Homophily and structure in a formal organization.” Organization Science, 24: 1316–1336.
56.
KossinetsG.WattsD. J.2009“Origins of homophily in an evolving social network.” American Journal of Sociology, 115: 405–450.
57.
LaumannE. O.1973Bonds of Pluralism: The Form and Substance of Urban Social Networks. New York: Wiley.
58.
LazarsfeldP. F.MertonR. K.1954“Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis.” In BergerM.AbelT.PageC. H. (eds.), Freedom and Control in Modern Society, 18: 18–66. New York: Van Nostrand.
59.
LinK.-H.LundquistJ. H.2013“Mate selection in cyberspace: The intersection of race, gender, and education.” American Journal of Sociology, 119: 183–215.
60.
LipsetS. M.TrowM.ColemanJ. S.1956Union Democracy: The Internal Politics of the International Typographical Union. New York: Free Press.
61.
LundqvistD.FlyktA.OhmanA.1998 “Karolinska directed emotional faces.” Database of Standardized Facial Images. Psychology Section, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinksa Hospital. S-171-76 Stockholm, Sweden.
62.
MacKinnonD. P.2008Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
MarlowS.2002“Women and self-employment: A part of or apart from theoretical construct?” International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 3 (2): 83–91.
66.
MaromD.RobbA.SadeO.2015 “Gender dynamics in crowdfunding (Kickstarter): Evidence on entrepreneurs, investors, deals and taste based discrimination.” SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2442954.
67.
MarsdenP. V.1988“Homogeneity in confiding relations.” Social Networks, 10: 57–76.
68.
MaumeD. J.2011“Meet the new boss . . . same as the old boss? Female supervisors and subordinate career prospects.” Social Science Research, 40: 287–298.
69.
McCallL.2005“The complexity of intersectionality.” American Journal of Sociology, 30: 1771–1800.
70.
McCroskeyJ. C.RichmondV. P.DalyJ. A.1975“The development of a measure of perceived homophily in interpersonal communication.” Human Communication Research, 2: 51–65.
71.
McCroskeyL. L.McCroskeyJ. C.RichmondV. P.2006“Analysis and improvement of the measurement of interpersonal attraction and homophily.” Communication Quarterly, 54: 1–31.
72.
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.CookJ. M.2001“Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks.” Annual Review of Sociology, 27: 415–444.
73.
MilkmanK. L.AkinolaM.ChughD.2012“Temporal distance and discrimination: An audit study in academia.” Psychological Science, 23: 710–717.
74.
MilkmanK. L.AkinolaM.ChughD.2014“Discrimination is not evenly distributed: A field experiment in academia.”Working paper, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.
75.
MollickE.2014“The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study.” Journal of Business Venturing, 29: 1–16.
76.
MollickE.2016“Containing multitudes: The many impacts of Kickstarter funding.”Working paper, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.
77.
MollickE.NandaR.2016“Wisdom or madness? Comparing crowds with expert evaluation in funding the arts.” Management Science, 62: 1533–1553.
MühlenbruchB.JochimsenM. A.2013“Research policy: Only wholesale reform will bring equality.” Nature, 495: 40–42.
80.
NosekB. A.BanajiM. R.GreenwaldA. G.2002“Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site.” Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6: 101–115.
81.
OosterhofN. N.TodorovA.2008“The functional basis of face evaluation.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA: 11087–11092.
82.
PapkeL. W.WooldridgeJ. L.1996“Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(K) plan participant rates.” Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11: 619–632.
83.
PowellW. W.WhiteD. R.KoputK. W.Owen-SmithJ.2005“Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences.” American Journal of Sociology, 110: 1132–1205.
84.
ReagansR.2005“Preferences, identity, and competition: Predicting tie strength from demographic data.” Management Science, 51: 1374–1383.
85.
RidgewayC.1997“Interaction and the conservation of gender inequality: Considering employment.” American Sociological Review, 62: 218–235.
86.
RidgewayC.2011Framed by Gender: How Gender Inequality Persists in the Modern World. New York: Oxford University Press.
87.
RosenkopfL.PadulaG.2008“Investigating the microstructure of network evolution: Alliance formation in the mobile communications industry.” Organization Science, 19: 669–687.
88.
RuefM.AldrichH. E.CarterN. M.2003“The structure of founding teams: Homophily, strong ties, and isolation among U.S. entrepreneurs.” American Sociological Review, 68: 195–222.
89.
SchmittM. T.EllemersN.BranscombeN. R.2003“Perceiving and responding to gender discrimination in organizations.” In HaslamS. A.van KnippenbergD.PlatowM. J.EllemersN. (eds.), Social Identity at Work: Developing Theory for Organizational Practice: 277–292.Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
ShawE.CarterS.LamW.2010“An integrated view of gender, finance, and entrepreneurial capital: Theory, practice, and policy.” In BrushC. G.de BruinA.GatewoodE. J.HenryC. (eds.), Women Entrepreneurs and the Global Environment for Growth: 187–205. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
93.
ShrumW.CheekN. H.Jr.HunterS. M.1988“Friendship in school: Gender and racial homophily.” Sociology of Education, 61: 227–239.
94.
SmithS. S.2005“Don’t put my name on it: Social capital activation and job-finding assistance among the black urban poor.” American Journal of Sociology, 111: 1–57.
95.
SrivastavaS. B.ShermanE. L.2015“Agents of change or cogs in the machine? Reexamining the influence of female managers on the gender wage gap.” American Journal of Sociology, 120: 1778–1808.
96.
StollM. A.RaphaelS.HolzerH. J.2004“Black job applicants and the hiring officer’s race.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 57: 267–287.
97.
StrykerS.OwensT. J.WhiteR. W. (eds.) 2000Self, Identity, and Social Movements, vol. 13. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
98.
StuartT.SorensonO.2007“Strategic networks and entrepreneurial ventures.” Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1: 211–227.
99.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C.1979“An integrative theory of intergroup conflict.” In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (eds.), Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations: 33–47. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
100.
ThébaudS.2015“Business as Plan B: Institutional foundations of gender inequality in entrepreneurship across 24 industrialized countries.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 60: 671–711.
101.
TillyC.1999Durable Inequality. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
102.
TurcoC. J.2010“Cultural foundations of tokenism: Evidence from the leveraged buyout industry.” American Sociological Review, 75: 894–913.
103.
TurnerJ. C.HoggM. A.OakesP. J.ReicherS. D.WetherellM. S.1987Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-categorization Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
104.
VerbruggeL. M.1977“The structure of adult friendship choices.” Social Forces, 56: 576–597.
105.
WeareC.MussoJ.JunK. N.2009“Cross-talk: The role of homophily and elite bias in civic associations.” Social Forces, 88: 147–173.
106.
WhiteM. J.KruczeckT. A.BrownM. T.WhiteG. B.1989“Occupational sex stereotypes among college students.” Journal of Vocational Behavior, 34: 289–298.
107.
WhittingtonK. B.Smith-DoerrL.2008“Women inventors in context: Disparities in patenting across academia and industry.” Gender and Society, 22: 194–218.
108.
WilliamsJ. C.2000Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict. New York: Oxford University Press.
109.
WimmerA.LewisK.2010“Beyond and below racial homophily: ERG models of a friendship network documented on Facebook.” American Journal of Sociology, 116: 583–642.
110.
YounkinP.KashkooliK.2013 “A crowd or a community?” Paper presented at the Berkeley Fung Institute Symposium on Crowdfunding, Berkeley, CA.
111.
ZengZ.XieY.2008“A preference–opportunity–choice framework with applications to intergroup friendship.” American Journal of Sociology, 114: 615–648.
