Abstract
The long tradition of empirical studies on social mobility has given us a rather comprehensive knowledge of that process. The relevance of this knowledge to class structuration is the main problem discussed in this article. Social mobility viewed as a phenomenon creating blurred class boundaries and a low level of class structuration is questioned. It is argued that the effects of social mobility are highly conditional. Primarily as a result of the decline in the farming population, a relative increase in the number of white-collar workers, and weaker market capacity for certain white-collar groups, the character and effects of mobility may change. These changes may in turn facilitate the acceptance of socialistic values among white-collar workers as well as create greater homogeneity among manual workers. Social mobility in the future is not assumed to be an obstacle, and may even contribute to a higher level of class structuration where the relevant working class is composed primanly of salaried employees and not just manual workers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
