The Weber renaissance still pertains, with the old theme of the relationship between Marx and Weber part of it, though with a long prehistory going back as far as Karl Lowith. Turner accurately grasps the meaning of modern 'Marxian' interpretations of Weber and penetrates the comparative approach in Weber's substantial sociology. The prolonged engagement in the Marx- Weber theme is more confusing than illuminating, because of its spectacular character Thomason interprets Schutz's elaboration of Weber's understand ing and provides us with historical insight into the development of the Schutzean tradition of phenomenology.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Cahnman, Werner J.1964. Max Weber and the Methodological Controversy in the Social Sciences, In Cahnman & Boskoff (eds.) Sociology and HistoryGlencoe .
2.
Janoska-Bendl, Judith.1965. Methodologische Aspekte des Idealtypus. Max Weber und die Soziologie der GeschichteBerlin .
3.
Parsons, Talcott.1968. The Structure of Social Action Vols I and II. New York and London, originally published in 1937.
4.
Salomon, Albert.1934. Max Weber's Methodology, in Social Research, I.
5.
Salomon, Albert.1935. Max Weber's Sociology, in Social Research, II.
6.
Salomon, Albert.1935. Max Weber's Political Ideas, in Social Research , II.
7.
Zeitlin, Irving M.1968. Ideology and the Development of Sociological Theory . Englewood Cliffs.
