The thesis of the paper is that the hierarchical structure of organizations contributes to the explanation of the well-known firm size-wage effect. A theoretical analysis elaborates why and how wages may depend on hierarchical position and span of control. It is argued that wage premiums for supervisors add to the explanation of the firm size-wage effect, but that an effect of span of control should not be expected. In empirical analyses, both hypotheses are confirmed. The hierarchical structure of organizations explains at least 4 and at most 48 per cent of the wage gap between large and small firms.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baron, J.N.1984. Organizational Perspectives on Stratification. Annual Review of Sociology, 10, 37-69.
2.
Baron, J.N. & Bielby, W.T.1980. Bringing the Firms Back In: Stratification, Segmentation and the Organization of Work. American Sociological Review , 45, 737-765.
3.
Barth, J.R., Cordes, J.J. & Haber, S.E.1987. Employee Characteristics and Firm Size: Are There Systematic Empirical Relations?Applied Economics, 19(4), 555-567.
4.
Blau, P.1968. The Hierarchy of Authority in Organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 73, 453-467.
5.
Bowles, S.1985. The Production Process in a Competitive Economy: Walrasian, Neo-Hobbesian and Marxian Models. American Economic Review , 75(1), 16-36.
6.
Brown, C. & Medoff, J.1989. The Employer Size-Wage Effect. Journal of Political Economy, 97(5), 1027-1059.
7.
Calvo, G.A. & Wellisz, S.1979. Hierarchy, Ability and Income Distribution. Journal of Political Economy, 87, 991-1010.
8.
Collins, R.1979. The Credential Society. A Historical Sociology of Education and Stratification. New York: Academic Press.
9.
Diprete, T.A.1990. Is There a Non-Spurious Link between Market Power and the Wage Structure of Firms? Some Plausible Mechanisms. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 9, 283-306.
10.
Evans, D.S. & Leighton, L.S.1989. Why Do Smaller Firms Pay Less?Journal of Human Resources, 24, 299-318.
11.
Hedström, P.1991. Organizational Differentiation and Earnings Dispersion . American Journal of Sociology, 97, 96-113.
12.
Heinen, A. & Maas, A.1984. Het NPAO-Arbeidsmarktonderzoek (The NPAO Labour-Market Research). Tilburg: IVA.
13.
Kalleberg, A.L. & Berg, I.1987. Work and Industry: Structures, Markets and ProcessesNew York: Plenum Press.
14.
Kapteyn, A., Kooreman, P. & Van Der Ham, P.1985Evaluatie NPAO-survey (Evaluation NPAO Survey). OSA publicatie W7Den Haag: Staatsuitgeverij.
15.
Kruse, D.1992. Supervision, Working Conditions and the Employer Size-Wage Effect. Industrial Relations, 31(2), 229-249.
16.
Lazear, E.1979. Why Is There Mandatory Retirement?Journal of Political Economy87, 1261-1284.
17.
Lazear, E. & Rosen, S.1981. Rank-Order Tournaments as Optimum Labour Contracts . Journal of Political Economy, 89, 841-864.
18.
Le Grand, C., Szulkin, R. & Tahlin, M.1994. Organizational Structures and Job Rewards in Sweden . Acta Sociologica, 37(3), 231-251.
Petersen, T.1989. The Earnings Function in Sociological Studies of Earnings Inequality: Functional Form and Hours Worked. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 8, 220-252.
24.
Rosen, S.1982. Authority, Control and the Distribution of Earnings . The Bell Journal of Economics, 13, 311-323.
25.
Rosen, S.1986. Prices and Incentives in Elimination Tournaments . American Economic Review, 76, 701-715.
26.
Shapiro, C. & Stiglitz, J.1984. Equilibrium Unemployment as a Worker Discipline Device . American Economic Review, 74, 433-444.
27.
Sørensen, A.B.1974. A Model for Occupational Careers. American Journal of Sociology, 80(1), 44-57.
28.
Sorensen, A.B.1994. Opportunity and Training Effects on Careers. Paper prepared for ESF Conference Network on Transitions in Youth, 16-19 September, Seelisberg, Switzerland.
29.
Thurow, L.C.1975. Generating Inequality. Mechanisms of Distribution in the US. Economy. New York: Basic Books .
Villemez, W.J. & Bridges, W.P.1988. When Bigger is Better: Differences in the Individual Level Effect of Firm and Establishment Size. American Sociological Review, 53, 237-255.
