Researchers concerned with resource allocation and distributive justice have paid little attention to the nature of the allocated resource, per se, as a determinant of the criterion according to which distribution takes place. Recently, six studies carried out in Germany, Sweden and the United States have demonstrated the effects of different types of resources upon preference for one of the following three criteria of distribution : contribution, need and equality. As the symbolic meaning of a given resource may vary with the situation in which it is allocated, the influence of different social contexts was studied as well. The findings were briefly described and compared. Expected relationships among resource class, social context and distribution rule were examined in the light of cognitive-developmental considerations and by way of integrating justice theory and resource theory. Finally, it was suggested that the influence of resources on the choice of a criterion may extend to the rewards and punishments which are often associated with the act of distribution.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, J.S.'Inequity in Social Exchange', in L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 2. Academic Press, New York1965.
2.
Cohen, R.L.'A Critique of Reward Allocation Research on Distributive Justice.' Unpublished manuscript, Bennington College, 1978.
3.
Deutsch, M. 'Cooperation, Bargaining, and Justice'. Unpublished manuscript, Columbia University, 1973.
4.
Deutsch, M.'Equity, Equality and Need. What Determines Which Value will be Used as the Basis of Distributive Justice?' Journal of Social Issues, Vol 31 (1975), pp 137-150.
5.
Foa, U.G. 'Interpersonal and Economic Resources', Science, Vol. 71 (1971), pp. 345-351.
6.
Foa, U.G. & Foa, E.B.Societal Structures of the Mind, Thomas, I11. 1974.
7.
Foa, U.G. & Shay, S.A.'The Influence of Business Success on Preference for Distributive Justice' . Submitted 1982.
8.
Foa, U.G. & Stein, G. 'Rules of Distributive Justice: Institution and Resource Influences ', Academic Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 2 (1980), pp. 89-94.
9.
Goode, W.J.The Celebration of Heroes: Prestige as a Control System, University of California Press, 1978.
10.
Greenberg, J. & Cohen, R.L.'Why Justice? Normative and Instrumental Interpretations', in J. Greenberg & R. L. Cohen (eds.), Equity and Justice in Social Behavior, Academic Press, New York, 1982.
Kayser, E., Feeley, M. & Lamm, H.Laienpsychologie sozialer Beziehungen Vorstellungen über gerechtes und tatsachliches Verhalten. Universitat Mannheim: Bericht aus dem Sonderforschungsbereich 24, 1982.
13.
Kayser, E. & Lamm, H. 'Input Integration and Input Weighting in Decisions on Allocation of Gains and Losses', European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 10 (1980), pp. 1-15.
14.
Kayser, E. & Schwinger, T.'A Theoretical Analysis of the Relationship among Individual Justice Concepts, Layman Psychology and Distribution Decision', Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, Vol. 12 (1982), pp. 47-51
15.
Kohlberg, L.'Moral Stages and Moralization: The Cognitive-Developmental Approach', in T. Lickona (ed), Moral Development and Behavior, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York1976.
16.
Lerner, M.J.'The Justice Motive in Social Behavior: An Introduction', Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 31 ( 1975), pp. 1-20.
17.
Lerner, M.J. 'The Justice Motive: Some Hypotheses as to its Origins and Forms', Journal of Personality, Vol. 45 ( 1977), pp. 1-52.
18.
Lerner, M.J.'The Justice Motive in Human Relations Some Thoughts on What we Know and Need to Know about Justice', in M. J. Lerner & S. C. Lerner (eds.), The Justice Motive in Social Behavior. Adapting to Times of Scarcity and Change, Plenum Press, New York1981.
19.
Lerner, M.J., Miller, D.T. & Holmes, J.G.'Deserving and the Emergence of Forms of Justice', in L. Berkowitz & E. Walster (eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 9, Academic Press, New York1976.
20.
Leventhal, G.S.The Distribution of Rewards and Resources m Groups and Organizations', in L. Berkowitz & E. Walster (eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology , Vol. 9, Academic Press, New York1976a
21.
Leventhal, G.S.'Fairness in Social Relationships', in J. W. Thibaut, J. T Spence & R. C. Carson (eds.), Contemporary Topics in Social Psychology, General Learning Press, N.J.1976b.
22.
Mikula, G.'On the Role of Justice in Allocation Decisions', in G. Mikula (ed.), Justice and Social Interaction, Springer-Verlag, New York1980.
23.
Mikula, G. & Schwinger, T.'Inter-member Relations and Reward Allocation: Theoretical Considerations of Affects', in H. Brandstatter, J. H. Davis & H. Schuler (eds.), Dynamics of Group Decisions, Sage, CA, 1978.
24.
Montada, L. 'Developmental Changes in Concepts of Justice', in G Mikula (ed.), Justice and Social Interaction , Springer-Verlag, New York1980.
25.
Piaget, J.The Moral Judgment of the Child, Free Press, New York1965
26.
Selman, R.L.'Social-Cognitive Understanding: A Guide to Educational and Clinical Practice' , in T. Lickona (ed.), Moral Development and Behavior, Holt, Rinehart & Winston , New York1976.
27.
Schmitt, M. & Montada, L. 'Determinanten erlebter Gerechtigkeit', Zeitschrift fur Sozialpsychologie, Vol. 13 ( 1982), pp. 32-44.
28.
Schwinger, T. 'Just Allocation of Goods: Decisions among Three Principles'. in G. Mikula (ed.), Justice and Social Interaction, Springer-Verlag, New York1980.
29.
Schwinger, T. & Nahrer, W.Prinzipien der gerechten Vergabe von interpersonalen Ressourcen in verschiedenen Sozialbeziehungen. Universitat Mannheim Bencht aus dem Sonderforschungsbereich24. In prep.
30.
Tornblom, K.Y., Jonsson, D.R. & Knowles, E.S.When Justice Is and Is Not Requested: The Effects of Non-recipient Allocators' Social Awareness and Recipient Categorization on Choice of Distribution Rule . Paper presented at the Nintieth Annual Convention of the Amencan Psychological Association, Washington, D C1982.
31.
Tornblom, K.Y. & Jonsson, D.R.'Institutional Context, Resource Class, and the Evaluation of Distribution Principles' In prep.
32.
van Kreveld, D. & van Beemen, E.K.'Distributing Goods and Benefits: a Framework and Review of Research', Gedrag Tijdschrift voor Psychologie , Vol. 6 (1978), pp. 361-401.
