Rooted in modified employment strain theory (EST), this article explores health outcomes among financially vulnerable solopreneurs in Europe—a financially at-risk subgroup of solo entrepreneurs or self-employed workers who do not hire employees. According to EST, workers’ health outcomes are explained by various working conditions and sources of social support. Our convenience sample was gathered through an online questionnaire (N = 235), and the structural relationships were analyzed using structural equation modeling. The main findings indicate that solopreneurs’ perceived general (mental and physical) health was positively associated with expected (instrumental) social support from family and friends, while specific adverse health outcomes of work stress (e.g. exhaustion, headaches) were positively associated with their working conditions—namely, financial and scheduling uncertainty, as well as exposure to unfair treatment at work. This study offers pioneering empirical insights into the determinants of health outcomes among (the most) precarious solopreneurs in Europe.
BeltPTuunainenJ (2021) The work-related well-being of solo, micro, and small business entrepreneurs. Nordic Journal of Business70(2): 109–131.
2.
BerrillJCassellsDO’Hagan-LuffM, et al. (2021) The relationship between financial distress and well-being: Exploring the role of self-employment. International Small Business Journal39(4): 330–349.
3.
BorghiPMurgiaAMondon-NavazoM, et al. (2021) Mind the gap between discourses and practices: Platform workers’ representation in France and Italy. European Journal of Industrial Relations27(4): 425–443.
4.
CieślikJVan StelA (2024) Solo self-employment––Key policy challenges. Journal of Economic Surveys38: 759–792.
5.
De BeckerEBruynseraedeC (2024) Unemployment protection for self-employed and platform workers in Belgium. European Journal of Social Security26(2): 123–139.
6.
De BorstJP (2018). How the solo self-employed mitigate lower income with their personality in order to manifest well-being. PhD Thesis. University of Strathclyde, UK.
7.
Eurofound. (2015) European Working Conditions Survey 2015—Questionnaire, 3 December. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
8.
Eurofound. (2024) Self-Employment in the EU: Job Quality and Developments in Social Protection, 30 January. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Fairwork. (2023) Work in the Planetary Labour Market: Fairwork Cloudwork Ratings 2023, 1 July. Oxford: Fairwork Project.
12.
GevaertJBosmansKDe MoortelD, et al. (2023) “I thought it would have been more about only the fun stuff”—Exploring the expectation–reality gap among the novice solo self-employed. Businesses3: 150–165.
13.
GevaertJMoortelDWilkensM, et al. (2018) What’s up with the self-employed? A cross-national perspective on the self-employed’s work-related mental well-being. SSM—Population Health4: 317–326.
14.
GodinIDesmarezPMahieuC (2017) Company size, work-home interference, and well-being of self-employed entrepreneurs. Archives of Public Health75(69): 1–9.
15.
HairJFBlackWCBabinBJ, et al. (2019) Multivariate Data Analysis. Andover: Cengage.
16.
HaynesSNRichardDCSKubanyES (1995) Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment7(3): 238–247.
17.
JansenG (2019) Self-employment as atypical or autonomous work: Diverging effects on political orientations. Socio-Economic Review17(2): 381–407.
18.
LewchukWClarkeMDe WolffA (2008) Working without commitments: Precarious employment and health. Work, Employment and Society22(3): 387–406.
19.
KarasekRBrissonCKawakamiN, et al. (1998) The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): An instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology3(4): 322–355.
20.
KarasekRA (1979) Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly24: 285–307.
21.
MüehlbergerU (2007) Dependent Self-Employment. Workers on the Border Between Employment and Self-Employment. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
NordenmarkMVinbergSStrandhM (2012) Job control and demands, work-life balance and wellbeing among self-employed men and women in Europe. Vulnerable Groups & Inclusion3(1): 18896.
24.
OttoKBalukuMMHünefeldL, et al. (2020) Caught between autonomy and insecurity: A work-psychological view on resources and strain of small business owners in Germany. Frontiers in Psychology11: 525613.
25.
PeerEBrandimarteLSamatS, et al. (2017) Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology70: 153–163.
26.
R Core Team. (2022) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
27.
RosseelY (2012) Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software48(2): 1–36.
28.
SchippersJ (2019) Labour market flexibility, self-employment and precariousness. In: ConenWSchippersJ (eds) Self-Employment as Precarious Work: A European Perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 23–39.
29.
SimmsMEversbergDDupuyC, et al. (2018) Organizing young workers under precarious conditions: What hinders or facilitates union success. Work and Occupations45(4): 420–450.
30.
ToivanenSMellnerCVinbergS (2015) Self-employed persons in Sweden—Mortality differentials by industrial sector and enterprise legal form: A five-year follow-up study. American Journal of Industrial Medicine58(1): 21–32.
31.
Van der ZwanPHesselsJBurgerM (2020) Happy free willies? Investigating the relationship between freelancing and subjective well-being. Small Business Economics55: 475–491.
32.
VivesAAmableMFerrerM, et al. (2010) The employment precariousness scale (EPRES): Psychometric properties of a new tool for epidemiological studies among waged and salaried workers. Occupational and Environmental Medicine67(8): 548–555.
