In this article, main findings of a comparative study on the social positions, attitudes and identities of younger Turkish and Norwegian women with higher education will be presented. The findings are based on interpretations of twenty in-depth interviews. Turkish and Norwegian interviewees differ considerably in terms of their social identities: they use dissimilar reference groups while evaluating their societal positions. The two groups also conceive gender and its social reflections in diverse terms. Such differences are analysed in light of differing class structures and modernization histories of the two countries. At the same time, Turkish and Norwegian interviewees share similar worries related to the expected difficulties of combining marriage, motherhood and employment. These accounts give support to arguments about an inherent incongruity in the design of modernity. The Norwegian welfare state and the Turkish family, with their enabling and constraining properties, are the key institutions in the lives of the informants of this study.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abrams, D. & Hogg, M. A. (eds.) 1990. Social Identity Theory: Constructive and Critical Advances. New York: Springer-Verlag.
2.
Acar, F.1990. Role Priorities and Career Patterns: A Cross-cultural Study of Turkish and Jordanian University Teachers. In S. S. Lie & V E. O'Leary (eds.), Storming the Tower: Women in the Academic World. London : Kogan Page.
3.
Allardt, E.1990. Challenges for Comparative Social Research. Acta Sociologica, 33, 183-193.
4.
Arat, Y.1989. The Patriarchal Paradox. Toronto : Associated University Press.
5.
Bauman, Z.1992. Intimations of Postmodernity. London : Routledge.
6.
Baykan, A.1990. Women between Fundamentalism and Modernity. In B. S. Turner (ed.), Theories of Modernity and Postmodernity, pp. 136-146. London: Sage.
7.
Beck, U.1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
8.
Beck, U. & Beck-Gernsheim, E.1995. The Normal Chaos of Love . Cambridge: Polity.
9.
Berger, P.L. & Luckmann, T.1966. The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Anchor.
10.
Bertaux, D.1981. From the Life-History Approach to the Transformation of Sociological Practice. In D. Bertaux (ed.), Biography and Society: The Life-History Approach in the Social Sciences, pp. 29-45. London: Sage.
11.
Bertaux, D.1990. Oral History Approaches to an International Social Movement . In E. 0yen (ed.), Comparative Methodology, pp. 151-171, London: Sage.
12.
Bourdieu, P.1990. In Other Words. Cambridge: Polity.
13.
Bourdieu, P. & Wacquant, J.D.1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity.
Giddens, A.1984. The Constitution of Society. Cambridge : Polity.
21.
Giddens, A.1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge : Polity.
22.
Giddens, A.1991. Modernity and Self-identity. Cambridge : Polity.
23.
Göle, N.1991. Modern Mahrem (Modern Seclusion)Istanbul : Metis.
24.
Gullestad, M.1992. The Art of Social Relations: Essays on Culture, Social Action and Everyday Life in Modern Norway. Oslo : Scandinavian University Press.
25.
Hernes, H.M.1987. Welfare State and Woman Power: Essays in State Feminism . Oslo: Norwegian University Press .
26.
Inglehart, R.1990. Culture Shift in AdvancedIndustrial Society. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
27.
Kandiyoti, D.1995. Patterns of Patriarchy: Notes for an Analysis of Male Dominance in Turkish Society. In S. Tekeli (ed.), Women in Modern Turkish Society. London: Zed Books.
28.
Kaplan, G.1992. Contemporary Western European Feminism. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
29.
Knudsen, K. & Wærness, K.1996. Er ekteskapet som institution pd vei ut i Skandinavia? (Is Marriage as an Institution on its Way Out in Scandinavia?) Working paper , Department of Sociology, University of Bergen.
30.
Kumar, K.1995. From Post-industrial to Post-modern Society. Oxford: Blackwell.
31.
Marshall, B.L.1994. Engendering Modernity: Feminism, Social Theory and Social Change. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
32.
May, C. & Cooper, A.1995. Personal Identity and Social Change: Some Theoretical Considerations. Acta Sociologica, 38, 75-85.
33.
Mills, C.W.1959. The Sociological Imagination. New York : Oxford University Press.
34.
National Report.1992. The Development of Education in Norway. International Conference on Education, Geneva.
35.
National Report. 1994. Gender Equality in Norway. The National Report to the Fourth UN Conference on Women in Beijing, 1995. Oslo: Royal Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
36.
Noack, T.1994. Familien i Endring (The Family in Change). In D. Bruusgaard, A. Hatland & A. Syse (eds.), Et Nedvendig Gode: Folketrygdens plass i Velferds-Norge (A necessary benefit: the place of national insurance in welfare Norway), pp. 41-58. Oslo : Ad Notam Gyldendal.
37.
Öncü, A.1981. Turkish Women in Professions: Why so Many? In N. Abadan-Unat (ed.), Women in Turkish Society. Leiden : E. J. Brill.
38.
ÖSYM. 1993. The 1992-1993 Academic Year Higher Education Statistics . Ankara: Student Selection and Placement Centre Publications.
39.
Ragin, C.1987. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
40.
Silverman, D.1985. Qualitative Methodology and Sociology: Describing the Social World. Hants: Gower.
41.
Sis.1993. Household Labour Force Survey Results. Ankara: State Institute of Statistics Publications.
42.
Skevington, S. & Baker, D. (eds.) 1989. The Social Identity of Women . London: Sage.
43.
Sümer, S.1996. Ambiguous Modernities, Vigorous Identities: A Comparative Study of the Educated Women of Urban Turkey and Norway. Unpublished thesis , Department of Sociology, University of Bergen.
44.
Sztompka, P.1990. Conceptual Frameworks in Comparative Inquiry: Divergent or Convergent? In M. Albrow & E. King (eds.), Globalization, Knowledge and Society. pp. 47-58. London: Sage.
45.
Tekeli, S.1986. Emergence of the Feminist Movement in Turkey. In D. Dahlerup (ed.), The New Women's Movement. London: Sage.
46.
Tekeli, S.1995. Introduction: Women in Turkey in the 1980s. In S. Tekeli (ed.), Women in Modern Turkish Society . London: Zed Books .
47.
Therborn, G.1995. European Modernity and Beyond: The Trajectory of European Societies, 1945-2000. London: Sage .
48.
Wagner, P.1994. A Sociology of Modernity: Liberty and Discipline . London: Routledge.
49.
Weigert, A.J.1988. To Be or Not: Self and Authenticity, Identity and Ambivalence . In D. K. Lapsley & F. C. Power (eds.), Self, Ego and Identity: Integrative Approaches pp. 263-281. New York: Springer-Verlag.
50.
Weigert, A.J., Teitge, J.S. & Teitge, D.W.1986. Society and Identity: Toward a Sociological Psychology . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51.
Wærness, K.1994Women and the Welfare State: Common and Conflicting Interests in the 1990s. In L. Simonen (ed.), När Gränserna Flyter (When the borders float: a Nordic anthology on care) . Jyväskylä: Stakes Report no. 134.
