This essay selectively reviews some major issues implicit in Elster's Logic and Society In particular, Elster's reliance on the utilitarian model of the actor as the basis for general social theory, his assumption that modal concepts can be reduced to extensional ones, and his adoption of the natural science model raise fundamental problems for his general approach Con sequently, despite the fact that many of Elster's discussions of particular examples are instructive and provocative, the work overall is disappointing.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Blumstein, Alfred, Cohen, Jacqueline & Nagin, Daniel (Eds.). Deterrence and Incapacitation: Estimating the Effects of Criminal Sanctions on Crime Rates, National Academy of Sciences , Washington, D C.1978.
2.
Camic, Charles. 'The Utilitarians Revisited'. American Journal of Sociology , Vol. 85 (1979). pp.516-550.
3.
Elster, Jon.Logic and Society. Contradictions and Possible Worlds, Wilse, New York1978.
4.
Føllesdal. Dagfinn.'Quine on Modality', in D Davidson & J Hintikka (Eds ) Words and Objections. Essays on the Work of W V. QuineD Reidel. Dordrecht. Holland 1970.
5.
Hollis, Martin & Nell, Edward J.Rational Economic Man, Cambridge University Press, New York1975.
6.
Merton, Robert K.Social Theory and Social Structure. Free Press, New York1949.
7.
Parsons, Talcott.Social Theory and Social StructureMcGraw-Hill, New York1937.
8.
Parsons, Talcott.The Social System. Free Press, New York1951
9.
Quine, W.V.'Three Grades of Modal Involvement Proceedings of the XIth International Congress of Philosophy (Brussels, 1953 ) 14:65-81
10.
Quine, W.V.Word and Object, MIT Press, Cambridge. Mass1960
11.
Quine, W.V.Reply to Follesdal', in D. Davidson and J Hintikka(Eds ).Words and Objections: Essays on the Work of W. V. Quine, D Reidel, Dordrecht. Holland 1970.
