Causal structures involving a dynamic relation with time lags present difficulties if approached with conventional multivariate cross-sectional techniques. It is shown that customary tests for causal structure, e. g. partial correlations, break down or yield ambiguous results. Some further implications of lagged structure, and an extension of the idea to variability in space, are discussed in the paper.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ashby, W.R. An Introduction toCybernetics. New York: Wiley, 1963. First published 1956.
2.
Brown, J.S. and B.G. Gilmartin. "Sociology Today: Lacunae, Emphases, and Surfeits."American Sociologist4 (November) 1969:283-291.
3.
Blalock, H. M. Jr.Causal Inferences in Nonexperimental Research. Chspel Hill : Univ. of North Carolina Press, 1961.
4.
Theory Construction: From Verbal to Mathematical Formulations. Fnglewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1969.
5.
Carlsson, G.: Partiforskjutningar som tillvaxtprocesser. Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift. Vol. 66, 1963: 172-213, "Party Changes as Growth Processes;" in Swedish. "Time and Continuity in Mass Attitude Change: The Case of Voting." Public Opinion Quarterly29 (Spring) 1965: 1-15.
6.
" Social Trends and Human Decision: Discretionary Change as a Field of Research ." Pp. 129-146 in P. Lindblom (ed.), Theory and Methods in Behavioral Sciences. Stockholm : Scandinavian University Books, 1970.
7.
Coleman, J. S. "The Mathematical Study of Change." Pp. 428478 in H. M. Blalock , Jr. and A. B. Blalock (eds.), Methodology in Social Research. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1968.
8.
Friedman. M.A Theory of the Consumption Function. Princeton : Princeton Univ. Press., 1957 .
9.
Orcutt, G.H.; Greenberger, M.; Korbel, Y.; and Rivlin, A.M.: Microanalysis of Socioeconomic Systems, New York : Harper, 1961
