Motivated by a growing literature in the social sciences suggesting that the transition to fatherhood has a profound effect on men’s values, we study how the wages of employees change after a male chief executive officer (CEO) has children, using comprehensive panel data on the employees, CEOs, and families of CEOs in all but the smallest Danish firms between 1996 and 2006. We find that (a) a male CEO generally pays his employees less generously after fathering a child, (b) the birth of a daughter has a less negative influence on wages than does the birth of a son and has a positive influence if the daughter is the CEO’s first, and (c) the wages of female employees are less adversely affected than are those of male employees and positively affected by the CEO’s first child of either gender. We also find that male CEOs pay themselves more after fathering a child, especially after fathering a son. These results are consistent with a desire by the CEO to husband more resources for his family after fathering a child and the psychological priming of the CEO’s generosity after the birth of his first daughter and specifically toward women after the birth of his first child of either gender.
AbowdJ. M.KramarzF.MargolisD. N.1999 “High wage workers and high wage firms.” Econometrica, 67: 251–333.
2.
AdamsR. B.FunkP.2011 “Beyond the glass ceiling: Does gender matter?” Management Science, forthcoming.
3.
AdamsR. B.LichtA. N.SagivL.2011 “Shareholders and stakeholders: How do directors decide?” Strategic Management Journal, 32: 1331–1355.
4.
AgleB. R.MitchellR. K.SonnenfeldJ. A.1999 “Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attribute and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values.” Academy of Management Journal, 42: 507–525.
5.
AkerlofG. A.KrantonR. E.2000 “Economics and identity.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115: 715–753.
6.
AlbækK.SørensenB. E.1998 “Worker flows and job flows in Danish manufacturing.” Economic Journal, 108: 1750–1771.
7.
AndersenS. M.ChenS.2002 “The relational self: An interpersonal social-cognitive theory.” Psychological Review, 109: 619–645.
8.
AndersenS. M.GlassmanN. S.1996 “Responding to significant others when they are not there: Effects on interpersonal inference, motivation, and affect.” In SorrentinoR.HigginsE.T. (eds.), Handbook of Motivation and Cognition, 3: 272–331. New York: Guilford Press.
9.
BachrachC.HindinM. J.ThomsonE.2000 “The changing shape of ties that bind: An overview and synthesis.” In WaiteL. J. (ed.), The Ties That Bind: Perspectives on Marriage and Cohabitation: 3–16. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
10.
BarnardC. I.1938The Functions of the Executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
BastosP.MonteiroN. P.2011 “Managers and wage policies.” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 20: 957–984.
12.
BennedsenM.NielsenK. M.Peréz-GonzalézF.WolfenzonD.2007 “Inside the family firm: The role of families in succession decisions and performance.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122: 647–691.
13.
BernardJ.1974The Future of Motherhood. New York: Penguin Books.
14.
BertrandM.SchoarA.2003 “Managing with Style: The Effect of Managers on Firm Policies.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118: 1169–1208.
15.
BeutelA. H.MariniM. M.1995 “Gender and values.” American Sociological Review, 60: 436–448.
16.
BlockJ. H.1983 “Differential premises arising from differential socialization of the sexes: Some conjectures.” Child Development, 54: 1335–1354.
17.
BoltonG. E.OckenfelsA.2000 “ERC—A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition.” American Economic Review, 90: 166–193.
18.
CardosoA. R.Winter-EbmerR.2010 “Female-led firms and gender wage policies.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 64: 143–163.
19.
CarpenterM. A.GeletkanyczM. A.SandersW. G.2004 “Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition.” Journal of Management, 30: 749–778.
20.
CharnessG.RabinM.2002 “Understanding social preferences with simple tests.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117: 817–869.
21.
ChatterjeeA.HambrickD. C.2007 “It’s all about me: Narcissistic CEOs and their effect on company strategy and performance.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 52: 351–386.
22.
ChenY.LiS. X.2009 “Group identity and social preferences.” American Economic Review, 99: 431–457.
23.
ChristiansenS. L.PalkovitzR.2001 “Why the ‘good provider’ role still matters: Providing as a form of paternal involvement.” Journal of Family Issues, 22: 84–106.
24.
CoontzS.1997The Way We Really Are: Coming to Terms with America’s Changing Families. New York: Basic Books.
25.
CowanC. P.CowanP. A.1992When Partners Become Parents: The Big Life Change for Couples. New York: Basic Books.
EnglandG. W.1967 “Personal value systems of American managers.” Academy of Management Journal, 10: 53–68.
28.
EriksonE. H.1964Insight and Responsibility: Lectures on the Ethical Implications of Psychoanalytic Insight. New York: W. W. Norton.
29.
EriksonE. H.1968Identity, Youth, and Crisis. New York: W. W. Norton.
30.
FehrE.SchmidtK. M.1999 “A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114: 817–868.
31.
FeldmanS. S.1987 “Predicting strain in mothers and fathers of 6-month-old infants: A short-term longitudinal study.” In BermanP. W.PedersenF. A. (eds.), Men’s Transition to Parenthood: 13–35. Longitudinal Studies of Early Family Experience.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32.
FinkelsteinS.HambrickD. C.CannellaA. A.Jr.2009Strategic Leadership: Theory and Research on Executives, Top Management Teams, and Boards. New York: Oxford University Press.
33.
GeorgeL. K.1980Role Transitions in Later Life. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
34.
GothA. F.2007 “Status report on the work-life balance in Denmark.” Trans. by A. Bell. KVINFO, October9. http://www.kvinfo.dk/side/674/article/67/. Accessed September 9, 2012.
35.
GrayJ. S.VanderhartM. J.2000 “Understanding the distribution of housework between husbands and wives.” In WaiteL. J. (ed.), The Ties That Bind: Perspectives on Marriage and Cohabitation: 356–367. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
36.
GrossmanF. K.1987 “Separate and together: Men’s autonomy and affiliation in the transition to parenthood.” In BermanP. W.PedersenF. A. (eds.), Men’s Transition to Parenthood: Longitudinal Studies of Early Family Experience: 89–112. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37.
HambrickD. C.2007 “The field of management’s devotion to theory: Too much of a good thing?” Academy of Management Journal, 50: 1346–1352.
38.
HambrickD. C.BrandonG. L.1988 “Executive values.” In HambrickD. C. (ed.), Executive Effectiveness—Concepts and Methods for Studying Top Managers: 3–34. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
39.
HambrickD. C.MasonP. A.1984 “Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers.” Academy of Management Journal, 9: 193–206.
40.
HaywardM. L. A.HambrickD. C.1997 “Explaining the premiums paid for large acquisitions: Evidence of CEO hubris.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 103–127.
41.
HelfatC. E.2007 “Stylized facts, empirical research and theory development in management.” Strategic Organization, 5: 185–192.
42.
HelfatC. E.HarrisD.WolfsonP. J.2006 “Women and men in the top executive ranks of U.S. corporations.” Academy of Management Perspectives, 20 (4): 42–64.
43.
HofstedeG.1980Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
44.
HolmesT. H.RaheR. H.1967 “The social readjustment rating scale.” Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 11: 213–218.
45.
LaRossaR.LaRossaM. M.1981Transition to Parenthood: How Infants Change Families. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
46.
LevineD. I.1993 “Fairness, markets, and ability to pay: Evidence from compensation executives.” American Economic Review, 83: 1241–1259.
47.
LevittS. D.ListJ. A.2007 “What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world?” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21: 153–174.
48.
MalmendierU.TateG.2005 “CEO overconfidence and corporate investment.” Journal of Finance, 60: 2661–2700.
49.
MalmendierU.TateG.2008 “Who makes acquisitions? CEO overconfidence and the market’s reaction.” Journal of Financial Economics, 89: 20–53.
50.
MeierS.2007 “A survey of economic theories and field evidence on pro-social behavior.” In FreyB. S.StutzerA. (eds.), Economics and Psychology: A Promising New Cross-disciplinary Field: 51–88. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
51.
MillerD.2007 “Paradigm prison, or in praise of atheoretical research.” Strategic Organization, 5: 177–184.
52.
MitchellR. K.AgleB. R.WoodD. J.1997 “Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts.” Academy of Management Review, 22: 853–886.
53.
OswaldA. J.PowdthaveeN.2010 “Daughters and left-wing voting.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 92: 213–227.
54.
OxleyJ. E.RivkinJ. W.RyallM. D., and the Strategy Research Initiative2010 “The strategy research initiative: Recognizing and encouraging high quality research in strategy.” Strategic Organization, 8: 377–386.
55.
PalkovitzR.2002Involved Fathering and Men’s Adult Development: Provisional Balances. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
56.
RebelskyF.HanksC.1971 “Fathers’ verbal interaction with infants in the first three months of life.” Child Development, 42: 63–68.
57.
RokeachM.1973The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free Press.
58.
RyallM. D.SampsonR. C.2009 “Formal contracts in the presence of relational enforcement mechanisms: Evidence from technology development projects.” Management Science, 55: 906–925.
59.
SchoenR.KimY. J.NathansonC. A.FieldsJ.AstoneN. M.1997 “Why do Americans want children?” Population and Development Review, 23: 333–358.
60.
SchwartzS. H.1992 “Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries.” In ZannaM. (ed.), Advances in Experimental and Social Psychology, 25: 1–65. New York: Academic Press.
61.
SchwartzS. H.2009 “Basic values: How they motivate and inhibit prosocial behavior.” In MikulincerM.ShaverP. (eds.), Herzlyia Symposium on Personality and Social Psychology, 1: 221–241. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
62.
SchwartzS. H.RubelT.2005 “Sex differences in values: Cross-cultural and multimethod studies.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89: 1010–1028.
63.
SimmelG.1950The Sociology of Georg Simmel: Trans., edit., and with an Introduction by K. H. Wolff. New York: Free Press.
64.
SørensenJ. B.SorensonO.2007 “Corporate demography and income inequality.” American Sociological Review, 72: 766–783.
65.
SpenceD.LurieE.1975 “Style of life.” In LowenthalM. F.ThurnherM.ChiribogaD. (eds.), Four Stages of Life: A Comparative Study of Women and Men Facing Transitions: 1–23. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
66.
TaschR. J.1952 “The role of the father in the family” Journal of Experimental Education, 20: 319–361.
67.
ThompsonL.WalkerA. J.1989 “Gender in families: Women and men in marriage, work, and parenthood.” Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51: 845–871.
68.
ThurnherM.1975 “Family confluence, conflict, and affect.” In LowenthalM. F.ThurnherM.ChiribogaD. (eds.), Four Stages of Life: A Comparative Study of Women and Men Facing Transitions: 24–47. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
69.
WaiteL. J.GallagherM.2000The Case for Marriage: Why Married People Are Happier, Healthier, and Better off Financially. New York: Doubleday.
70.
WarnerR. L.1991 “Does the sex of your child matter? Support for feminism among women and men in the United States and Canada.” Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53: 1051–1056.
71.
WashingtonE. L.2008 “Female socialization: How daughters affect their legislator fathers’ voting on women’s issues.” American Economic Review, 98: 311–332.
