Sociological theorizing is likely to change dramatically in the near future, moving from focusing on conceptualization onto explanation. Central to a new theoretical movement will be a spelling out and an elaboration of a core sociological mode of explanation, common, with variations, to most schools of sociology. In a comparison with rational choice models, the specificity of sociological explanations of action and its outcomes is found to reside in their treatment of actors, in contrast to situations, as systematically variable. The variability of actors as the key explaining variable is then spelled out in terms of the varying cultural belonging and structural location of actors. The promise of composite models of rational choice and cultural-cum-structural determinations is also pointed to.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, J.1987The Centrality of the Classics In A. Giddens and J. Turner (eds.), Social Theory TodayCambndge: Polity Press.
2.
Alexander, J.1988. Action and Its EnvironmentsNew York : Columbia University Press.
3.
Alexander, J.1990On the 'Autonomy' of Culture, introduction to J Alexander & S. Seidman (eds.), Culture and Society: Contemporary Debates.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Alexander, J. et al. (eds.) 1987. The Micro-Macro Link.Berkeley: University of California Press.
5.
Alexander, J. & Colony, P. (eds.) 1990. Differentiation Theory and Social ChangeNew York: Columbia University Press.
6.
Almond, G. & Verba, S.1963. The Civic Culture. Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five NationsPrinceton: Princeton University Press.
7.
Archer, M.1988. Culture and AgencyCambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Axelrod, R.1984. The Evolution of CooperationNew York : Basic Books.
9.
Axelrod, R.1986. An Evolutionary Approach to NormsAmerican Political Science Review86:4, 1095-1111.
10.
Ball-Rokeach, S.J.1986. Media Linkages of the Social Fabric In J. Short (ed.), The Social Fabric.Beverly Hills: Sage, pp. 305-318.
11.
Barth, F. (ed.) 1969. Ethnic Groups and Boundaries.Boston: Little, Brown.
12.
Basu, K. et al.1987. The Growth and Decay of Custom: The Role of the New Institutional Economics in Economic HistoryExplorations in Economic History24, 1-21.
13.
Becker, G.1976. The Economic Approach to Human BehaviorChicago: Chicago University Press.
14.
Berger, J., Wagner, D. & Zelditch Jr. M.1985. Theoretical and Metatheoretical Themes in Expectation States Theory In H. J Helle and S. N. Eisenstadt (eds.), Microsociological TheoryLondon : Sage.
15.
Berkowitz, S.D.1988. Markets and Market-Areas Some Preliminary Formulations In B. Wellman & S. D. Berkowitz (eds). Social Structures A Network ApproachCambndge: Cambndge University Press, pp. 261-303.
16.
Black, D. (ed. ), 1984. Toward a General Theory of Social Control.Orlando Fa.: Academic Press .
17.
Blalock, H.1984Basic Dilemmas in the Social SciencesBeverly Hills: Sage.
18.
Blau, P.1977Inequality, and HeterogeneityNew York : The Free Press
19.
Blau, P.1987. Contrasting Theoretical Perspectives In J Alexander et at. (eds.), The Micro-Macro Link.Berkeley, University of California Press, pp 71-85.
20.
Cohen, M. , March, J.K. & Olsen, J.1972. A Garbage Can Model of Organizational ChoiceAdministrative Science Quarterly17, 1-25
21.
Coleman, J.1990. Foundations of Social TheoryCambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press.
Elster, J.1989a. Solomonic JudgementsCambndge : Cambridge University Press.
28.
Elster, J.1989b. The Cement of SocietyCambndge; Cambndge University Press.
29.
Etzioni, A.1988. The Moral DimensionNew York: The Free Press.
30.
Field, A.J.1981The Problem with Neoclassical Institutional Economics: A Critique worth Special Reference to the North-Thomas Model of Pre-1500 EuropeExplorations in Economic History18, 174-198.
31.
Field, A.J.1984. Microeconomics, Norms, and RationalityEconomic Development and Cultural Change32, 683-711.
32.
Gerschenkron, A.1962. Economic Backwardness in Historical PerspectiveCambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press.
33.
Giddens, A.1984. The Constitution of SocietyCambridge : Polity Press.
Giddens, A.1987. Social Theory and Modern SociologyCambridge: Polity Press.
36.
Giddens, A.1989. A Reply to My Critics In D. Held and J Thompson (eds.), Social Theory of Modern Society. Anthony Giddens and his Critics.Cambndge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
Giddens, A. & Turner, J. (eds.) 1987. Social Theory Today.Cambridge: Polity Press.
38.
Granovetter, M.1985. Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embedded-nessAmerican Journal of Sociology91, 481-510.
39.
Habermas, J.1982Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, 2 volsFrankfurt: Suhrkamp.
40.
Harsanyi, J.1982Papers in Game TheoryDordrecht : D. Reidel.
Jervis, R.1988. Realism, Game Theory, and CooperationWorld PoliticsXL, 317-349.
43.
Korpi, W.1983. The Democratic Class StruggleLondon : Routledge.
44.
Krasner, S.1988. Sovereignty. An Institutional PerspectiveComparative Political Studies 21 , 66-94.
45.
Luce, R.D. & Raiffa, H.1957. Games and DecisionsNew York: Wiley.
46.
Luhmann, N. (ed.) 1985. Soziale Differenzierung.Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
47.
March, J. & Olsen, J.1984The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political LifeAmerican Political Science Review78, 734-749.
48.
March, J. & Olsen, J.1989Rediscovering InstitutionsNew York : Free Press
49.
Merton, R.1957. Social Theory and Social StructureGlencoe III. The Free Press
50.
Merton, R.1968. Social Theory and Social Structure Rev. and enlarged ed. New York: The Free Press.
51.
Park, R. [1928] 1964 Human Migration and Marginal Man In R Park, Race and CultureGlencoe : Free Press, pp 346-356. (First published in American Journal of Sociology, vol. XXXIII in 1928).
52.
Parsons, T.1937. The Structure of Social ActionNew York: McGraw Hill.
53.
Przeworski, A.1985. Capitalism and Social DemocracyCambndge : Cambridge University Press.
54.
Przeworski, A.1986. Le défi de la méthodologie individualiste a l'analyse marxiste In P. Birnbaum & J. Leca (eds.), Sur l'individualtsme.Paris: Presses de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques, pp. 77-106.
55.
Ringen, 1987. The Possibility of PoliticsOxford: Clarendon Press .
56.
Rogowski, R.1985. Causes and Varieties of Nationalism In E. Tinyakian & R Rogowski (eds.), New Nationalisms of the Developed West.Boston: Allen & Unwin, pp. 87-108
57.
Schlesinger, A. Jr.1986. The Cycles of American HistoryBoston: Houghton Mifflin
58.
Simmel, G. [1908] 1964. Quantitative Aspects of the Group In K. Wolff (ed ), The Sociology of Georg Simmel.New York: The Free Press, pp. 87-177 (First published in G. Simmel, Soziologie of 1908.)
59.
Smelser, N.1988. Social Structure In N. Smelser (ed)., Handbook of Sociology.Beverly HillsSage, pp. 103-129.
60.
Sorokin, P.1937-41. Social and Cultural Dynamics 4 vols. New York: American Book Company
61.
Stigler, G. & Becker, G.1977De Gustibus Non Est DisputandumAmerican Economic Review67, 76-90
62.
Stinchcombe, A.1975Merton's Theory of Social Structure In L. Coser (ed ), The Idea of Social Structure Papers in Honor of Roberi K Merton.New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
63.
Swedberg, R (ed.) 1990. Economics and SociologyPrinceton: Pnnceton University Press
64.
Sztompka, P.1986. Robert K. Merton An Intellectual ProfileHoundmills, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
65.
Therborn, G.1980. The Ideology of Power and the Power of IdeologyLondon: Verso.
66.
Therborn, G.1991The Right to Vote and the Four World Routes To/Through Modernity In R. Torstendahl (ed.), The State in Theory and HistoryLondon: Sage
67.
Tsebelis, G.1990. Nested GamesBerkeley: University of California Press
68.
Turner, J.1988. A Theory of Social InteractionCambndge : Polity Press
69.
Van Parijs, Ph.1981. Evolutionary Explanation in the Social Sciences An Emerging ParadigmTotowa N.J.: Rowman and Littlefield.
70.
Verba, S. et al.1987. Elites and the Idea of EqualityCambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
71.
Weber, M.1988. Gesammelte Aufsazte zur WissenschaftslehreTubingen: Mohr/UTB (1st ed. 1922).
72.
Wellman, B.1988. Structural Analysis: From Method and Metaphors to Theory and Substance In B. Wellman & S. D. Berkowitz (eds.), Social Structures. A Network Approach.Cambridge : Cambndge University Press, pp. 19-61.
73.
White, H.1988. Varieties of Markets In B Wellman & S. D. Berkowitz (eds.), Social Structures: A Network ApproachCambridgeCambridge University Press, pp 221-260.
74.
Wildavsky, A.1987. Choosing Preferences by Constructing Institutions: A Cultural Theory of Preference FormationAmerican Political Science Review81, 3-21.
75.
Williamson, O.1985. The Economic Institutions of CapitalismNew York: The Free Press.
