The concept of action is combined with a preference-outcome model of 'power' in order to elucidate the conception of one actor getting another to do (or forbear to do) something the second would not otherwise do. The paper thus builds upon the Weberian concept of Power and attempts to elucidate this concept within the framework of the modern analytical phil osophy of action (Danto) The practical syllogism (Von Wright) is invoked as a basic way of explaining actions and forbearances The concept of 'power' is distinguished from the concept of 'influence' (Parsons) and the distinction is used to point to some basic problems in social control.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abell, P.Organisations as Bargaining and Influence Systems, Heinemann . London1975.
2.
Abell, P. 'The Many Faces of Power and Liberty', Sociology, Vol 11 (1976)
3.
Abell, P. 'Organisation; as Constrained Bargaining and Influence Systems' in M Warner (Ed.), Organisational Choice and Constraint, Saxon House, UK 1977.
4.
Bachrach, Peter & Baratz, Martin SPower and Poverty. Theory and PracticeOUP, London1970.
5.
Borden, Margaret A.Purposive Explanation in Psychology. Harvester Press, UK 1978.
6.
Dahl, Robert A.'The Concept of Power', Behavioural Science, Vol 2 (1957).
7.
Danto, Arthur CAnalytical Philosophy, of Action, Cambridge U.P, Cambridge1973.
8.
Elster, Jon.Logic and Society Contradictions and Possible Worlds, Wiley, Chichester1978.
9.
Green, J.M.A.Aggregation in Economic Analysis - an Introductory Survey, Pnnceton UP, Princeton, N.J.1969 .
10.
Hanan, A.T.Aggregation and Disaggregation and Sociology, Lexington Books, Toronto1971.
11.
Nagel, Jack, H The Descriptive Analysis of Power, Yale University Press , New Haven1975.
12.
Parsons, Talcott. 'On the Concept of Influence', Public Opinion Quarterly , Vol 27 (1963).
13.
Von Wright, H.G.Explanation and Understanding, Routledge & Kegan Paul . London1971.
