Recent discussions of capitalism in agriculture suggest that the classical Marxist texts are outmoded These critiques, however, offer little in the way of empirical support for their claims. When data on the development of United States agriculture are examined they confirm the classical theorists. The development of American agriculture has been characterized by an increase in scale, in capital investment and in the importance of wage labor.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Djurfeldt, Goran'What Happened to the Agrarian Bourgeoisie and Rural Proletariat Under Monopoly Capitalism'?' Acta Sociologica, Vol. 24, No 3 (1981). pp 167-192
2.
Friedland, William & Barton. Amy.'Tomato Technology'. Society (September-October. 1976), pp. 35-42
3.
Holt, James.'Farm Labor and the Structure of American Agriculture ' Structure Issues in American Agriculture Economics, Statistics and Cooperative Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Washington, D C. Agricultural Economics Report No. 438. November 1979.
4.
Lenin, V.I.The Development of Capitalism in Russia. Progress Publishers , Moscow1974.
5.
Lenin, V.I.Theory of the Agrarian Question, Progress Publishers , Moscow1938.
6.
Lin. William and others 'Farm Commodity Programs Who Participates and Who Benefits ?' Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. Agricultural Economics Report No. 474, 1981
7.
Lin, William and others. 'U S Farm Numbers, Sizes and Related Dimensions: Projections to the Year 2000 ' Economics, Statistics and Cooperatives Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Washington. D.C. Technical Bulletin No. 1625, 1980
8.
Miller, Thomas and others 'Economies of Size in U S. Field Crop Farming ' Economics and Statistics Service. United States Department of Agriculture , Washington. D C Agricultural Economic Report No. 472, 1981.
9.
McDonald, Thomas & Coffman, George.'Fewer and Larger Farms by the Year 2000—and Some Consequences.' Economics and Statistics Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D C AIB No 439, 1980.
10.
Nelson, Frederick & Cochrane, WilliamEconomic Consequences of Federal Farm Commodity Programs. 1953-1972.' Agricultural Economics Research, Vol. 28, No. 2 ( 1976), pp. 52-64.
11.
Raikes. Philip 'Djurfeldt's "What Happened to the Agrarian Bourgeoisie and Rural Proletariat Under Monopoly Capitalism"" A Comment.' Acta Sociologica, Vol. 25, No. 2 ( 1982), pp 159-166.
12.
Sonka, Steven.'The Research Needs of Small Farmers.' Small Farm Issues Economics, Statistics and Cooperative Service. United States Department of Agriculture , Washington1979.
13.
Smith, Leslie & Coltrane, Robert.'Agricultural Labor Needs in the 1980s.' Staff Report. Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.1981.
14.
United States Congressional Budget OfficePublic Policy and the Changing Structure of American AgricultureUnited States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.1978.
15.
United States Department of Agriculture.Economic Indicators of the Farm Sector. Production and Efficiency Statistics, 1980. Economics and Statistics Service, Washington, D.C. Statistical Bulletin 679 January 1982.
16.
United States Department of Agriculture.Agricultural Statistics 1981United States Government Printing Office. Washington. D.C. 1982.
17.
Winter, Michael 'What Happened to the Agrarian Bourgeoisie and Rural Proletariat Under Monopoly Capitalism? A.Reply to Goran Djurfeldt' Acta Sociologica, Vol. 25, No. 2 ( 1982), pp. 147-158.
