We report the results of an ethnographic study of a natural food cooperative in which we found an inherent tension in its mission between idealism and pragmatism, and we explore the dynamics through which that tension was managed and engaged in day-to-day governance and activities. Insights from participant observation, archival data, semi-structured interviews, and surveys provide a detailed and holistic account of the intergroup and intragroup processes through which the co-op negotiated its dualistic nature, as embodied in its hybrid organizational identity. The findings suggest that the value of each side of the duality was recognized at both the individual and organizational levels. Members’ discomfort with the duality, however, led them to split the mission in two and identify with one part, while projecting their less-favored part on others, creating an identity foil (an antithesis). This splitting resulted in ingroups and outgroups and heated intergroup conflict over realizing cooperative ideals vs. running a viable business. Ingroup members favoring one part of the mission nonetheless identified with the outgroup favoring the other because it embodied a side of themselves they continued to value. Individuals who exemplified their ingroup’s most extreme attributes were seen by the outgroup as prototypical, thus serving as “lightning rods” for intergroup conflict; this dynamic paradoxically enabled other ingroup members to work more effectively with moderate members of the outgroup. The idealist–pragmatist duality was kept continually in play over time through oscillating decisions and actions that shifted power from one group to the other, coupled with ongoing rituals to repair and maintain relationships disrupted by the messiness of the process. Thus ostensible dysfunctionality at the group level fostered functionality at the organizational level.
AlbertS.WhettenD. A.1985 “Organizational identity.” In CummingsL. L.StawB. M. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 7: 263–295. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
2.
ArnouldE. J.WallendorfM.1994 “Market-oriented ethnography: Interpretation building and marketing strategy formulation.” Journal of Marketing Research, 31: 484–504.
3.
AshcraftK. L.TretheweyA.2004 “Developing tension: An agenda for applied research on the organization of irrationality.” Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32: 171–181.
4.
AshforthB. E.MaelF. A.1996 “Organizational identity and strategy as a context for the individual.” In BaumJ. A. C.DuttonJ. E. (eds.), Advances in Strategic Management, 13: 19–64. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
5.
AshforthB. E.PrattM. G.2003 “Institutionalized spirituality: An oxymoron?” In GiacaloneR. A.JurkiewiczC. L. (eds.), The Handbook of Workplace Spirituality and Organizational Performance: 93–107. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
AshforthB. E.RogersK. M.PrattM. G.PradiesC.2014 “Ambivalence in organizations: A multilevel approach.” Organization Science, in press.
8.
BargeJ. K.LeeM.MadduxK.NabringR.TownsendB.2008 “Managing dualities in planned change initiatives.” Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36: 364–390.
9.
BatesonG.1935 “Culture contact and schismogenesis.” Man, 35: 178–183.
10.
BattilanaJ.DoradoS.2010 “Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations.” Academy of Management Journal, 53: 1419–1440.
11.
BeckA. T.ClarkD. A.1997 “An information processing model of anxiety: Automatic and strategic processes.” Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35: 49–58.
12.
BierlyP. E.IIIKesslerE. H.ChristensenE. W.2000 “Organizational learning, knowledge and wisdom.” Journal of Organizational Change Management, 13: 595–618.
13.
BurmeisterP.2000 “ConImp—Ein Programm zur formalen Begriffsanalyse.” In Stumme undG.WilleR. (eds.), Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung: Methoden und Anwendungen: 25–56. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. [“ConImp—A program for formal concept analysis.” In StummeG.WilleR. (eds.), Concept Analysis: Methods and Applications: 25–56. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.]
14.
CameronK. S.1986 “Effectiveness as paradox: Consensus and conflict in conceptions of organizational effectiveness.” Management Science, 32: 539–553.
15.
CameronK. S.QuinnR. E.1988 “Organizational paradox and transformation.” In QuinnR. E.CameronK. S. (eds.), Paradox and Transformation: Toward a Theory of Change in Organization and Management: 1–18. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
CharmazK.2006Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage.
18.
CleggS. R.da CunhaJ. V.e CunhaM. P.2002 “Management paradoxes: A relational view.” Human Relations, 55: 483–503.
19.
ConoverM.1959 “The Rochdale principles in American co-operative associations.” Western Political Quarterly, 12: 111–122.
20.
da CunhaJ. V.CleggS. R.e CunhaM. P.2002 “Management, paradox, and permanent dialectics.” In CleggS. R. (ed.), Management and Organization Paradoxes: 11–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
21.
de RondM.BouchikhiH.2004 “On the dialectics of strategic alliances.” Organization Science, 15: 56–69.
22.
EffronD. A.MillerD. T.2012 “How the moralization of issues grants social legitimacy to act on one’s attitudes.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38: 690–701.
23.
EisenhardtK. M.2000 “Paradox, spirals, ambivalence: The new language of change and pluralism.” Academy of Management Review, 25: 703–705.
24.
El-SawadA.ArnoldJ.CohenL.2004 “‘Doublethink’: The prevalence and function of contradiction in accounts of organizational life.” Human Relations, 57: 1179–1203.
25.
EtzioniA.1975A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations: On Power, Involvement, and Their Correlations, rev. ed. New York: Free Press.
26.
EvansP. A. L.1999 “HRM on the edge: A duality perspective.” Organization, 6: 325–338.
27.
EvansP. A. L.DozY.1992 “Dualities: A paradigm for human resource and organizational development in complex multinationals.” In PucikV.TichyN. M.BarnettC. K. (eds.), Globalizing Management: Creating and Leading the Competitive Organization: 85–106. New York: Wiley.
28.
EvansP.PucikV.BarsouxJ.-L.2002The Global Challenge: International Human Resource Management. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
29.
FarjounM.2010 “Beyond dualism: Stability and change as a duality.” Academy of Management Review, 35: 202–225.
30.
FiolC. M.PrattM. G.O’ConnorE. J.2009 “Managing intractable identity conflicts.” Academy of Management Review, 34: 32–55.
31.
FordJ. D.BackoffR. W.1988 “Organizational change in and out of dualities and paradox.” In QuinnR. E.CameronK. S. (eds.), Paradox and Transformation: Toward a Theory of Change in Organization and Management: 81–121. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
32.
FreemanL. C.1996 “Cliques, Galois lattices, and the structure of human social groups.” Social Networks, 18: 173–187.
33.
GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F.2000Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Common Ingroup Identity Model. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
34.
GharajedaghiJ.1982 “Social dynamics (dichotomy or dialectic).” General Systems, 27: 251–268.
35.
GiddensA.1984The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
36.
GilbertC. G.2006 “Change in the presence of residual fit: Can competing frames coexist?” Organization Science, 17: 150–167.
37.
GioiaD. A.CorleyK. G.2002 “Being good versus looking good: Business school rankings and the Circean transformation from substance to image.” Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1: 107–120.
38.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L.1967The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.
39.
GlynnM. A.2000 “When cymbals become symbols: Conflict over organizational identity within a symphony orchestra.” Organization Science, 11: 285–298.
40.
GotsiM.AndriopoulosC.LewisM. W.IngramA. E.2010 “Managing creatives: Paradoxical approaches to identity regulation.” Human Relations, 63: 781–805.
41.
GraetzF.SmithA. C. T.2008 “The role of dualities in arbitrating continuity and change in forms of organizing.” International Journal of Management Reviews, 10: 265–280.
42.
HandyC.1994The Age of Paradox. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
43.
HarrisonS. H.AshforthB. E.CorleyK. G.2009 “Organizational sacralization and sacrilege.” In StawB. M.BriefA. P. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 29: 225–254. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
44.
HaslamS. A.OakesP. J.McGartyC.TurnerJ. C.OnoratoR. S.1995 “Contextual changes in the prototypicality of extreme and moderate outgroup members.” European Journal of Social Psychology, 25: 509–530.
45.
HedbergB. L. T.NystromP. C.StarbuckW. H.1976 “Camping on seesaws: Prescriptions for a self-designing organization.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 21: 41–65.
46.
HoggM. A.HardieE. A.1991 “Social attraction, personal attraction, and self-categorization: A field study.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17: 175–180.
47.
IslamG.ZyphurM. J.2009 “Rituals in organizations: A review and expansion of current theory.” Group and Organization Management, 34: 114–139.
48.
JayJ.2013 “Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations.” Academy of Management Journal, 56: 137–159.
49.
JehnK. A.BezrukovaK.2010 “The faultline activation process and the effects of activated faultlines on coalition formation, conflict, and group outcomes.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 112: 24–42.
50.
JohanssonU.WoodillaJ. (eds.) 2005Irony and Organizations: Epistemological Claims and Supporting Field Stories. Liber, Sweden: Copenhagen Business School Press.
51.
JohnstonS.SelskyJ. W.2006 “Duality and paradox: Trust and duplicity in Japanese business practices.” Organization Studies, 27: 183–205.
52.
KleinM.1975 “Notes on some schizoid mechanisms (1946).” In KleinM., The Writings of Melanie Klein, vol. 3: Envy and Gratitude and Other Works 1946-1963: 1–24. New York: Free Press.
53.
KohguchiH.SakataK.FujimotoK.2007 “The effects of leadership and prototypicality on group members’ morale and leader perception.” Japanese Journal of Social Psychology, 22: 245–257.
54.
KraatzM. S.BlockE. S.2008 “Organizational implications of institutional pluralism.” In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SuddabyR.SahlinK. (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism: 243–275. Los Angeles: Sage.
55.
LangleyA.1999 “Strategies for theorizing from process data.” Academy of Management Review, 24: 691–710.
MertonR. K.1976Sociological Ambivalence and Other Essays. New York: Free Press.
65.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.1994Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, 2d ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
66.
MintzbergH.1983Power In and Around Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
67.
MurnighanJ. K.ConlonD. E.1991 “The dynamics of intense work groups: A study of British string quartets.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 165–186.
68.
NewmanL. S.CaldwellT. L.2005 “Allport’s ‘living inkblots’: The role of defensive projection in stereotyping and prejudice.” In DovidioJ. F.GlickP.RudmanL. A. (eds.), On the Nature of Prejudice: Fifty Years after Allport: 377–392. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
69.
PacanowskyM. E.O’Donnell-TrujilloN.1983 “Organizational communication as cultural performance.” Communication Monographs, 50: 126–147.
70.
PacheA.-C.SantosF.2010 “When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands.” Academy of Management Review, 35: 455–476.
71.
PaineL. S.2003Value Shift: Why Companies Must Merge Social and Financial Imperatives to Achieve Superior Performance. New York: McGraw-Hill.
72.
PalmerI.DunfordR.2002 “Managing discursive tension: The co-existence of individualist and collaborative discourses in Flight Centre.” Journal of Management Studies, 39: 1045–1069.
73.
PetriglieriG.SteinM.2012 “The unwanted self: Projective identification in leaders’ identity work.” Organization Studies, 33: 1217–1235.
74.
PooleM. S.Van de VenA. H.1989 “Using paradox to build management and organization theories.” Academy of Management Review, 14: 562–578.
75.
PotterS. J.2001 “A longitudinal analysis of the distinction between for-profit and not-for-profit hospitals in America.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 42: 17–44.
76.
PrattM. G.AshforthB. E.2003 “Fostering meaningfulness in working and at work.” In CameronK. S.DuttonJ. E.QuinnR. E. (eds.), Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline: 309–327. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
77.
PrattM. G.ForemanP. O.2000 “Classifying managerial responses to multiple organizational identities.” Academy of Management Review, 25: 18–42.
78.
RaischS.BirkinshawJ.2008 “Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators.” Journal of Management, 34: 375–409.
79.
ReagleJ.2010Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
80.
RenH.GrayB.2009 “Repairing relationship conflict: How violation types and culture influence the effectiveness of restoration rituals.” Academy of Management Review, 34: 105–126.
81.
RothschildJ.WhittJ. A.1986The Cooperative Workplace: Potentials and Dilemmas of Organizational Democracy and Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
82.
Sánchez-RundeC. J.PettigrewA. M.2003 “Managing dualities.” In PettigrewA. M.WhittingtonR.MelinL.Sánchez-RundeC.van den BoschF. A. J.RuigrokW.NumagamiT. (eds.), Innovative Forms of Organizing: International Perspectives: 243–250. London: Sage.
83.
SchwartzS. H.BardiA.2001 “Value hierarchies across cultures: Taking a similarities perspective.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32: 268–290.
84.
SeoM.-G.PutnamL. L.BartunekJ. M.2004 “Dualities and tensions of planned organizational change.” In PooleM. S.VanA. H.Vende (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Change and Innovation: 73–107. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
85.
ShoreK.1998 “Managed care and managed competition: A question of morality.” In SmallR. F.BarnhillL. R. (eds.), Practicing in the New Mental Health Marketplace: Ethical, Legal, and Moral Issues: 67–102. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
86.
SmithA.GraetzF.2006 “Organizing dualities and strategizing for change.” Strategic Change, 15: 231–239.
87.
SmithK. K.BergD. N.1987Paradoxes of Group Life: Understanding Conflict, Paralysis, and Movement in Group Dynamics. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
88.
SmithW. K.LewisM. W.2011 “Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing.” Academy of Management Review, 36: 381–403.
89.
TracyS. J.2004 “Dialectic, contradiction, or double bind? Analyzing and theorizing employee reactions to organizational tension.” Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32: 119–146.
90.
Van VugtM.2012 “The male warrior hypothesis: The evolutionary psychology of intergroup conflict, tribal aggression, and warfare.” In ShackelfordT. K.Weekes-ShackelfordV. A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Perspectives on Violence, Homicide, and War: 291–300. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
91.
WeberJ. M.MessickD. M.2006 “Improving managerial decision making: Lessons from experimental social dilemma research.” In Van LangeP. A. M. (ed.), Bridging Social Psychology: Benefits of Transdisciplinary Approaches: 359–364. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
92.
WestenholzA.1993 “Paradoxical thinking and change in the frames of reference.” Organization Studies, 14: 37–58.
93.
WrightJ. C.CullumJ.SchwabN.2008 “The cognitive and affective dimensions of moral conviction: Implications for attitudinal and behavioral measures of interpersonal tolerance.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34: 1461–1476.
