Using comprehensive data from the global advertising industry from 1995 to 2003, we examined the effects of indirect ties (common clients) on acquirers’ choices of partners for mergers and acquisitions and on the performance of the combined organizations. We found that the probability of being acquired rose but the performance of merged entities declined—both by losing clients and by selling less to the clients retained—with the number of common clients connecting the target to the acquirer. Two potential mechanisms could account for this pattern of results: either managers hold positively biased beliefs about those connected to them through common clients, or they restrict their searches for potential acquisition partners to those they already know, despite the disadvantages of doing so, ignoring targets that may have more potential but with whom they have no indirect ties.
AgrawalA.JaffeJ. F.2000 “The post-merger performance puzzle.” In CooperC.GregoryA. (eds.), Advances in Mergers and Acquisitions, 1: 7–41. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
2.
AgrawalA.JaffeJ. F.MandelkerG. N.1992 “The post-merger performance of acquiring firms: A re-examination of an anomaly.” Journal of Finance, 47: 1605–1621.
3.
AshenfelterO.CardD.1985 “Using the longitudinal structure of earnings to estimate the effect of training programs.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 67: 648–660.
4.
BakerW. E.FaulknerR. R.FisherG. A.1998 “Hazards of the market: The continuity and dissolution of interorganizational market relationships.” American Sociological Review, 63: 147–177.
5.
BarnettW. P.SorensonO.2002 “The Red Queen in organizational creation and development.” Industrial and Corporate Change, 11: 289–325.
6.
BaumJ. A. C.LiS. X.UsherJ. M.2000 “Making the next move: How experiential and vicarious learning shape the locations of chains’ acquisitions.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 766–801.
7.
BertrandM.DufloE.MullainathanS.2004 “How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates?” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119: 249–275.
8.
BlauP. M.1964Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley.
9.
BlissR. T.RosenR. J.2001 “CEO compensation and back mergers.” Journal of Financial Economics, 61: 107–138.
10.
BradleyM.DesaiA.KimE. H.1988 “Synergistic gains from corporate acquisitions and their division between the stockholders of target and acquiring firms.” Journal of Financial Economics, 21: 3–40.
11.
BriscoeF.TsaiW.2011 “Overcoming relational inertia: How organizational members respond to acquisition events in a law firm.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 56: 408–440.
12.
BurtR. S.KnezM.1995 “Kinds of third-party effects on trust.” Rationality and Society, 7: 255–292.
13.
ButlerA. W.CornaggiaJ.2011 “Does access to external finance improve productivity? Evidence from a natural experiment.” Journal of Financial Economics, 99: 184–203.
14.
CameronA. C.TrivediP. K.1998Regression Analysis of Count Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
CapronL.DussaugeP.MitchellW.1998 “Resource redeployment following horizontal acquisitions in Europe and North America, 1988-1992.” Strategic Management Journal, 19: 631–661.
16.
CapronL.HullandJ.1999 “Redeployment of brands: sales forces, and general marketing management expertise following horizontal acquisitions: A resource-based view.” Journal of Marketing, 63 (2): 41–54.
17.
CapronL.ShenJ.-C.2007 “Acquisitions of private vs. public firms: Private information, target selection and acquirer returns.” Strategic Management Journal, 28: 891–911.
18.
CasciaroT.LoboM. S.2008 “When competence is irrelevant: The role of interpersonal affect in task-related ties.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 53: 655–684.
19.
ChatterjeeS.1986 “Types of synergy and economic value: The impact of acquisitions on merging and rival firms.” Strategic Management Journal, 7: 119–139.
20.
DavisG. F.1991 “Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 583–613.
21.
DekkerD.KrackhardtD.SnijdersT. A. B.2007 “Sensitivity of MRQAP tests to collinearity and autocorrelation conditions.” Psychometrika, 72: 563–581.
22.
DiPreteT. A.2011 “Segregation in social networks based on acquaintanceship and trust.” American Journal of Sociology, 116: 1234–1283.
23.
FeldS. L.1981 “The focused organization of social ties.” American Journal of Sociology, 86: 1015–1035.
24.
GranovetterM.1985 “Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology, 91: 481–510.
25.
GreifA.1993 “Contract enforceability and economic institutions in early trade: The Maghribi traders’ coalition.” American Economic Review, 83: 525–548.
26.
GrinsteinY.HribarP.2004 “CEO compensation and incentives: Evidence from M&A bonuses.” Journal of Financial Economics, 73: 119–143.
27.
GruberJ.1994 “The incidence of mandated maternity benefits.” American Economic Review, 84: 622–641.
28.
GulatiR.GargiuloM.1999 “Where do interorganizational networks come from?” American Journal of Sociology, 104: 1439–1993.
29.
GulatiR.LavieD.SinghH.2009 “The nature of partnering experience and the gains from alliances.” Strategic Management Journal, 30: 1213–1233.
30.
GulatiR.SytchM.2007 “Dependence asymmetry and joint dependence in interorganizational relationships: Effects of embeddedness on a manufacturer’s performance in procurement relationships.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 52: 32–69.
31.
HaleblianJ.DeversC. E.McNamaraG.CarpenterM. A.DavisonR. B.2009 “Taking stock of what we know about mergers and acquisitions: A review and research agenda.” Journal of Management, 35: 469–502.
32.
HansenR. G.1987 “A theory for the choice of exchange medium in mergers and acquisitions.” Journal of Business, 60 (1): 75–95.
33.
HaunschildP. R.1994 “How much is that company worth? Interorganizational relationships, uncertainty, and acquisition premiums.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 391–411.
34.
HaywardM. L. A.HambrickD. C.1997 “Explaining the premiums paid for large acquisitions: Evidence of CEO hubris.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 103–127.
35.
HoetkerG.2005 “How much you know versus how well I know you: Selecting a supplier for a technically innovative component.” Strategic Management Journal, 26: 75–96.
36.
HoetkerG.2007 “The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues.” Strategic Management Journal, 28: 331–343.
37.
IacusS. M.KingG.PorroG.2012 “Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching.” Political Analysis, 20 (1): 1–24.
38.
KaplanS.WeisbachM. S.1992 “The success of acquisitions: Evidence from divestitures.” Journal of Finance, 47: 107–138.
39.
KimJ.-Y.FinkelsteinS.2009 “The effects of strategic and market complementarity on acquisition performance: Evidence from the U.S. commercial banking industry, 1989-2001.” Strategic Management Journal, 30: 617–646.
40.
KogutB.WalkerG.2001 “The small world of Germany and the durability of national networks.” American Sociological Review, 66: 317–335.
41.
KollockP.1994 “The emergence of exchange structures: An experimental study of uncertainty, commitment and trust.” American Journal of Sociology, 100: 313–345.
42.
LangetiegT. C.1978 “An application of a three-factor performance index to measure stockholder gains from merger.” Journal of Financial Economics, 6: 365–383.
43.
LarsonA.1992 “Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange relationships.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 37: 76–104.
44.
LeeJ.2013 “Dancing with the enemy? Relational hazards and the contingent value of repeat exchanges in M&A markets.” Organization Science, 24: 1237–1256.
MakriM.HittM. A.LaneP. J.2010 “Complementary technologies, knowledge relatedness and invention outcomes in high technology mergers and acquisitions.” Strategic Management Journal, 31: 602–628.
47.
MalmendierU.TateG.2008 “Who makes acquisitions? CEO overconfidence and the market’s reaction.” Journal of Financial Economics, 89: 20–43.
48.
MarchJ. G.1991 “Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning.” Organization Science, 2: 71–87.
49.
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.CookJ. M.2001 “Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks.” Annual Review of Sociology, 27: 415–444.
50.
MeulemanM.LockettA.ManigartS.WrightM.2010 “Partner selection decisions in interfirm collaborations: The paradox of relational embeddedness.” Journal of Management Studies, 47: 995–1019.
51.
MolmL. D.TakahashiN.PetersonG.2000 “Risk and trust in social exchange: An experimental test of a classical proposition.” American Journal of Sociology, 105: 1396–1427.
PorriniD.2004 “Can a previous alliance between an acquirer and a target affect acquisition performance?” Journal of Management, 30: 545–562.
54.
PowellW. W.KoputK. W.WhiteD. R.Owen-SmithJ.2005 “Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences.” American Journal of Sociology, 110: 1132–1205.
55.
RagozzinoR.ReuerJ. J.2011 “Geographic distance and corporate acquisitions: Signals from IPO firms.” Strategic Management Journal, 32: 876–894.
56.
RaubW.WeesieJ.1990 “Reputation and efficiency in social interactions: An example of network effects.” American Journal of Sociology, 96: 626–654.
57.
Rhodes-KropfM.RobinsonD. T.2008 “The market for mergers and the boundaries of the firm.” Journal of Finance, 58: 1169–1211.
58.
RoganM.2014 “Too close for comfort? The effect of embeddedness and competitive overlap on client relationship retention following an acquisition.” Organization Science, 25: 185–203.
59.
RoganM.GreveH. R.2014 “Resource dependence dynamics: Partner reactions to mergers.” Organization Science (forthcoming). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2388905.
60.
RollR.1986 “The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers.” Journal of Business, 59 (2): 197–216.
61.
RowleyT. J.BehrensD.KrackhardtD.2000 “Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries.” Strategic Management Journal, 21: 369–386.
62.
SavorP. G.LuQ.2009 “So stock mergers create value for acquirers?” Journal of Finance, 64: 1061–1097.
SorensonO.StuartT. E.2001 “Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments.” American Journal of Sociology, 106: 1546–1588.
65.
SorensonO.StuartT. E.2008 “Bringing the context back in: Settings and the search for syndicate partners in venture capital investing.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 53: 266–294.
66.
SorensonO.WaguespackD. M.2006 “Social structure and exchange: Self-confirming dynamics in Hollywood.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 51: 560–589.
67.
StiglerG. J.1950 “Monopoly and oligopoly by merger.” American Economic Review, 40 (2): 23–34.
68.
StoufferS. A.1940 “Intervening opportunities: A theory relating mobility and distance.” American Sociological Review, 5: 845–867.
69.
StuartT.1998 “Producer network positions and propensities to collaborate: An investigation of strategic alliance formations in a high-technology industry.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 43: 668–698.
70.
TiedensL. Z.LintonS.2001 “Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: The effects of specific emotions on information processing.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81: 973–988.
71.
UzziB.1997 “Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 35–67.
72.
UzziB.1999 “Embeddedness in the making of financial capital: How social relations and networks benefit firms seeking financing.” American Sociological Review, 64: 481–505.
73.
UzziB.LancasterR.2004 “Embeddedness and price formation in the corporate law market.” American Sociological Review, 69: 319–344.
74.
von NordenflychtA.2011 “Firm size and industry structure under human capital intensity: Insights from the evolution of the global advertising industry.” Organization Science, 22: 141–157.
75.
WalkerG.KogutB.ShanW.1997 “Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network.” Organization Science, 8: 109–125.
76.
WeberR. A.CamererC. F.2003 “Cultural conflict and merger failure: An experimental approach.” Management Science, 49: 400–415.
ZaheerA.HernandezE.BanerjeeS.2010 “Prior alliances with targets and acquisition performance in knowledge-intensive industries.” Organization Science, 21: 1072–1091.
79.
ZajoncR. B.1968 “Attitudinal effects of mere exposure.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monographs, 9: 1–27.
