The following major interpretative problem is presented: How do we know, make probable and plausible, or document the meaning of speech acts and the meaning and functions of sequences or systems of sequences of social interaction? Assignment of meaning is here understood as an interpretative process that generates higher level predications It signifies a movement from a specific level to a more general This problem is discussed in connection with collection of information. Included is also a discussion about how social processes and cultural conditions affect the production of sociological data, and thus, why conscious and systematical management of these problems is vital for sociological interpretation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Berger, P.L. & Luckmann, T.1966. The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Double-day
2.
Briggs, C. L 1986Learning How to Ask. A Sociolinguistic Appraisal of the Role of the Interview in Social Science Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Cicourel, A. V 1973Cognitive Sociology. Language and Meaning in Social Interaction. Harmondsworth: Penguin
4.
Cicourel. A.V.1974Interviewing and Memory In C. Cherry (cd ), Pragmatic Aspects of Human Communication . Dordrecht-Holland Reidel.
5.
Cicourel, A.V.1977. Cognitive-linguistic Aspects of Social Research Sozialwissenschaftliche Annalen Band 1 B1-B21. WienPhysica Verlag
6.
Cicourel, A.V.1983. Social Measurement as the Creation of Expert Systems . Paper presented at a conference on 'Potentialities for knowledge and social science', University of Chicago , September 11-14.
7.
Cicourel, A.V.1987The Interpenetration of Communicative Contexts. Examples from Medical Encounters. Social Psychology Quarterly50(2), 217-226.
Deutscher, I.1972Public and Private Opinions. Social Situations and Multiple Realities In S. Z. Nagi & R G. Corwin (eds ), The Social Contexts of ResearchLondonWiley
10.
Garfinkel, H.1967. Studies in EthnomethodologyEnglewood Cliffs, N J . Prentice-Hall.
11.
Geertz, C.1973The Interpretation of CulturesNew York : Basic Books.
12.
Glaser, B. & Strauss, A 1967The Discovery of Grounded Theory Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.
13.
Hammersley, M. & Atkinson, P.1983Ethnography Principles in PracticeLondon: Tavistock
14.
Holy, L.1984Theory, Methodology and the Research Process In R F. Ellen (ed ), Ethnographic Research. New York: Academic Press .
15.
Mehan, H. & Wood, H 1975The Reality of Ethnomethodology. New York: Wiley.
16.
Moerman, M.1974Accomplishing Ethnicity In R Turner (ed ), Ethnomethodology . Harmondsworth : Penguin.
17.
Måseide, P.1988Organisasjonsteori som Psyktatrisk Ideologi. Stavanger: Rogaland Research Institute .
18.
Phillips, D. L 1973. Abandoning Method. San Francisco . Jossey-Bass.
19.
Pollner, M.1987Mundane Reasoning Reality in Everyday and Sociological Discourse. CambridgeCambridge University Press.
20.
Rumelhart, D.E. & Norman, D.A.1981. Analogical Processes in Learning. In J R. Anderson (ed ), Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition. Hillsdale, N J.: Earlbaum.
21.
Schwartz, H. & Jacobs, J.1979. Qualitative Sociology A Method to the MadnessLondon. Macmillan
Sudnow, D.1965. Normal Crimes: Sociological Features of the Penal Code in a Public Defence OfficeSocial Problems12, 255-276.
24.
Turner, R. (ed ), 1974. Ethnomethodology. Harmondsworth : Penguin.
25.
Wieder, D.L.1971. On meaning by rule. In J. Douglas (ed ), Understanding Everyday Life. Toward the Reconstruction of Sociological KnowledgeLondonRoutledge & Kegan Paul.
26.
Winograd, T.1975Frame Representations and the Declarative-Procedural Controversy . In D G. Bobrow & A. M. Collins (eds ), Representation and Understanding Studies in Cognitive ScienceNew York: Academic Press.
27.
Wootton, A.1975Dilemmas of Discourse Controversies about the Sociological Interpretation of Language. LondonAllen & Unwin.
